{"id":299827,"date":"2024-02-05T09:12:20","date_gmt":"2024-02-05T08:12:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299827"},"modified":"2024-02-05T09:12:22","modified_gmt":"2024-02-05T08:12:22","slug":"offshore-wind-has-a-big-up-and-down-week","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299827","title":{"rendered":"Offshore wind has a big up and down week"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By David Wojick<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The tumult in US offshore wind development has taken several steps lately, some forward, some not so much. Here is a quick overview of three serious events that are worth careful consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First is the question of whether the developers will be able to bring forward their cost crisis and stick it to the ratepayers. As regular readers know, a lot of offshore wind project contracts with the client States have been pulled by the developers. They hope to come back with a higher price to cover their suddenly increased costs. The big Danish developer Orsted just pulled another contract in Maryland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, the first of these new high-cost offers has indeed been accepted, in this case, by New Jersey. After all, the governor says, they want to go the impossible 100% renewables route as quickly as they can, making costs politically irrelevant. New Jersey ratepayers be damned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a good chance that the other North Atlantic states will follow New Jersey, especially New York, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, which have huge offshore wind construction targets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Possibly countering this big push for wind is a major new lawsuit that has just been filed. The complaint is here: https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/document\/700695015\/Offshore-Wind-Lawsuit<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This suit alleges something that is obviously true, having been widely discussed here at CFACT. The Federal agencies that have quickly issued the offshore wind permits have simply ignored the destructive environmental effects. This is especially true for the collective impact of combinations of nearby projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, the argument is procedural rather than substantive. Plaintiffs are not asking the Court to rule on the environmental science, which Courts are reluctant to do. They just want the Feds to do the proper job as mandated by the applicable environmental protection laws, of which there are several.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The complaint has two dimensions of consideration. One is the adverse impact of wind development on fish and, therefore, on the fishing industry. Thus, one of the complainants is a fishing trade association. One of my favorite legal maxims is \u201cNever argue substance when you can argue procedure.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other dimension is the adverse impact on endangered species, especially whales. One of the plaintiffs is the Save the Right Whale Coalition. Here, the narrow issue is the threat posed by enormous offshore wind development to the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Speaking of enormous, here is a good picture of one of the unbelievably huge monopiles driven into the sea floor to hold up an offshore wind turbine generator. The pile dwarfs the people. https:\/\/www.offshorewind.biz\/2023\/07\/03\/eew-rolls-out-first-ocean-wind-1-monopile\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The noise of this pile driving is extremely loud, disrupting the lives of whales and other endangered species. This disruption is not only recognized by the Feds, it is specifically authorized by NOAA. The disruption is called harassment, and every offshore project has a pile driving harassment authorization, which typically includes thousands of hapless marine mammals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That this systematic harassment can cause deadly behavior on the part of the thousands of harassed critters is one of the top ongoing complaints against offshore wind development. For example, scaring whales into heavy ship traffic where they can be struck and killed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which brings us to our third big event. The Feds have just released the final version of their so-called \u201cNorth Atlantic Right Whale and Offshore Wind Strategy\u201d. I say so-called because there is no strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Federal plan is to drive the thousands of piles on a bunch of big projects, many at the same time, and see what happens to the whales. The word \u201charassment\u201d does not even occur in the document. Deadly harassment is simply ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See https:\/\/www.fisheries.noaa.gov\/media-release\/noaa-boem-announce-final-north-atlantic-right-whale-and-offshore-wind-strategy<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the Right Whales go extinct, there is no way to bring them back, so watching and waiting is not a protection strategy. This is the kind of systematic denial that the lawsuit calls out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So there it is. The price of offshore wind may be going way up, but a lawsuit is asking for a more complete look at the adverse impacts. Meanwhile, the impact of offshore wind on severely endangered whales continues to be ignored by the development agencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The times they are a changing. Stay tuned to CFACT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The tumult in US offshore wind development has taken several steps lately, some forward, some not so much. Here is a quick overview of three serious events that are worth careful consideration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":299831,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"The tumult in US offshore wind development has taken several steps lately, some forward, some not so much. Here is a quick overview of three serious events that are worth careful consideration.