{"id":291766,"date":"2023-12-18T14:23:07","date_gmt":"2023-12-18T13:23:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291766"},"modified":"2023-12-18T14:23:10","modified_gmt":"2023-12-18T13:23:10","slug":"nasa-giss-data-shows-2023-el-nino-driving-global-temperature-anomaly-increases-noaa-data-shows-u-s-nov-2023-temperature-anomaly-declining","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291766","title":{"rendered":"NASA GISS Data Shows 2023 EL Nino Driving Global Temperature Anomaly Increases; NOAA Data Shows U.S. Nov. 2023 Temperature Anomaly Declining"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Guest essay by Larry Hamlin<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below<\/a>) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an L A Times article<\/a> as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d and the \u201chottest November\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This GISS anomaly value represents a November global absolute average temperature of 59.792 degrees F.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The prior highest measured GISS November global average temperature anomaly was in the year 2020 with a value of 1.10 degrees C (1.98 degrees F) which represents a November global absolute average temperature of 59.18 degrees F \u2013 a difference of 0.612 degrees F which the Times has hyped as being the \u201chottest November\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The highest prior GISS measured EL Nino year average temperature anomaly was in 2016 at 1.37 degrees C (2.466 degrees F) which represents an absolute temperature of 59.666 degrees F \u2013 a difference of 0.126 degrees F (1\/8th of a degree F) from the November 2023 EL Nino driven anomaly value. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate alarmist propaganda media misleadingly exaggerate the small average temperature anomaly differences between these measurements by deliberately concealing the specific numerical value of such differences<\/strong> and instead hyping these carefully hidden small differences as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d<\/strong> and the \u201chottest November<\/strong>\u201d even when the latest measured GISS global anomaly value is only 1\/8th of a degree F changed<\/strong> from the highest prior year 2016 EL Nino value<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The L A Times climate alarmist article continues to conceal and downplay the overwhelming importance of the large year 2023 El Ni\u00f1o event with the obvious impact that such a naturally occurring global wide climate event has in hugely increasing both absolute and anomaly temperature measurement outcomes around the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Times article ridiculously hypes (shown below) that November 2023 is the \u201csixth straight month to set a heat record\u201d that \u201chas truly been shocking\u201d with people \u201crunning out of adjectives to describe this\u201d when the\u00a0NASA GISS data shown above clearly establishes that this many month-long pattern of increasing anomalies is completely consistent with the year 2016 Global El Nino event which experienced 7 straight months of increasing anomalies from October 2015 through April 2016<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The GISS November 2023 global average temperature anomaly represents a mathematically derived composite average value of all global average temperature anomaly measurement data representing an extraordinary array of five disparate global climate regions (shown below<\/a>) along with the huge disparate climate behavior differences present in the global hemispheres with their unique and far flung oceans, continents, mountains, deserts, rain forests, low lands, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The mathematically contrived global average temperature anomaly result is created through a composite menagerie of widely disparate climate region data outcomes that apply to no specific region or location anywhere on earth<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, climate alarmist hyped claims of \u201climiting global warming to 2 degrees C (temperature anomaly value) above pre-industrial times\u201d are based on a climate model referred to as RCP8.5 that was rejected by Working Group I<\/a>, The Physical Science, of the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report (AR6, 2021).    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate alarmist propaganda media erroneously misrepresent the contrived global average temperature anomaly data in support of their hyped climate alarmists claims while ignoring and concealing extensive anomaly and absolute   temperature measurement data that conflicts with their highly contrived global average temperature anomaly driven methodology.     <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Extensive NOAA anomaly and absolute temperature measurement data is readily available for the Contiguous U.S that addresses both average temperature anomaly measurements as well as maximum absolute temperature measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The graph below shows\u00a0NOAA\u2019s average temperature anomaly measurements through November 2023<\/a>\u00a0for the Contiguous U.S. which clearly demonstrates there is\u00a0no increasing trend in the average temperature anomaly data for the Contiguous U.S.<\/strong>\u00a0using the most accurate USCRN temperature measurement stations that went into operation in 2005.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The NOAA November 2023 El Ni\u00f1o year average temperature anomaly value is 1.44 degrees F compared to the prior November 2016 El Ni\u00f1o year average temperature anomaly value of 4.88 degrees F.