{"id":287853,"date":"2023-11-13T19:13:26","date_gmt":"2023-11-13T18:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287853"},"modified":"2023-11-13T19:13:28","modified_gmt":"2023-11-13T18:13:28","slug":"l-a-times-fails-to-comprehend-the-difference-between-average-temperature-anomaly-absolute-maximum-temperature-climate-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287853","title":{"rendered":"L A Times Fails to Comprehend the Difference between \u201cAverage Temperature Anomaly\u201d &amp; \u201cAbsolute Maximum Temperature\u201d Climate Data"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"723\" data-attachment-id=\"287863\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=287863\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=1024%2C1024&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1024,1024\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-391\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=723%2C723&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=723%2C723&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-287863\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?w=1024&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=768%2C768&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=800%2C800&amp;ssl=1 800w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=600%2C600&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=400%2C400&amp;ssl=1 400w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=200%2C200&amp;ssl=1 200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=450%2C450&amp;ssl=1 450w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=60%2C60&amp;ssl=1 60w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?resize=550%2C550&amp;ssl=1 550w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Essay by Larry Hamlin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the most recent L A Times&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2023-11-08\/with-hot-october-temperatures-earth-is-virtually-certain-to-be-the-warmest-year-on-record\">article<\/a>&nbsp;hyping \u201cthe hottest October on record\u201d the Times can\u2019t seem to get it right in understanding the critical differences between&nbsp;<strong>\u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d&nbsp;<\/strong>and<strong>&nbsp;\u201cmaximum absolute temperature\u201d&nbsp;<\/strong>data<strong>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Times article references the global\u00a0<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0graphic noted below which shows the October 2023 global value.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"524\" data-attachment-id=\"287854\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=287854\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-386.png?fit=927%2C672&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"927,672\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-386\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-386.png?fit=723%2C524&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-386.png?resize=723%2C524&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-287854\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-386.png?w=927&amp;ssl=1 927w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-386.png?resize=300%2C217&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-386.png?resize=768%2C557&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">NOAA has also\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncei.noaa.gov\/access\/monitoring\/national-temperature-index\/time-series\/anom-tavg\/1\/0\">released its October 2023<\/a>\u00a0Contiguous U.S.\u00a0<strong>average temperature<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0outcome of 1.35 F (shown below \u2013 degrees F on the left hand scale) which climate alarmists have ignored and instead erroneously hyped the global wide October\u00a0<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0outcome as representing the\u00a0<strong>maximum absolute temperature<\/strong>\u00a0that applies to the Contiguous U.S. region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"680\" data-attachment-id=\"287856\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=287856\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-387.png?fit=975%2C917&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"975,917\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-387\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-387.png?fit=723%2C680&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-387.png?resize=723%2C680&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-287856\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-387.png?w=975&amp;ssl=1 975w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-387.png?resize=300%2C282&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-387.png?resize=768%2C722&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. Contiguous&nbsp;<strong>average temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;value is defined using the USCRN temperature network of measurement stations that commenced operation in 2005 that are&nbsp;specifically determined to meet siting standards that preclude urban heat island impacts from&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2015\/12\/17\/press-release-agu15-the-quality-of-temperature-station-siting-matters-for-temperature-trends\/\">distorting temperature measurements as occurs on the majority of USHCN temperature stations<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The NOAA October 2023 Contiguous U.S.&nbsp;<strong>average temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;value is only the 7th highest&nbsp;<strong>average anomaly value<\/strong>&nbsp;measured with prior year measurements for years 2016 (3.44 F), 2015 (2.72 F), 2021(2.29 F), 2014 (2.23 F), 2007 (1.85 F) and 2010 (1.46 F) all exceeding the October 2023 measured&nbsp;<strong>average<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The L A Times article\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2023-11-08\/with-hot-october-temperatures-earth-is-virtually-certain-to-be-the-warmest-year-on-record\">shown below<\/a>\u00a0once again misunderstands and misuses (as discussed in a prior WUWT article found\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/climaterealism.com\/2023\/10\/media-fails-to-examine-actual-data-in-making-hottest-summer-ever-claims\/\">here<\/a>) the critical difference (yet again) between\u00a0<strong>average temperature<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0data and\u00a0<strong>absolute maximum temperature<\/strong>\u00a0data by erroneously claiming that the October 2023\u00a0<strong>average temperature<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0represents the\u00a0<strong>\u201cthe hottest October on record\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0(note the Times articles photo caption) without understanding that such claims\u00a0can only be determined by use of\u00a0<strong>absolute maximum temperature\u00a0<\/strong>data\u00a0versus\u00a0<strong>average temperature<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0data.