{"id":302287,"date":"2024-02-17T10:21:12","date_gmt":"2024-02-17T09:21:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=302287"},"modified":"2024-02-17T10:21:14","modified_gmt":"2024-02-17T09:21:14","slug":"wrong-time-magazine-january-2024-was-not-the-hottest-on-record","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=302287","title":{"rendered":"Wrong, Time Magazine, January 2024 Was Not the Hottest on Record"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"723\" data-attachment-id=\"302295\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=302295\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1024,1024\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?fit=723%2C723&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=723%2C723&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-302295\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?w=1024&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=768%2C768&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=800%2C800&amp;ssl=1 800w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=600%2C600&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=400%2C400&amp;ssl=1 400w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=200%2C200&amp;ssl=1 200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=450%2C450&amp;ssl=1 450w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=60%2C60&amp;ssl=1 60w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?resize=550%2C550&amp;ssl=1 550w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/climaterealism.com\/2024\/02\/wrong-time-magazine-january-2024-was-not-the-hottest-on-record\/\"> ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/climaterealism.com\/author\/awatts\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"702\" height=\"632\" data-attachment-id=\"302289\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=302289\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-221.png?fit=702%2C632&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"702,632\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-221\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-221.png?fit=702%2C632&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-221.png?resize=702%2C632&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-302289\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-221.png?w=702&amp;ssl=1 702w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-221.png?resize=300%2C270&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 702px) 100vw, 702px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An article in&nbsp;<em>Time Magazine<\/em>&nbsp;(<em>Time<\/em>) claims that January 2024 was the hottest ever on record for the planet. Titled,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/time.com\/6692678\/january-2024-hottest-record-global-warming\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2024 Had the Hottest January on Record Following 2023\u2019s Hottest Year on Record<\/a>&nbsp;the article is based on a single source of temperature data. Data from multiple other sources of temperature measurements refute this claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Time<\/em>&nbsp;refers to the Copernicus EU climate service as the source for its alarming claim. Copernicus EU&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/climate.copernicus.eu\/surface-air-temperature-january-2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&nbsp;issued press release claiming<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">January 2024 was the warmest January on record globally, with an average ERA5 surface air temperature of 13.14\u00b0C, 0.70\u00b0C above the 1991-2020 average for January and 0.12\u00b0C above the temperature of the previous warmest January, in 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The month was 1.66\u00b0C warmer than an estimate of the January average for 1850-1900, the designated pre-industrial reference period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The problem with that is that they are using a reference period of 1850 to 1900 that no other climate data source uses; a period, not coincidentally, more than 100 years of global warming ago when the Earth was cooler than today. For example, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) produced a map of the globe that\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/data.giss.nasa.gov\/gistemp\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">shows a significantly lower global temperature for January 2024<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" data-attachment-id=\"302290\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=302290\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-222.png?fit=930%2C523&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"930,523\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-222\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-222.png?fit=723%2C407&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-222.png?resize=723%2C407&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-302290\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-222.png?w=930&amp;ssl=1 930w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-222.png?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-222.png?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The GISS global value was just 1.20\u00b0C compared to the 1.66\u00b0C claimed by Copernicus is different because NASA GISS is using a base period of 1951 to 1980. Copernicus seemingly cherry picked the reference period to fit the climate crisis narrative, and&nbsp;<em>Time<\/em>&nbsp;was too uninterested in seeking and presenting the truth to investigate the extraordinary claim, instead reporting it as an unchallenged fact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When you look at satellite temperature data\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/uah-version-6\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">compiled by the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH)<\/a>, the \u201chottest January ever\u201d claim also falls apart:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"325\" data-attachment-id=\"302292\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=302292\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?fit=1920%2C864&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1920,864\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?fit=723%2C325&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?resize=723%2C325&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-302292\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?resize=1024%2C461&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?resize=300%2C135&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?resize=768%2C346&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?resize=1536%2C691&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?resize=1200%2C540&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?w=1920&amp;ssl=1 1920w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2024_v6_20x9.webp?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The satellite global temperature value is just 0.86\u00b0C, essentially half of what Copernicus claims at 1.66\u00b0C.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While it is not the globe, the United States (U.S.) is often cited as being a leading metric for climate change by both media and scientific sources. This is because the U.S. has more temperature stations per land area than any other region included in the global climatological network. As such, its readings have an outsized impact on global average temperature measurements. Yet when you\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/u-s-surface-temperature\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">examine the data from the US Climate Reference Network (USCRN)<\/a>, the best and most state-of-the-art surface measurement system in the world we find that not only was January 2024 not the hottest on the record it was below normal in temperature:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"331\" data-attachment-id=\"302293\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=302293\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-223.png?fit=921%2C422&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"921,422\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-223\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-223.png?fit=723%2C331&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-223.png?resize=723%2C331&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-302293\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-223.png?w=921&amp;ssl=1 921w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-223.png?resize=300%2C137&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-223.png?resize=768%2C352&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At -0.14\u00b0F (-0.08\u00b0C), there is certainly no cause for alarm about temperature in the United States. Yet&nbsp;<em>Time<\/em>&nbsp;does not mention any of these other sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It gets worse than the simple subversion of science by omission of critical facts.