{"id":297121,"date":"2024-01-19T12:48:07","date_gmt":"2024-01-19T11:48:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297121"},"modified":"2024-01-19T12:48:15","modified_gmt":"2024-01-19T11:48:15","slug":"feds-first-multi-site-offshore-wind-eis-is-ridiculous","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297121","title":{"rendered":"Fed\u2019s first multi-site offshore wind EIS is ridiculous"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" data-attachment-id=\"297125\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=297125\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1200,675\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=723%2C407&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?resize=723%2C407&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-297125\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?resize=1024%2C576&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cfact.org\/2024\/01\/16\/feds-first-multi-site-offshore-wind-eis-is-ridiculous\/\">CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cfact.org\/author\/dwojick\/\">David Wojick<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"482\" data-attachment-id=\"297123\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=297123\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?fit=2508%2C1672&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"2508,1672\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0British-Offshore-WInd\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?fit=723%2C482&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=723%2C482&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-297123\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=768%2C512&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=1536%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=2048%2C1365&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?resize=1200%2C800&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0British-Offshore-WInd.jpg?w=2169&amp;ssl=1 2169w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After numerous requests going back several years, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has finally published a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for a combination of coming offshore wind projects. Comments are due by February 27.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/document\/BOEM-2024-0001-0001\"><strong>See here for details and documents<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In his case, the EIS is for a cluster of six big projects in what is called the New York Bight. The Bight is a triangular indentation on the Atlantic coast bounded by New York and New Jersey. Think of it as the underwater mouth of the Hudson River.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In principle, this PEIS should identify and assess those impacts that arise from the combination of projects, over and above the individual project impacts. In fact, it does nothing of the sort. The result is simply ridiculous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most of the 800 or so pages are an eye-glazing academic discussion of the general environment, the sorts of impacts that might or might not occur, and what might or might not be done about them. There is basically nothing about this specific combination of projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The greatest concern is that the combined noise from these six projects will severely harm whales and other protected species. This is especially true for the incredibly loud noise from driving the monster monopiles that hold up the giant wind turbines. Construction of all six projects may occur simultaneously, piling on the noise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here, the PEIS is simply absurd. It is structured like a project EIS, so the pile-driving impacts are supposedly addressed in a technical appendix on \u201cacoustics\u201d. In this case, it is \u201cAppendix J: Introduction to Sound and Acoustic Assessment\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That it is labeled an introduction is the tip-off as it is basically an academic treatise. In fact, it starts off by explaining at length how underwater sound is measured. We do finally get to the Bight, but that is about it. What we find is a regurgitation of an academic paper that bears no resemblance to the six projects this assessment is supposed to be about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To begin with, it uses just two theoretical sites, with a mere 60 turbines each, for a total of 120. BOEM says these six real sites are expected to develop up to 7,000 MW of generating capacity. Recent site designs use 13 MW turbines, which would give about 540 turbines or almost five times more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the PEIS study uses noise levels from small 6 MW turbines. At that size, we are talking about more like 1,200 turbines, or roughly ten times as many as are considered. The potential impact of 120 turbines is clearly not helpful in assessing 1,200.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even worse, the pile driving noise level is for driving a roughly 20-foot diameter pile, which is very small by present and future standards. Today\u2019s 13 to 15 MW turbines use piles around 40 feet in diameter. Moreover, gigantic 20 MW turbines have just been introduced, which might take 60-foot diameter piles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The noise level is based on the energy of the pile driving hammer, and bigger piles take a lot more energy to drive, so there is a lot more noise. One wonders why BOEM did not measure the noise from the much bigger piles being driven back in July just off Rhode Island. The answer seems that BOEM did not want to put any serious work into this PEIS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, the academic acoustic case considered in the PEIS tells us absolutely nothing about the potentially huge noise impact of the six projects supposedly being assessed. There is literally no environmental impact assessment here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This vacuum seems to hold for pretty much the entire PEIS, although I have not read it all by any means. But I looked in a lot of places and have yet to find any real assessment of the six projects. There is certainly nothing of substance on noise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As environmental impact statements go, this one is a joke.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After numerous requests going back several years, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has finally published a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for a combination of coming offshore wind projects. Comments are due by February 27.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":297125,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"After numerous requests going back several years, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has finally published a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for a combination of coming offshore wind projects. Comments are due by February 27.