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, the highest measured NOAA Contiguous U.S. November average temperature anomaly value<\/strong> from the USCRN temperature measurement stations was also the November 2016 El Ni\u00f1o year outcome of 4.88 degrees F compared to the November 2023 El Nino year value of 1.44 degrees F. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The next highest NOAA Contiguous U.S. November average temperature anomaly outcomes following the 4.88-degree F year 2016 value occurred (highest to lowest order) in the years 2020, 2009, 2017, 2021, 2005, 2015 and then 2023 respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, the November 2023 Contiguous U.S. average temperature anomaly value is only the 8th highest measured by the USCRN<\/strong> for the month of November.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The L A Times alarmist article conceals the most relevant Contiguous U.S. year 2023 climate average temperature anomaly data available from its readers with that data clearly showing the lack of any record-breaking climate anomaly outcomes in the Contiguous U.S. region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, the Times article hypes a contrived global average temperature anomaly outcome that applies nowhere on earth while at the same time falsely positing that this contrived global anomaly outcome is relevant to the Contiguous U.S. region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NOAA climate data shown below<\/a> provides the November 2023 absolute maximum temperature measurements<\/strong> for the period 1895 to 2023 in the Contiguous U.S. that establishes the November 2023 outcome is only the 109th highest out of 129 maximum November temperature measurements recorded during the 1895 to 2023 period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The\u00a0NOAA data below<\/a>\u00a0provides\u00a0the maximum November 2023 year to date interval temperatures<\/strong>\u00a0in the Contiguous U.S. for the period 1895 to 2023 establishing that the year 2023 January through November absolute maximum temperature is only the 115th maximum temperature interval out of 129\u00a0 maximum interval temperature measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The\u00a0NOAA data below provides the absolute maximum temperatures for all months<\/a>\u00a0between 1895 and November 2023 for the Contiguous U.S. establishing that month of November 2023 is only the 592nd highest maximum temperature out of 1547 absolute maximum temperatures measured with the highest ever measured maximum temperatures occurring in the dust bowl era of the 1930s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA has extensive temperature measurement data available for 9 U.S. Regions as shown in their Map below with access to this data obtained through NOAA\u2019s Regional Time Series option at the links noted for the above graphs.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Without belaboring this analysis any further all NOAA\u2019s  9 Contiguous U.S. climate regions measured data establish that November 2023 does not represent the highest absolute maximum temperature for any of these regions regardless of whether one is evaluating just the month of November, the January to November period interval or all months over the period 1895 through November 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA also has data available for all 48 Contiguous U.S. states as well as for Alaska using NOAA\u2019s Statewide Time Series option available at the links noted above.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOAA data for California establishes that November 2023 does not represent the highest absolute maximum temperature regardless of whether one is evaluating just the month of November, the January to November period interval or all months over the period 1895 through November 2023 as\u00a0shown below<\/a>\u00a0where November 2023 is only the 602nd of 1547 absolute maximum temperature\u00a0outcomes during 1895 to November 2023 period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA\u2019s extensive and readily available climate data for the Contiguous U.S. (both average temperature anomaly and absolute maximum temperature measurements) clearly shows that climate alarmist propaganda claims of a \u201cclimate emergency\u201d (including such claims in the L A Times) are unsupported by NOAA average temperature anomaly and absolute maximum temperature climate data measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, this extensive NOAA data is deliberately concealed by climate alarmists while at the same time erroneously misrepresenting the critical climate science differences between maximum absolute temperature and average temperature anomaly data measurements. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an\u00a0L A Times article\u00a0as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d and the \u201chottest November\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":291782,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an\u00a0L A Times article\u00a0as being \u201ca new monthly record","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818721,691819743,691819287,691825438,691819218,691818397],"class_list":{"0":"post-291766","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-alarmists","9":"tag-climate-propaganda","10":"tag-el-nino-2","11":"tag-hottest-november","12":"tag-l-a-times","13":"tag-noaa","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1dTU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336717,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336717","url_meta":{"origin":291766,"position":0},"title":"NOAA\u2019s June 2024 Global Time Series Average Temperature Anomaly Declining Trends Eviscerates Alarmists Flawed \u201cClimate Emergency\u201d Claims.