{"id":301387,"date":"2024-02-12T10:52:20","date_gmt":"2024-02-12T09:52:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=301387"},"modified":"2024-02-12T10:52:23","modified_gmt":"2024-02-12T09:52:23","slug":"the-tip-of-the-iceberg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=301387","title":{"rendered":"The Tip of the\u00a0Iceberg"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s so special about climate science?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0MARK HODGSON<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In September last year, John Ridgway published here at Cliscep a piece titled Burn the Witch!<\/a>, about an article written by climate scientist Patrick T Brown in which he (Dr Brown) suggested \u201cthat journals such as Nature and Science were biased towards articles that are focussed upon a particular narrative.<\/em>\u201d In particular, as John reported, Dr Brown said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I knew not to try to quantify key aspects other than climate change in my research because it would dilute the story that prestigious journals like Nature and its rival, Science, want to tell. This matters because it is critically important for scientists to be published in high-profile journals; in many ways, they are the gatekeepers for career success in academia. And the editors of these journals have made it abundantly clear, both by what they publish and what they reject, that they want climate papers that support certain preapproved narratives\u2014even when those narratives come at the expense of broader knowledge for society. To put it bluntly, climate science has become less about understanding the complexities of the world and more about serving as a kind of Cassandra, urgently warning the public about the dangers of climate change. However understandable this instinct may be, it distorts a great deal of climate science research, misinforms the public, and most importantly, makes practical solutions more difficult to achieve.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inevitably, perhaps, those comments met with quite a backlash in climate-concerned circles. Whether the original claim, or the backlash against it, is more justified probably lies in the eye of the beholder, but at the time the wagons were vigorously circled in defence of the integrity of climate science. The claims made by Dr Brown were denied in a most determined way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A few months later, and the Observer published an article<\/a> with the heading \u201c\u2018The situation has become appalling\u2019: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point \u2013 Last year, 10,000 sham papers had to be retracted by academic journals, but experts think this is just the tip of the iceberg<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fairness, the claims about \u201cfake scientific papers\u201d were of a different order to the candid confession made by Dr Brown last September. As described by the Observer, the situation is truly dreadful. Tens of thousands of bogus papers are being published every year, and their number is increasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Medical research is being compromised, drug development hindered and promising academic research jeopardised thanks to a global wave of sham science that is sweeping laboratories and universities.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2023, so we are told, for the first time research journals retracted more than ten thousand papers in a year. \u201cMost<\/em>\u201d analysts believe this is just the tip of an iceberg of scientific fraud. Professor Dorothy Bishop of Oxford University is quoted as saying:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The situation has become appalling. The level of publishing of fraudulent papers is creating serious problems for science. In many fields it is becoming difficult to build up a cumulative approach to a subject, because we lack a solid foundation of trustworthy findings. And it\u2019s getting worse and worse.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem started in China, apparently, because promotion for young doctors and scientists working there depends on them having published papers. And so \u201cpaper mills\u201d cashed in by supplying fake scientific papers for publication. And now the problem is spreading like a plague \u2013 to India, Iran, Russia, former Soviet Union states and to eastern Europe. Journal editors are being bribed, and the paper mills themselves have established their own agents as guest editors, thus facilitating the publication of yet more false work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The next quote is from Professor Alison Avenell of Aberdeen University, who says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Editors are not fulfilling their roles properly, and peer reviewers are not doing their jobs. And some are being paid large sums of money. It is deeply worrying.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article concludes with another quote from Professor Bishop in Oxford:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

People are building careers on the back of this tidal wave of fraudulent science and could end up running scientific institutes and eventually be used by mainstream journals as reviewers and editors. Corruption is creeping into the system.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am grateful to the Observer for bringing this to our attention. I do have a question, however. Is this problem one that relates\u00a0only<\/strong>\u00a0to the particular area discussed in its article, namely medicine and drug development? Professor Bishop referred to \u201cmany fields<\/em>\u201d and said that \u201cit\u2019s getting worse and worse<\/em>\u201d. Also, we are told that it is likely to be only the tip of an iceberg. Could it affect\u00a0climate<\/strong>\u00a0science? And if not, why not? Why is climate science so special?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In September last year, John Ridgway published here at Cliscep a piece titled\u00a0Burn the Witch!, about an article written by climate scientist Patrick T Brown in which he (Dr Brown) suggested \u201cthat journals such as Nature and Science were biased towards articles that are focussed upon a particular narrative.