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821207,691818301,691820753,691819094],"class_list":{"0":"post-299827","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-north-atlantic-right-whale","9":"tag-offshore-wind","10":"tag-orsted","11":"tag-renewable-green-energy","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Wind-Offshore-Farm.jpg?fit=1694%2C953&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1fZV","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325727,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=325727","url_meta":{"origin":299827,"position":0},"title":"Offshore wind is gearing up to bulldoze the ocean","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/03\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Biden Administration has recently produced a wave of plans and regulatory actions aimed at building a monstrous amount of destructive offshore wind. No environmental impact assessment is included.","rel":"","context":"In \"Net zero\"","block_context":{"text":"Net zero","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=net-zero"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0BlockIsland_016-large-1-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0BlockIsland_016-large-1-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0BlockIsland_016-large-1-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0BlockIsland_016-large-1-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0BlockIsland_016-large-1-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375094,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=375094","url_meta":{"origin":299827,"position":1},"title":"Offshore wind developers risk trouble with Trump","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/15\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"President Trump is clear about offshore wind. On day one of his second term, he signed an executive order titled \u201cTemporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government\u2019s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic Shores Wind\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic Shores Wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-shores-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Screenshot-2025-04-15-094751.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336985,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336985","url_meta":{"origin":299827,"position":2},"title":"Vineyard Wind Turbine Failure: Incident Details, Regulatory Response, and Industry Implications","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/19\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On July 13, 2024, an offshore wind turbine at the Vineyard Wind 1 project experienced a significant blade failure, leading to debris washing up on Nantucket\u2019s beaches and prompting a federal shutdown of the wind farm. This incident raises obvious questions about the safety and reliability of offshore wind projects,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"offshore wind turbine\"","block_context":{"text":"offshore wind turbine","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=offshore-wind-turbine"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Vineyard-Wind-1-Offshore-Windpark-Symbolfoto.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Vineyard-Wind-1-Offshore-Windpark-Symbolfoto.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Vineyard-Wind-1-Offshore-Windpark-Symbolfoto.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Vineyard-Wind-1-Offshore-Windpark-Symbolfoto.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0Vineyard-Wind-1-Offshore-Windpark-Symbolfoto.jpg?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371825,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=371825","url_meta":{"origin":299827,"position":3},"title":"Offshore wind construction is ignoring President Trump","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/25\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"President Trump\u2019s Day one Executive Order (EO) on wind power is a clear threat to the offshore wind projects that are under construction, but they seem to be ignoring this threat. I find no evidence that they are disclosing this threat to the public or their stockholders.","rel":"","context":"In \"Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW)\"","block_context":{"text":"Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=coastal-virginia-offshore-wind-cvow"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Offshore-wind-in-rows.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376205,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376205","url_meta":{"origin":299827,"position":4},"title":"Secretary Burgum: If offshore wind is wrong for New York, it is also wrong for Virginia!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/24\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Citing President Trump\u2019s\u00a0executive order\u00a0restricting offshore wind and a defective permitting process implemented by the Biden administration, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum\u00a0issued an order\u00a0on April 16 for the developers of the Empire offshore wind project to immediately stop construction.","rel":"","context":"In \"Coastal\u00a0Virginia\u00a0Offshore Wind (CVOW)\"","block_context":{"text":"Coastal\u00a0Virginia\u00a0Offshore Wind (CVOW)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=coastal-virginia-offshore-wind-cvow-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Offshore-wind-red-silhouette.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Offshore-wind-red-silhouette.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Offshore-wind-red-silhouette.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Offshore-wind-red-silhouette.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Offshore-wind-red-silhouette.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320427,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=320427","url_meta":{"origin":299827,"position":5},"title":"Major Setback for New York Renewable Energy Goals","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/23\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"According to a recent\u00a0article from Politico, New York State has decided not to move forward with three major offshore wind-energy projects. This decision came after General Electric Vernova (GE.N) altered the turbine design, which the state said \u201cmaterially altered\u201d the original plans.","rel":"","context":"In \"New York State\"","block_context":{"text":"New York State","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=new-york-state"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG.vexv09x7eceJyz8z.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG.vexv09x7eceJyz8z.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG.vexv09x7eceJyz8z.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG.vexv09x7eceJyz8z.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299827","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=299827"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299827\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":299833,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/299827\/revisions\/299833"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/299831"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=299827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=299827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=299827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}