{"id":294119,"date":"2024-01-07T12:07:56","date_gmt":"2024-01-07T11:07:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=294119"},"modified":"2024-01-07T12:07:59","modified_gmt":"2024-01-07T11:07:59","slug":"e-pur-si-muove","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=294119","title":{"rendered":"E pur\u00a0si\u00a0muove"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A few years back, some scientists got together and invented something they call the Living Planet Index, or LPI. It\u2019s supposed to measure how well (or poorly) the species that make up the living world are doing. They say it is a \u201cmeasure of the state of the world\u2019s biological diversity based on population trends of vertebrate species.\u201d<\/em> So it\u2019s an index based on the decline of some selected species, which is claimed to represent the decline of the species of the \u201cliving world\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s the big news from their latest report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Living Planet Index claims an average 70% decline in the populations of species worldwide since 1970.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

YIKES! 70% loss since 1970! EVERYONE PANIC!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But is this true?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over in the Twitterverse where I\u2019m @weschenbach, I said that based solely on my experience, their claim was nonsense. I\u2019ve spent a lot of the last half-century outdoors in the elements, both on land and on and under the sea, around the planet. I said I would have noticed a 70% reduction in species populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, folks who spend their lives behind desks in a city thought I was being ridiculous, and they laughed uproariously. How could I be so certain? Plus of course, there were the claims of \u201cBut Willis, those are actual scientists<\/strong>! How can you doubt them?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

So I thought I\u2019d take a look at some real data. Let\u2019s get a sense of the number of the species involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are estimated to be around 8.7 million species on earth. Of these, about 65,000 are vertebrates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How many of these 8.7 million species are studied by the Living Planet Index? Well, not all of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, no plants, no fungi, no chromista. Next, only vertebrates, and only some of those, specifically fish, mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The good news is that the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species<\/a>, which is the official keeper of data on which species are threatened or not, lists data for 62,493 vertebrates, so it covers pretty much all of the vertebrates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It also allows us to search based on various criteria, including those used by the LPI listed above.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And when we eliminate the vertebrate species the LPI doesn\u2019t include, we end up with 59,866 species fitting the LPI criteria\u2014mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and amphibians. Of course, they didn\u2019t look at all of them, only 5,230. But I wanted a larger view of the issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Red List also lets us see if the populations of each species are increasing, stable, or decreasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of the populations of the 30,763 of the LPI-studied mammal etc. species for which the Red List has population data, 53% have stable or increasing populations. So we\u2019re left with 14,565 species with decreasing populations. Call it half to be generous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s the problem. If around half the species for which we have data are stable or increasing, then even if the rest were all totally extinct, the average decline would only be 50% \u2026 far from the 70% they claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oooops \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Next, as a sensitivity analysis, let\u2019s assume every one of the 28,714 species for which we don\u2019t have the population trend is decreasing. Clearly, that\u2019s not possible\u2014some will be increasing or stable. And because the Red List is focused on threatened species, the unknown species will likely be weighted towards stable species. But it\u2019s a sensitivity analysis, so we\u2019ll assume every one of the unmeasured species is decreasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With that impossible assumption purely for a sensitivity analysis, it would mean only 27% of the species are stable or increasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the problem still remains. With 27% not decreasing, the only way to get to a 70% decrease in population is if almost every one of the 33,861 theoretically decreasing species is already extinct or on the brink of extinction. Only that impossible situation would give us a 70% average decrease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusions?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Out of 59,866 species fitting the LPI criteria for which we have population data, just over half are stable or increasing.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of the 59,866 species, only 8,509 are both\u00a0decreasing and\u00a0in some trouble (vulnerable or near threatened or endangered or critically endangered).<\/strong>\u00a0Here\u2019s the Red List Report:<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The endangered and decreasing fish, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and mammals are 0.001% of all species, and there\u2019s no reason to assume that their condition reflects the world situation.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 70% claim of the LPI is falsified by the Red List data.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As I said, I have investigated this because based solely on my experience, I said I didn\u2019t believe the LPI numbers, and folks laughed at that. And now, having studied the species data, I find that my experience is correct\u2014their claims don\u2019t hold water.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So how did the scientists behind the LPI get it so wrong? Obviously, their selected species are not representative of the whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I would suggest that Upton Sinclair had the answer to that. He said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIt is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The problem is, if the LPI was going up, or just slightly downwards, the scientists behind the LPI would be out of a job. To use George Orwell\u2019s term, that\u2019s doubleplusungood \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And almost inevitably, this leads to an unconscious bias in their choice of species, locations, and studies to include in the LPI. For the LPI, they\u2019ve studied 31,821 populations of 5,230 species. So no overt bias is needed\u2014just picking study A over study B because reasons, choosing population 1 over population 2, selecting species Alpha over species Beta, lather, rinse, repeat, and soon you have a 70% decline since 1970.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, please be clear that I\u2019m not<\/strong> saying that we should ignore population decreases. I\u2019ve been a commercial fisherman for a good deal of my life, and I\u2019d like my grandson to be able to do the same. The only way for that to happen is for us to care for the other life forms with which we share this magical planet. I\u2019m just saying that the LPI is just more unsupported alarmism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Best to all, and yeah, I\u2019ll continue to trust my experience despite people laughing at it \u2026 I\u2019m funny that way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