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"541\" data-attachment-id=\"287857\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=287857\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?fit=975%2C729&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"975,729\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-388\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?fit=723%2C541&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?resize=723%2C541&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-287857\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?w=975&amp;ssl=1 975w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?resize=300%2C224&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?resize=768%2C574&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?resize=400%2C300&amp;ssl=1 400w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-388.png?resize=200%2C150&amp;ssl=1 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Average temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;data represents a measure of the statistical difference between a specific month\u2019s&nbsp;<strong>average temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;and the long-term&nbsp;<strong>average temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;of that same months\u2019 prior measurements over a defined period of years.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Average temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;data&nbsp;<strong>does not represent maximum absolute temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;values with these latter measurements being required to support claims of&nbsp;<strong>\u201cthe hottest October on record\u201d<\/strong>&nbsp;as hyped by climate alarmists. &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The global wide&nbsp;<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;data represent the combined average of hugely varying global regional&nbsp;<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;values that cover the entire earth\u2019s surface with about 70% of that surface being over the world\u2019s oceans and about 30% being over the far-flung continents which are separated by tens of thousands of miles.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The land area of the contiguous U.S. region represents less than 1.9 % of the earth\u2019s surface and lies between a specific and defined region of latitude (about 25.84 degrees N to 49.38 degrees N) and longitude (about 66.96 degrees W to 124.67 degrees W) in the northern hemisphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Attempting to utilize a global wide&nbsp;<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;value to determine what&nbsp;<strong>absolute maximum temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;outcomes occurred in various defined regional global areas is absurd and invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the L A Times wants to address \u201c<strong>the hottest October on record<\/strong>\u201d it needs to use&nbsp;<strong>absolute maximum temperature<\/strong>&nbsp;data records instead of&nbsp;<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>&nbsp;data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">NOAA\u2019s Contiguous U.S. October\u00a0<strong>maximum temperature data<\/strong>\u00a0for the period 1895 to 2023 (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncei.noaa.gov\/access\/monitoring\/climate-at-a-glance\/national\/time-series\/110\/tmax\/1\/10\/1895-2023\">shown below<\/a>\u00a0) clearly establishes that October 2023 was only the\u00a0<strong>94th highest October maximum temperature<\/strong>\u00a0out of 129 recorded\u00a0<strong>maximum temperatures\u00a0<\/strong>with the highest ever measured October valueoccurring\u00a0in 1963.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"778\" data-attachment-id=\"287859\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=287859\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?fit=975%2C1049&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"975,1049\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-389\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?fit=723%2C778&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?resize=723%2C778&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-287859\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?resize=952%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 952w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?resize=279%2C300&amp;ssl=1 279w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?resize=768%2C826&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-389.png?w=975&amp;ssl=1 975w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Looking at NOAA\u2019s Contiguous U.S.\u00a0<strong>maximum temperature\u00a0<\/strong>data\u00a0for all months between 1895 and 2023, as\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncei.noaa.gov\/access\/monitoring\/climate-at-a-glance\/national\/time-series\/110\/tmax\/all\/10\/1895-2023\">shown below<\/a>, establishes that\u00a0the October 2023\u00a0<strong>maximum temperature<\/strong>\u00a0was only the 867th\u00a0<strong>maximum temperature<\/strong>\u00a0month out of 1546 recorded\u00a0<strong>maximum<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>temperature<\/strong>\u00a0months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"762\" data-attachment-id=\"287860\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=287860\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?fit=975%2C1027&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"975,1027\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-390\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?fit=723%2C762&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?resize=723%2C762&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-287860\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?resize=972%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 972w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?resize=285%2C300&amp;ssl=1 285w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?resize=768%2C809&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-390.png?w=975&amp;ssl=1 975w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the L A Times wants to make claims of \u201c<strong>the hottest month on record<\/strong>\u201d then it must use\u00a0<strong>absolute maximum temperature<\/strong>\u00a0data to do so and stop\u00a0<strong>erroneously<\/strong>\u00a0using invalid global\u00a0<strong>average temperature anomaly<\/strong>\u00a0data to falsely support its flawed \u201cthe\u00a0<strong>hottest month on record<\/strong>\u201d claims. