{"id":289330,"date":"2023-11-30T13:44:55","date_gmt":"2023-11-30T12:44:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=289330"},"modified":"2023-11-30T13:44:58","modified_gmt":"2023-11-30T12:44:58","slug":"energy-in-the-air","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=289330","title":{"rendered":"Energy In The Air"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"542\" data-attachment-id=\"289340\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=289340\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?fit=1536%2C1152&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1536,1152\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536&amp;#215;1152-1\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?fit=723%2C542&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=723%2C542&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-289340\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=768%2C576&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=1200%2C900&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=800%2C600&amp;ssl=1 800w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=400%2C300&amp;ssl=1 400w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?resize=200%2C150&amp;ssl=1 200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?w=1536&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>TL;DR<\/strong>: Ramanathan proposed that the \u201cgreenhouse effect\u201d could be measured as surface upwelling longwave minus top-of-atmosphere (TOA) upwelling longwave. However, this ignores the contributions to TOA upwelling longwave from 1) atmospheric absorption of solar energy, and 2) surface-to-atmosphere net energy transfer of latent heat of evaporation\/condensation and sensible heat. In addition, it also ignores variation in the proportion of upwelling and downwelling energy loss from the atmosphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the seminal paper \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/351027a0\">Thermodynamic regulation of ocean warming by cirrus clouds deduced from observations of the 1987 El Nino<\/a>\u201d by V. Ramanathan &amp; W. Collins, the authors proposed that we could measure the amplitude of the poorly-named \u201cgreenhouse effect\u201d directly. They said it was the upwelling longwave energy radiated by the surface, minus the amount leaving the top of the atmosphere. The difference, they reasoned, would be the amount of longwave radiation absorbed by the so-called \u201cgreenhouse gases\u201d in the atmosphere, principally water vapor and carbon dioxide. And this method of measurement of the \u201cgreenhouse effect\u201d has become the general practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sounds good, and I\u2019ve used that definition without really thinking about it \u2026 but closer examination reveals that there are two problems with Ramanathan\u2019s method.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">First, upwelling longwave radiation is not the only source of energy flowing through the atmosphere. Energy enters the atmosphere from three distinct sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Upwelling longwave energy from the surface that\u2019s absorbed by the \u201cgreenhouse\u201d gases in the atmosphere.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Solar energy that is absorbed by the atmosphere.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Net of the latent (evaporation\/condensation) and sensible heat transfer to-from the atmosphere.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Let me start with solar energy that\u2019s absorbed by the atmosphere. Here\u2019s a map of the global distribution of that energy flux.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"594\" data-attachment-id=\"289331\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=289331\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-640.png?fit=720%2C594&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,594\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-640\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-640.png?fit=720%2C594&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-640.png?resize=720%2C594&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-289331\" style=\"width:761px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-640.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-640.png?resize=300%2C248&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 1. Average absorption of solar energy by the atmosphere.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There are some interesting aspects of this. First, the major absorbers of solar radiation are clouds and aerosols. The cloudy areas in the deep tropics are an obvious case. Less obvious is India, eastern China, and eastern US, where aerosols increase the solar absorption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You can also see how the clear dry air over the Antarctic and Greenland ice caps means that little solar energy is absorbed by the atmosphere in those areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second source of energy flowing through the atmosphere is the sensible and latent heat loss from the surface to the atmosphere. Here\u2019s a map of where that\u2019s happening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"594\" data-attachment-id=\"289333\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=289333\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-641.png?fit=720%2C594&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,594\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-641\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-641.png?fit=720%2C594&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-641.png?resize=720%2C594&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-289333\" style=\"width:760px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-641.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-641.png?resize=300%2C248&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 2. Latent and sensible energy loss from the surface to the atmosphere. Average of CERES data, Mar 2000 \u2013 Feb 2022.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The large red areas in the oceans south of the Equator are where there are few clouds and trade winds, so evaporative and sensible loss from the surface to the atmosphere is high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, we get to the third source of energy flow to the atmosphere. This is the absorption of upwelling radiation by \u201cgreenhouse\u201d gases. But how much is absorbed and how much passes through?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unfortunately, the method of Ramanathan doesn\u2019t actually tell us. Remember that there are three sources of energy flowing to the atmosphere, not just one. So the TOA upwelling longwave flux is not a simple function of the surface upwelling longwave flux. Here\u2019s a graph of surface and TOA upwelling longwave that demonstrates their differences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"671\" data-attachment-id=\"289335\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=289335\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-642.png?fit=720%2C671&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,671\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-642\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-642.png?fit=720%2C671&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-642.png?resize=720%2C671&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-289335\" style=\"width:760px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-642.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-642.png?resize=300%2C280&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 3. Upwelling longwave radiation anomaly, surface and top-of-atmosphere (TOA).<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While there are some similarities, obviously there is more going on than just the absorption of upwelling longwave from the surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Next, here\u2019s a comparison of the changes in the three sources of energy flux to the atmosphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"674\" data-attachment-id=\"289336\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=289336\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-643.png?fit=720%2C674&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,674\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-643\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-643.png?fit=720%2C674&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-643.png?resize=720%2C674&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-289336\" style=\"width:760px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-643.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-643.png?resize=300%2C281&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 4. Change in sources of energy flux to the atmosphere<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now, this is curious. Upwelling longwave radiation from the surface has increased. Absorbed solar flux has increased, although only slightly. But latent\/sensible surface-to-atmosphere heat transfer has dropped \u2026 go figure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This demonstrates the first problem with Ramanathan\u2019s method\u2014the amount of TOA longwave is a complex function, not just of surface temperature and CO2, but also of latent\/sensible heat transfer from the surface to the atmosphere, and of the atmospheric absorption of solar energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But that is not the only problem. Here\u2019s the second one. The atmosphere loses energy both to the surface and to space. But the proportions of energy going up and down can change over time. Here\u2019s a graph showing changes in atmospheric radiative energy losses to surface and to space.