{"id":287059,"date":"2023-11-07T21:23:23","date_gmt":"2023-11-07T20:23:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287059"},"modified":"2023-11-07T21:23:27","modified_gmt":"2023-11-07T20:23:27","slug":"energy-scale-nuclear-powered-future-means-thinking-big-acting-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287059","title":{"rendered":"Energy Scale: Nuclear Powered Future Means Thinking Big & Acting\u00a0Now"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Small modular reactors (SMRs) are disrupting conventional notions surrounding nuclear power. Smaller, more compact, and producing minimal emissions, this innovative alternative to traditional nuclear power is receiving more public and private sector attention as governments across the world scramble to meet global energy needs reliably and responsibly.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From STOP THESE THINGS<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

When it comes to reliable and affordable power, big truly is beautiful. There has been plenty of focus on Small Modular Reactors which, in time, promise to revolutionise the generation and distribution of electricity. However, in the here and now, in Australia the heavy lifting is being done by large-scale coal-fired generators, with gas, diesel and kerosene being used for turbine and piston-engined generation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Occasional bursts of wind power and solar power (weather and wind permitting) get thrust into the grid, allowing operators to collect $billions in subsidies every year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those subsidies are helping to destroy what\u2019s left of Australia\u2019s reliable coal-fired power fleet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What replaces those reliable 24 x 365 generators is a matter of delusional faith (on the one hand) and unmitigated anxiety-filled realism (on the other).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The cult that thinks chaotically intermittent wind and solar, backed up by mythical mega-batteries, can replace coal-fired power plants have another thing coming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, as Peter Smith explains below, those pinning their hopes on SMRs as an immediate fix to Australia\u2019s power woes also need a reality check.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Smith has to say about maintaining Australia\u2019s coal-fired power generation fleet, and progressively upgrading it with High Efficiency Low Emission plants makes perfect sense. However, over the longer term, large-scale nuclear power plants are an obvious choice for a uranium rich country like Australia. Whether Australia\u2019s notionally conservative Liberal party has the stomach for either path is an open question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nuclear or Net Zero. It Can\u2019t be Both<\/strong>
Quadrant
Peter Smith
30 October 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It seems clear that the Coalition will go to the next election with an incoherent energy-cum-climate change policy. Sticking with net zero and going nuclear won\u2019t mix. Pursuing the first will effectively rule out the second.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Coalition is very unlikely to propose building any conventional large-scale nuclear reactors. It will punt for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), each providing up to 300MW. For example, numbers of them would have to be linked to provide the comparable electricity supply of our largest coal power station. At full capacity, Eraring generates 2880MW.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Westinghouse, which is developing SMRs, recently provided a projected cost<\/a> of US$1 billion for its 300MW model. That\u2019s about $1.5 billion in Australian dollars. So Eraring\u2019s power generation<\/em> could be replaced for something upwards of $15 billion once all costs have been factored in. A lot of money, but a lot less than the $25 billion or more it would likely eventually cost (including transmissions lines) for storing<\/em> much less power via Snowy 2.0. Assuming Snowy 2.0 is completed; which, clearly, it won\u2019t be. It\u2019s simply a case of when it will be put out of its misery. Cancel Malcolm Turnbull\u2019s prime ministerial pension in small recompense for the sunk cost? Just an idle thought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Eraring is just one of the remaining coal-power plants for the chop. Speaking at climate \u201csummits\u201d in July<\/a> and again in October<\/a>, Daniel Westerman, the CEO of AEMO, said that the \u201chistoric mainstay of the power system \u2014 coal-fired generation \u2014 is on the way out \u2026 two-thirds of coal, or 14GW, could exit the market in six-and-a-half years\u2019 time.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relacing fourteen gigawatts of coal would take some 47 SMRs at a cost of about $70 billion-plus. Now we\u2019re talking real money? Not so much. After all, Net Zero Australia, a partnership between the University of Melbourne, the University of Queensland, Princeton University and an international consultancy group, reported<\/a>, also in July, that Australia would need to spend \u201cup to $9 trillion on the transition in the next 37 years;\u201d and, of this, $1.5 trillion by the end of the decade. Silly, unachievable, amounts of money. Still, it puts a mere $70 billion in perspective. It\u2019s peanuts. So the Coalition and Australia are on a nuclear winner? Not so fast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Westinghouse said<\/a> it hoped to have its first (300MW) SMR operating in the United States by 2033. That\u2019s ten years away and we are a long way from adding Australia to the queue of orders. And I assume that Westinghouse won\u2019t be a laggard among the major companies developing<\/a> SMRs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What will Australia need to do before joining the queue and putting in its order? First, the Coalition will need to win the next election and probably the one after that. Second, it will need have the existing legal prohibition on nuclear energy overturned by the Parliament. That means getting a bill passed by the Senate. Third, it will need to identify sites for the SMRs and, critically, for high-level waste disposal. Watch out for underground bones, spiritual connections, and leftist judges of a development-denying turn of mind. Good luck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But suppose a miracle happens and Mr Dutton eventually puts in an order. I would say you could put things on the same footing as the delivery of the first