{"id":292083,"date":"2023-12-20T20:23:07","date_gmt":"2023-12-20T19:23:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292083"},"modified":"2023-12-20T20:23:10","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T19:23:10","slug":"wind-curtailment-costs-to-rise-to-3-billion-by-2030","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292083","title":{"rendered":"Wind Curtailment Costs To Rise To \u00a33 Billion By\u00a02030"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

h\/t Ian Magness<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It appears that the BBC will print any nonsense it is handed by the renewable\/climate lobby:<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Wasted wind power will add \u00a340 to the average UK household\u2019s electricity bill in 2023, according to a think tank.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

That figure could increase to \u00a3150 in 2026, Carbon Tracker has estimated.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When it is very windy, the grid cannot handle the extra power generated. Wind farms are paid to switch off and gas-powered stations are paid to fire up. The cost is passed on to consumers.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The government said major reforms will halve the time it takes to build energy networks to cope with extra wind power.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most of the UK\u2019s offshore wind farms are in England \u2013 <\/em>Dogger Bank off the coast of Yorkshire<\/em><\/a> is the largest in the world. Meanwhile, around half of onshore wind farms are in Scotland but most electricity is used in south-east England.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carbon Tracker said the main problem in getting electricity to where it is needed is a bottleneck in transmission between Scotland and England.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The practice of switching off wind farms and ramping up power stations is known as “wind curtailment” and the costs are passed on to consumers, it said.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carbon Tracker researches the impact of climate change on financial markets. It said since the start of 2023, wind curtailment payments cost \u00a3590m, adding \u00a340 to the average consumer bill.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It warned those costs were set to increase to add \u00a3180 per year to bills by 2030, due to wind farms being built faster than the power cabling needed to transmit the electricity.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/business-67494082<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a start, they can\u2019t even get their numbers right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They say that wind constraint payments cost \u00a3590 million this year. Households however only use a third of electricity generated, so they are only directly paying about \u00a3196 million towards the bill. This equates to \u00a37 per home, not \u00a340.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They have also got their logic upside down. It is not \u201cwasted wind power\u201d, but the constraint payments that households are paying for. The answer is simple \u2013 refuse to pay them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem, of course, is not \u201clack of infrastructure\u201d, as they claim. It is that we ever built so many wind farms in Scotland, so far away from consumers, who will have to pay for all of this infrastructure as well. Yet we still have not learnt our lesson and are carrying on building even more. According to Carbon Tracker, constraint payments could rocket to over \u00a33 billion by 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n
Gone with the wind?<\/a><\/blockquote>