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Watts Up With That? Essay by Larry Hamlin In the most recent L A Times&nbsp;article&nbsp;hyping \u201cthe hottest October on record\u201d the Times can\u2019t seem to get it right in understanding the critical differences between&nbsp;\u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d&nbsp;and&nbsp;\u201cmaximum absolute temperature\u201d&nbsp;data. The Times article references the global\u00a0average temperature anomaly\u00a0graphic noted below which shows the October 2023 global [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":287863,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"In the most recent L A Times\u00a0article\u00a0hyping \u201cthe hottest October on record\u201d the Times can\u2019t seem to get it right in understanding the critical differences between\u00a0\u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d\u00a0and\u00a0\u201cmaximum absolute temperature\u201d\u00a0data.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691824586,691824588,691819218,691824587,691818397],"class_list":{"0":"post-287853","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-average-temperature-anomaly","9":"tag-hottest-october","10":"tag-l-a-times","11":"tag-maximum-absolute-temperature","12":"tag-noaa","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-391.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1cSN","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291766,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291766","url_meta":{"origin":287853,"position":0},"title":"NASA GISS Data Shows 2023 EL Nino Driving Global Temperature Anomaly Increases; NOAA Data Shows U.S. Nov. 2023 Temperature Anomaly Declining","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for November 2023 was released (provided below) which shows an El Ni\u00f1o driven value of 1.44 degrees C (2.592 degrees F) with the November outcome hyped in an\u00a0L A Times article\u00a0as being \u201ca new monthly record for heat\u201d and the \u201chottest November\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/OIG-2023-07-29T140641.234.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283619,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=283619","url_meta":{"origin":287853,"position":1},"title":"Major Climate Alarmist Fail: \u201cThe Hottest Summer Ever\u201d that Never Was","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The \u201chottest summer ever\u201d is a failure by climate alarmist and the climate boogeyman media. Use your mind and don\u00b4t follow the climate propaganda. From Watts Up With That? Guest essay by Larry Hamlin A recent WUWT\u00a0article\u00a0addresses the failure by climate alarmist media and scientists to utilize NOAA\u2019s July through\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-433.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296653,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=296653","url_meta":{"origin":287853,"position":2},"title":"2023 \u201cEarth\u2019s Hottest Year on Record\u201d Claims Fail","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Alarmists further exaggerate global \u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d outcomes by claiming they represent a \u201cglobal climate emergency\u201d where \u201ctemperatures during 2023 likely exceed those of any period in the last 100,000 years\u201d with all this ridiculous climate alarmist propaganda based on an increased 2023 global \u201caverage temperature anomaly\u201d difference of 0.15\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2023\"","block_context":{"text":"2023","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2023"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/OIG.xIbeO_.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332759,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332759","url_meta":{"origin":287853,"position":3},"title":"Climate Alarmist Hype that May 2024 is the \u201cHottest\u201d Global Average Temperature Anomaly is Meaningless in the U.S. and at other global locations around the World","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The usual climate alarmists\u2019 suspects are at it again trying to use the scientifically flawed claim that a single May 2024 global average temperature anomaly data point can characterize that the \u201cworld\u201d must be the \u201chottest\u201d it\u2019s ever been as hyped below. Alarmists also grossly misrepresent that the earth has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/01355266.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/01355266.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/01355266.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/01355266.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/01355266.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321771,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=321771","url_meta":{"origin":287853,"position":4},"title":"L A Times Cherry Picks &amp; Misrepresents NOAA Climate Data to Exaggerate March 2024 U.S. and Global Temperature Outcomes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The L A Times\u00a0article\u00a0and headline shown below exaggerate the March 2024 U.S. and global temperature outcomes by cherry picking and misrepresenting data that mischaracterizes what the data actually shows.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1984-orwell-big-brother-xl-hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288503,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=288503","url_meta":{"origin":287853,"position":5},"title":"The Fifth National Climate Assessment Report is Driven by Government Deception &amp; Climate Alarmist Politics","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Watts Up With That? Guest essay by Larry Hamlin The U.S. Government recently released the Fifth National Climate Assessment report which\u00a0falsely claims\u00a0that: \u201cThe climate change signal is \u201ceven clearer today than it was five years ago,\u201d Hayhoe said. In the U.S., people across all regions are experiencing hotter temperatures\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/slide-16-1024.webp?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/slide-16-1024.webp?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/slide-16-1024.webp?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/slide-16-1024.webp?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=287853"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287853\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":287864,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287853\/revisions\/287864"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/287863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=287853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=287853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=287853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}