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819488,691818430,691818867,691818301],"class_list":{"0":"post-297121","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-bureau-of-ocean-energy-management","9":"tag-new-jersey","10":"tag-new-york","11":"tag-offshore-wind","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Record-Breaking-Year-for-European-Offshore-Wind-in-2023-With-Positive-Outlook-and-Investments.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1fih","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244727,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=244727","url_meta":{"origin":297121,"position":0},"title":"Feds must reject Dominion\u2019s flawed wind farm application","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the agency charged with reviewing the matter, crafted a draft EIS that is \u201cwoefully inadequate\u201d in addressing potential impacts to severely endangered right whales.\u00a0","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-558.png?fit=1001%2C479&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-558.png?fit=1001%2C479&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-558.png?fit=1001%2C479&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-558.png?fit=1001%2C479&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286700,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=286700","url_meta":{"origin":297121,"position":1},"title":"CFACT to BOEM: Oregon\u2019s \u201cfloating wind\u201d experiment likely to topple over","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The principal reason that there are no commercially viable, floating wind facilities that exist inthe world today is because the cost to build, operate and maintain them is simply too exorbitant.Each turbine requires a massive \u201cfloat\u201d to support the turbine tower. Each tower float must bemoored to the bottom in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (\u2018BOEM\u2019)\"","block_context":{"text":"Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (\u2018BOEM\u2019)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bureau-of-ocean-energy-management-boem-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/085d9d7b3b72e36a2fa37472b0c66d812.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/085d9d7b3b72e36a2fa37472b0c66d812.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/085d9d7b3b72e36a2fa37472b0c66d812.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/085d9d7b3b72e36a2fa37472b0c66d812.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/085d9d7b3b72e36a2fa37472b0c66d812.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":397868,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=397868","url_meta":{"origin":297121,"position":2},"title":"U.S. Offshore Wind: Politics Giveth, Taketh","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"26\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Last Friday, the Daily Caller News Foundation broke an exclusive story that the U.S. had ordered a halt to construction on the offshore Revolution Wind Farm project. The article, \u201cTrump Admin Kills Massive Offshore Wind Project,\u201d\u00a0announced the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (Department of Interior).","rel":"","context":"In \"\u00d8rsted\"","block_context":{"text":"\u00d8rsted","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=orsted-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM5aSHyJfhzclTlrdvD6K6IX4BnDZpdMrRDE2wS524G23iw74cmiMR1eJjNAwKH7AA8Fxr5Y060cCoDCB0gjsAluaBzLP-UMnv0YWBjImaefr3_urSomKJpAHBuB3l1bnGKA2FkjjdciWqS5JwBuegwncaxjA-2.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256010,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=256010","url_meta":{"origin":297121,"position":3},"title":"RELEASE: Save the whales coalition warns NOAA \u2014 Don\u2019t allow more harassment from wind power","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dominion Energy recently submitted a \u201cRequest for Rulemaking and Letter of Authorization for Taking of Marine Mammals\u201d as dead whales have been increasingly washing ashore along the Atlantic Coast. The Save the Whale Coalition says that NOAA granting Dominion\u2019s request would prompt litigation to stop it.","rel":"","context":"In \"NOAA\"","block_context":{"text":"NOAA","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=noaa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/016632502-mmmainjpg-dceb482c98b20d05.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/016632502-mmmainjpg-dceb482c98b20d05.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/016632502-mmmainjpg-dceb482c98b20d05.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/016632502-mmmainjpg-dceb482c98b20d05.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/016632502-mmmainjpg-dceb482c98b20d05.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349117,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=349117","url_meta":{"origin":297121,"position":4},"title":"BOEM Finally Acknowledges the Harm Caused by Offshore Wind Farms","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In a surprising yet overdue move, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has released its Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the New York Bight. This document, despite its extensive layers of technical jargon and cautious language, marks a pivotal shift. It appears to be a rare admission\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biological Impacts\"","block_context":{"text":"Biological Impacts","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biological-impacts"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0attachment-wind-whale.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287975,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287975","url_meta":{"origin":297121,"position":5},"title":"CFACT issues \u201cintent to sue\u201d over offshore wind, releases new study","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"CFACT is not just talking about the tragic mistake of offshore wind, we are taking action. This week CFACT, partnering with The Heartland Institute, filed their joint intent to bring a lawsuit against the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for abrogating their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic right whales\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic right whales","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-right-whales"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Wind-turbines-fog-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Wind-turbines-fog-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Wind-turbines-fog-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Wind-turbines-fog-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Wind-turbines-fog-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297121","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=297121"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297121\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":297127,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297121\/revisions\/297127"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/297125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=297121"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=297121"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=297121"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}