w.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A few years back, some scientists got together and invented something they call the Living Planet Index, or LPI. It\u2019s supposed to measure how well (or poorly) the species that make up the living world are doing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":294124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"A few years back, some scientists got together and invented something they call the Living Planet Index, or LPI. It\u2019s supposed to measure how well (or poorly) the species that make up the living world are doing.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691826049,691826048,691826051,691826050],"class_list":{"0":"post-294119","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-claim","9":"tag-living-planet-index","10":"tag-red-list","11":"tag-threatened-species","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.fDsa_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1evR","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244185,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=244185","url_meta":{"origin":294119,"position":0},"title":"Scientists Debunk Alarmist Claim That 69% of Vertebrates Have Declined Over Last 50 Years","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Two independent groups of scientists have destroyed the always improbable claim that vertebrates across the planet have declined by 69% since 1970.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-406.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-406.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-406.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-406.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-406.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298405,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=298405","url_meta":{"origin":294119,"position":1},"title":"Surfing The Sixth Wave","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"And if some given species, after millions of years of evolution, only exists in a tiny area of the planet, its odds of extinction are very high no matter what we do.","rel":"","context":"In \"bird extinctions\"","block_context":{"text":"bird extinctions","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bird-extinctions"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Mass-extinction_Great-Dying_Earth-Archives.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Mass-extinction_Great-Dying_Earth-Archives.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Mass-extinction_Great-Dying_Earth-Archives.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Mass-extinction_Great-Dying_Earth-Archives.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Mass-extinction_Great-Dying_Earth-Archives.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":383937,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=383937","url_meta":{"origin":294119,"position":2},"title":"Yet Another Darter-fish Invented to Stop Development","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Way down in Bessemer, Alabama,\u00a0the development of a huge data center is being fought with a time-tried and proven tactic\u00a0: \u00a0invent a new species of the darter-fish and declare it at once \u201cendangered\u201d.\u00a0 According to locals and environmental activists the new development would certainly spell doom for the little discovered-just-in-time\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Alabama\"","block_context":{"text":"Alabama","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=alabama"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Darters-illustration_full.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Darters-illustration_full.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Darters-illustration_full.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Darters-illustration_full.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Darters-illustration_full.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209076,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=209076","url_meta":{"origin":294119,"position":3},"title":"A \u2018Sixth Mass Extinction\u2019 Coming Up? Crunching the Numbers","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Paul MacRae In a popular textbook on writing creative non-fiction, the authors echo a familiar claim of global-warming alarmists: that thanks to our carbon emissions, we are creating a \u201csixth mass extinction\u201d that will wipe out most of the planet\u2019s animals and possibly humanity itself. The authors write: Your\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0massextinction-1.webp?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0massextinction-1.webp?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0massextinction-1.webp?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0massextinction-1.webp?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":422526,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=422526","url_meta":{"origin":294119,"position":4},"title":"Climate Change is Not Causing Mass Extinctions, Says Bombshell Royal Society Paper","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"When the history of the great Net Zero climate hoax comes to be written, pride of place will be given to the terrifying sixth mass extinction scare. Mainstream media barely question the idea that human-controlled climate is wreaking havoc with the life chances of millions of animal and plant species\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOVvf8azgd9dhGKZRD0LFueWveL1_10LQDwYtE8vFqaRgvhweHX-hSFAWvUIU-lvgzhSqTeTMmmgmdCd7a-7rPN_NFL-JCM5sEiIrFKLlPIOipfpFJ_ogUzv3OCr0BU-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOVvf8azgd9dhGKZRD0LFueWveL1_10LQDwYtE8vFqaRgvhweHX-hSFAWvUIU-lvgzhSqTeTMmmgmdCd7a-7rPN_NFL-JCM5sEiIrFKLlPIOipfpFJ_ogUzv3OCr0BU-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOVvf8azgd9dhGKZRD0LFueWveL1_10LQDwYtE8vFqaRgvhweHX-hSFAWvUIU-lvgzhSqTeTMmmgmdCd7a-7rPN_NFL-JCM5sEiIrFKLlPIOipfpFJ_ogUzv3OCr0BU-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOVvf8azgd9dhGKZRD0LFueWveL1_10LQDwYtE8vFqaRgvhweHX-hSFAWvUIU-lvgzhSqTeTMmmgmdCd7a-7rPN_NFL-JCM5sEiIrFKLlPIOipfpFJ_ogUzv3OCr0BU-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOVvf8azgd9dhGKZRD0LFueWveL1_10LQDwYtE8vFqaRgvhweHX-hSFAWvUIU-lvgzhSqTeTMmmgmdCd7a-7rPN_NFL-JCM5sEiIrFKLlPIOipfpFJ_ogUzv3OCr0BU-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279822,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=279822","url_meta":{"origin":294119,"position":5},"title":"UK migratory birds \u2018in freefall\u2019 over climate change\u2013BBC","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"British bird lovers will see a very different pattern of species as the climate warms, according to scientists.","rel":"","context":"In \"BBC\"","block_context":{"text":"BBC","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bbc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Birds-2-1076x717-1.jpg?fit=1076%2C717&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Birds-2-1076x717-1.jpg?fit=1076%2C717&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Birds-2-1076x717-1.jpg?fit=1076%2C717&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Birds-2-1076x717-1.jpg?fit=1076%2C717&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Birds-2-1076x717-1.jpg?fit=1076%2C717&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=294119"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294119\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":294125,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294119\/revisions\/294125"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/294124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=294119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=294119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=294119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}