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":301389,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"In September last year, John Ridgway published here at Cliscep a piece titled\u00a0Burn the Witch!, about an article written by climate scientist Patrick T Brown in which he (Dr Brown) suggested \u201cthat journals such as Nature and Science were biased towards art","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821248,691826877,691826876,691826879,691826878],"class_list":{"0":"post-301387","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-science-2","9":"tag-fake-scientific-papers","10":"tag-misinforms-the-public","11":"tag-observer","12":"tag-scientific-fraud","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/01_LaLO33fk1d-WYMPCs8MgvQ.jpg?fit=2600%2C1203&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1gp5","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":278142,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278142","url_meta":{"origin":301387,"position":0},"title":"Burn the Witch!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a long-established principle of scientific enquiry that if you want to understand the structure of something, then just give it a bang and see how it rattles. It is a technique that crops up in a number of different guises from seismography and spectrography to magnetic resonance imaging;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277539,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277539","url_meta":{"origin":301387,"position":1},"title":"Climate scientist whistleblower Patrick Brown reveals how the media\u2019s obsession with global warming manipulates the truth about wildfires \u2013 80% are ignited by humans","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Much reporting of the wildfires in Maui has said climate change contributed to the disaster by contributing to conditions that helped the fires to spark and spread quickly. The fires, which killed at least 115 people, are believed to have been\u00a0started by a downed electricity line, but observers have said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Global warming\"","block_context":{"text":"Global warming","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=global-warming"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0ap-maui-fires.jpg?fit=1024%2C742&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325648,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325648","url_meta":{"origin":301387,"position":2},"title":"Patrick Brown: The Social Feedback Loops Constraining Climate Science","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the realm of climate science, the focus is often on the environmental feedback loops that intensify global warming. However, the social feedback loops influencing the creation and dissemination of climate science are equally potent and far less scrutinized. These social mechanisms significantly shape the research landscape, often prioritizing narratives\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate science\"","block_context":{"text":"climate science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-Climate-Science.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-Climate-Science.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-Climate-Science.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-Climate-Science.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-Climate-Science.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282965,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282965","url_meta":{"origin":301387,"position":3},"title":"The First Rule of Climate\u00a0Club","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Climate Club reminds me on the brainwashed Hitler Youth. From Climate Scepticism BY\u00a0JOHN RIDGWAY You do not talk about Climate Club I don\u2019t know why I felt so strongly about this as a child, but learning about the Hitler Youth put me right off the idea of joining any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate activism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate activism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-activism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282036,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282036","url_meta":{"origin":301387,"position":4},"title":"Let No Lying Dog\u00a0Sleep","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Angry dog From Climate Scepticism BY\u00a0JOHN RIDGWAY The Grantham Institute barks You may recall that last month climate scientist Professor Patrick T. Brown of the Breakthrough Institute caused a bit of a\u00a0furore\u00a0by pointing out how extreme weather event attribution studies invariably restrict their quantification to climatic causation only, thereby excluding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Brief\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Brief","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-brief"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278013,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278013","url_meta":{"origin":301387,"position":5},"title":"Free Speech Fears Grow After Springer Nature \u201cMeekly Obeys\u201d Activist Demands For Alimonti Climate Paper Retraction","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Free speech is under attack in the politicised world of climate science and disgust at the recent cancellation of\u00a0Alimonti\u00a0et al. by Springer Nature continues to grow. Readers will\u00a0recall\u00a0that the paper written by four Italian scientists led by Physics Professor Gianluca Alimonti said past data did not point to a \u201cclimate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Censorship\"","block_context":{"text":"Censorship","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=censorship"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=301387"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301387\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":301392,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301387\/revisions\/301392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/301389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=301387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=301387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=301387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}