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"679\" data-attachment-id=\"289338\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=289338\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-644.png?fit=720%2C679&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,679\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-644\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-644.png?fit=720%2C679&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-644.png?resize=720%2C679&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-289338\" style=\"width:760px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-644.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-644.png?resize=300%2C283&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 5. Energy losses upwards and downwards from the atmosphere<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Again, a most curious outcome. There are large swings in the energy loss to the surface and smaller swings in energy loss to space. But around 2015, there was a big shift, with much more energy going downwards to the surface. Why? No clue. I can\u2019t even guess at what controls how much atmospheric energy flux goes out to space versus how much goes down to the surface. What would determine that?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Net result of all of this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Well, I fear Ramanathan\u2019s method is simply not valid. There\u2019s no reason to assume that changes in the TOA upwelling longwave radiation are a result of changes in greenhouse gas absorption of surface radiation. They are also a function of atmospheric solar absorption and latent\/sensible surface-to-atmosphere heat transfer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In closing, I fear I don\u2019t see any easy way around this. Seems to me that to measure it directly, we\u2019d need a long record of spectrum-resolved gridded satellite-observed radiation data so we could tell by frequency which upwelling radiation is directly from the surface and which is from the atmosphere \u2026 and unfortunately, we don\u2019t have that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Settled science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here on our hillside, blessed rain. My very best wishes to everyone,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">w.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PS\u2014Please quote the exact words you\u2019re discussing. It avoids endless misunderstandings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Watts Up With That? Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach. TL;DR: Ramanathan proposed that the \u201cgreenhouse effect\u201d could be measured as surface upwelling longwave minus top-of-atmosphere (TOA) upwelling longwave. However, this ignores the contributions to TOA upwelling longwave from 1) atmospheric absorption of solar energy, and 2) surface-to-atmosphere net energy transfer of latent heat of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":289340,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"There are large swings in the energy loss to the surface and smaller swings in energy loss to space. But around 2015, there was a big shift, with much more energy going downwards to the surface. Why? No clue. ","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818076,691818296,691824888,691819233,691824889,691819657],"class_list":{"0":"post-289330","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-co2","9":"tag-greenhouse-effect","10":"tag-longwave-radiation","11":"tag-solar-energy","12":"tag-solar-flux","13":"tag-water-vapor","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Particle-Wave-Physics-Concept-1536x1152-1.jpg?fit=1536%2C1152&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1dgC","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281080,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=281080","url_meta":{"origin":289330,"position":0},"title":"An Unsettling Insight","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/29\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I got to thinking about the classical way to measure the very poorly-named \u201cgreenhouse effect\u201d, which has nothing to do with greenhouses. To my knowledge, this method of measuring the greenhouse effect was first proposed by Raval and Ramanathan in a 1989 paper yclept \u201cObservational determination of the greenhouse effect\u201c.","rel":"","context":"In \"atmospheric longwave (LW)\"","block_context":{"text":"atmospheric longwave (LW)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atmospheric-longwave-lw"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0earth-space-sun-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0earth-space-sun-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0earth-space-sun-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0earth-space-sun-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0earth-space-sun-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363125,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363125","url_meta":{"origin":289330,"position":1},"title":"Greenhouse Efficiency Insights","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/23\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Abstract:\u00a0Using the CERES satellite data, it is shown that over the last ~ quarter century, the increase in greenhouse gases has had\u00a0no detectable effect\u00a0on the global average surface temperature. On the contrary, the overall increase in available solar energy after albedo reflections is shown to be sufficient to explain the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Clouds\"","block_context":{"text":"Clouds","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=clouds"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/image-667.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/image-667.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/image-667.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/image-667.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219454,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=219454","url_meta":{"origin":289330,"position":2},"title":"A More Accurate Multiplier","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/18\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"And of course, since radiation emitted by an object can be used to determine the temperature, this metric also measures how efficiently the incoming sunshine is converted to surface temperature.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-873.png?fit=618%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-873.png?fit=618%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-873.png?fit=618%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217020,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=217020","url_meta":{"origin":289330,"position":3},"title":"Greenhouse Efficiency","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/02\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"We know the earth is warmer than expected. Nobody has ever come up with an explanation for that except the greenhouse effect.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-136.png?fit=1200%2C704&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-136.png?fit=1200%2C704&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-136.png?fit=1200%2C704&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-136.png?fit=1200%2C704&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-136.png?fit=1200%2C704&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":303995,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=303995","url_meta":{"origin":289330,"position":4},"title":"A Curious Paleo Puzzle","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/24\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Hmmm, sez I \u2026 looks like an interesting study. Paleo CO2\u00a0levels back to about 65 million years ago, which peaked at about 2000 ppmv.","rel":"","context":"In \"Atmospheric CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"Atmospheric CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atmospheric-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-CO2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-CO2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-CO2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-CO2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-CO2-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338145,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338145","url_meta":{"origin":289330,"position":5},"title":"The Return On Your Investment","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Energy Return on Investment (EROI) is a ratio for describing a measure of energy produced in relation to the energy used to create it. For instance the ratio would illustrate how much energy is used to locate, extract, deliver, and refine crude oil relative to how much useable energy is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0energy-return-on-investment-eroi.webp?fit=1012%2C500&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0energy-return-on-investment-eroi.webp?fit=1012%2C500&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0energy-return-on-investment-eroi.webp?fit=1012%2C500&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0energy-return-on-investment-eroi.webp?fit=1012%2C500&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=289330"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289330\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":289341,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289330\/revisions\/289341"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/289340"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=289330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=289330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=289330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}