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NOAA has released its June 2024 updated Global Time Series average temperature anomaly data which demonstrates that the earth is experiencing declining trends of monthly anomaly values. This outcome signals the continued weakening of the most recent natural climate occurring El Nino event which commenced in the July period of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Climate_emergency_preview.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Climate_emergency_preview.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Climate_emergency_preview.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Climate_emergency_preview.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Climate_emergency_preview.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321771,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=321771","url_meta":{"origin":291766,"position":1},"title":"L A Times Cherry Picks & Misrepresents NOAA Climate Data to Exaggerate March 2024 U.S. and Global Temperature Outcomes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The L A Times\u00a0article\u00a0and headline shown below exaggerate the March 2024 U.S. and global temperature outcomes by cherry picking and misrepresenting data that mischaracterizes what the data actually shows.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333335,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=333335","url_meta":{"origin":291766,"position":2},"title":"NOAA\u2019s Updated 2024 Global Average Temperature Anomaly Trend Continues to Decline Indicating a Weaking El Nino and No \u201cClimate Emergency\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NOAA has updated its Global Time Series Average Temperature Anomaly data through May 2024 with the results clearly indicating that the year 2023\/2024 El Nino event continues to weaken as demonstrated by the data presented and discussed below. The NOAA data presented below uses a graph display interval of a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"average temperature\"","block_context":{"text":"average temperature","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=average-temperature"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0ea63f8a5b3fc78b38f04a71a9c0f648.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0ea63f8a5b3fc78b38f04a71a9c0f648.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0ea63f8a5b3fc78b38f04a71a9c0f648.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0ea63f8a5b3fc78b38f04a71a9c0f648.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0ea63f8a5b3fc78b38f04a71a9c0f648.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324994,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=324994","url_meta":{"origin":291766,"position":3},"title":"L A Times Editorial Claim that \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat\u201d is Unsupported by NOAA\u2019s Climate Data","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The L A Times published an Editorial claiming that the \u201cThe planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record breaking heat\u201d and mandates that a \u201cclimate emergency\u201d must be declared but then fails to present any data graph or tables in its editorial.","rel":"","context":"In \"California\"","block_context":{"text":"California","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292226,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292226","url_meta":{"origin":291766,"position":4},"title":"El Ni\u00f1o Behind High Temperatures in 2023 \u2013 Similar to 2016","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s been a vintage year for politicised climate fanatics playing their new pseudoscientific game of joining up the jots of individual weather anomalies and claiming we are all going to die unless we submit to a collectivist Net Zero Great Reset. \u201cWe are living through climate collapse in real time,\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0-2016-El-Nino.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0-2016-El-Nino.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0-2016-El-Nino.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0-2016-El-Nino.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0-2016-El-Nino.png?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362552,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362552","url_meta":{"origin":291766,"position":5},"title":"No, CNN and BBC, 2024 Wasn’t the ‘Hottest Year on Record’ When ALL of the Available Evidence Is Considered","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A number of mainstream media outlets have uncritically echoed the proclamation of 2024 being the \"hottest year on record,\" such as, CNN with a story titled, \"2024 Confirmed as World's Hottest Year on Record\", and the BBC with a headline that declared, \"2024 Confirmed as Hottest Year Ever Recorded.\" When\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2024\"","block_context":{"text":"2024","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2024"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/02024-earth-s-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2023-in-a-decade-of-record-breaking-heat-1736855882720_1024.webp?fit=1024%2C715&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=291766"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291766\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":291783,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291766\/revisions\/291783"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/291782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=291766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=291766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=291766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}