<em>&nbsp;Time<\/em>&nbsp;quoted a spokesperson for Copernicus in the article:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cRapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are the only way to stop global temperatures increasing,\u201d Samantha Burgess, deputy director of the Copernicus Climate Change Service, said in a statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That statement is nothing more than political advocacy calling for the reduction of greenhouse gases through restrictions of economies, rather than simply reporting the science. By using that quote,&nbsp;<em>Time<\/em>&nbsp;is complicit in pushing advocacy over science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Time<\/em>\u2019s article is yet another ugly example of mainstream media preferring to push an alarming climate change narrative rather than reporting all of the facts, in context, honestly, and without bias. Shame on&nbsp;<em>Time<\/em>&nbsp;for failing to adhere to the most basic journalistic standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An article in\u00a0Time Magazine\u00a0(Time) claims that January 2024 was the hottest ever on record for the planet. Titled,\u00a02024 Had the Hottest January on Record Following 2023\u2019s Hottest Year on Record\u00a0the article is based on a single source of temperature data. Data from multiple other sources of temperature measurements refute this claim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":302295,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"An article in\u00a0Time Magazine\u00a0(Time) claims that January 2024 was the hottest ever on record for the planet. Titled,\u00a02024 Had the Hottest January on Record Following 2023\u2019s Hottest Year on Record\u00a0the article is based on a single source of temperature data. ","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818056,691819743,691826700,691826966,691826965],"class_list":["post-302287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-propaganda","tag-january-2024","tag-reference-period","tag-time-magazine","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/OIG-2023-08-15T131137.784.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1gDB","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":263568,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263568","url_meta":{"origin":302287,"position":0},"title":"Hottest Year Coming Everywhere\u00a0Elsewhere","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/23\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Everyone has an agenda and packages data in support of their POV.\u00a0 Those who joined the anti-hydrocarbon crusade are bound to find and amplify any bit of global warming they can find.\u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Don%C2%B4t-panic-2.jpeg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Don%C2%B4t-panic-2.jpeg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Don%C2%B4t-panic-2.jpeg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0-Don%C2%B4t-panic-2.jpeg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268176,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268176","url_meta":{"origin":302287,"position":1},"title":"Hottest Year Misdirection June\u00a0Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/18\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Activists and their media allies are Hell-bent to spoil our summertime joy by stirring up climate fear to further their zero carbon agenda.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-560.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-560.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-560.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-560.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272864,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=272864","url_meta":{"origin":302287,"position":2},"title":"Climate Fact-Check July 2023 Edition","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The media is calling July 2023 the \u201chottest month on record\u201d and even the \u201chottest month in the history of civilization.\u201d Keeping in mind that July is typically the warmest month of every year, NASA satellite data indicate that July 2023 was the warmest July in the satellite record. But\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-456.png?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-456.png?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-456.png?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-456.png?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-456.png?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266850,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=266850","url_meta":{"origin":302287,"position":3},"title":"Earth Experiencing \u2018Hottest Day Ever\u2019 Is a Deliberate Lie","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The establishment media are reporting that the world this past week recorded its hottest day ever. Such claims are provable falsehoods and misinformation, designed to fool people into supporting government programs to address an asserted climate crisis.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate crisis\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate crisis","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-crisis"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-327.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-327.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-327.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-327.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287853,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287853","url_meta":{"origin":302287,"position":4},"title":"L A Times Fails to Comprehend the Difference between \u201cAverage Temperature Anomaly\u201d &amp; \u201cAbsolute Maximum Temperature\u201d Climate Data","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/13\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Watts Up With That? Essay by Larry Hamlin In the most recent L A Times\u00a0article\u00a0hyping \u201cthe hottest October on record\u201d the Times can\u2019t seem to get it right in understanding the critical differences between\u00a0\u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d\u00a0and\u00a0\u201cmaximum absolute temperature\u201d\u00a0data. The Times article references the global\u00a0average temperature anomaly\u00a0graphic noted below which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"average temperature anomaly\"","block_context":{"text":"average temperature anomaly","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=average-temperature-anomaly"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291766,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291766","url_meta":{"origin":302287,"position":5},"title":"NASA GISS Data Shows 2023 EL Nino Driving Global Temperature Anomaly Increases; NOAA Data Shows U.S. Nov. 2023 Temperature Anomaly Declining","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/18\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an\u00a0L A Times article\u00a0as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d and the \u201chottest November\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=302287"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302287\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":302296,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302287\/revisions\/302296"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/302295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=302287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=302287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=302287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}