Australian-made SSN-AUKUS nuclear submarine. To wit, the early 2040s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before I go on, let\u2019s never forget, when logically preferencing reliable and continuous nuclear power over unreliable and intermittent wind, solar and pathetic battery power, that refurbishing existing coal-power plants and building new efficient ones is much the best option. It is a tragedy of our age that the climate-change hoax has pretty well ruled that out. The United Nations, the EU, the ABC, the Greens, inner-city latte-sippers, Greta Thunberg, renewable-energy carpetbaggers, and many notables, would all howl. One Nation might stand up to it. The Coalition? Hardly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But back to where I left off, nuclear by the early 2040s. Not so bad? Sadly, it is<\/em> so bad. It\u2019s too late. Westerman\u2019s not for waiting. He\u2019s a glass half-full man to whom dire predicaments are opportunities. Apropos:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our Integrated System Plan is clear that investment is needed at scale. Generation from wind and solar, energy storage systems and other firming capacity, and transmission, all need urgent investment to ensure the lights stay on as our coal-fired power stations retire \u2026 the east coast power system needs to triple the amount of grid scale solar and wind by 2030, and triple it again by 2050, from 16 GW today to 141 GW by 2050, while storage needs to expand by a factor [of] 30\u2026to 60 GW. That\u2019s a big economic opportunity in anyone\u2019s language, all in the best interests of energy consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Letting this \u201cbig economic opportunity\u201d slip is not on Westerman\u2019s agenda, nor more broadly is it on the agenda of climate influencers and potentates. While things aren\u2019t going nearly as well as hoped. Increasing costs, shortages of skilled manpower and pesky objections to ugly wind, solar and transmission eruptions are slowing progress. Nonetheless, the ship has sailed and, even if they win, no bunch of pantywaist Libs, hitched to net zero, will take enough wind out of its sails (if you\u2019ll forgive the metaphorical pun). By the 2040s, the nuclear option will have come too late to save the day. Too much will have been invested in destroying coal and erecting wind and sun totems to reverse course.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Picture if you will an elderly Dutton weeping over the energy carnage as he pens his memoirs. If only he\u2019d ditched net zero and plumped for coal until nuclear arrived. Yes, he won the 2024 election with a nuclear pitch. Alas, that net-zero albatross eventually did him in. What, not another blackout, he sighed, as he put down his quill in the dark.
Quadrant<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Small modular reactors (SMRs) are disrupting conventional notions surrounding nuclear power. Smaller, more compact, and producing minimal emissions, this innovative alternative to traditional nuclear power is receiving more public and private sector attention as governments across the world scramble to meet global energy needs reliably and responsibly. From STOP THESE THINGS When it comes to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":287066,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Small modular reactors (SMRs) are disrupting conventional notions surrounding nuclear power. Smaller, more compact, and producing minimal emissions, this innovative alternative to traditional nuclear power is receiving more public and private sector atten","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818216,691818154,691818206,691822517,691820172],"class_list":{"0":"post-287059","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-australia","9":"tag-net-zero","10":"tag-nuclear-power","11":"tag-small-modular-reactors-smrs","12":"tag-the-greens","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0smr-power-cost.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1cFZ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377686,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=377686","url_meta":{"origin":287059,"position":0},"title":"The Rise of the First SMR in the US: A New Chapter in Pragmatic Energy Innovation","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/05\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A quiet energy revolution is underway in the heart of West Texas. Abilene, a small town on the edge of the Permian Basin\u2014America\u2019s largest oil-producing region\u2014is now home to the first Small Modular Reactor (SMR) under construction in the United States. In a moment laced with irony and historical significance,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"molten salt technology\"","block_context":{"text":"molten salt technology","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=molten-salt-technology"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0brewbart_a_small_modular_nuclear_reactor_photorealistic_4k_d90a9ee9-cf1b-4130-b190-e6f200a50699.png?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0brewbart_a_small_modular_nuclear_reactor_photorealistic_4k_d90a9ee9-cf1b-4130-b190-e6f200a50699.png?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0brewbart_a_small_modular_nuclear_reactor_photorealistic_4k_d90a9ee9-cf1b-4130-b190-e6f200a50699.png?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0brewbart_a_small_modular_nuclear_reactor_photorealistic_4k_d90a9ee9-cf1b-4130-b190-e6f200a50699.png?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0brewbart_a_small_modular_nuclear_reactor_photorealistic_4k_d90a9ee9-cf1b-4130-b190-e6f200a50699.png?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242611,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=242611","url_meta":{"origin":287059,"position":1},"title":"SMR Gold Rush: Smart Money Backing Small Modular Nuclear Reactors","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Europe\u2019s energy crisis is all down to its delusional reliance upon intermittent wind and solar, which is why the smart money is backing nuclear power, at any scale, including Small Modular Reactors.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281638,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=281638","url_meta":{"origin":287059,"position":2},"title":"Six companies chosen for UK nuclear tech\u00a0contest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Tallbloke's Talkshop October 2, 2023 by\u00a0oldbrew There\u2019s a yawning gap of a decade or so between the end of UK coal-fired power stations\u00a0in late 2024\u00a0and the hoped-for arrival of its potential replacement, new SMR nuclear power.\u2013 \u2013 \u2013 Six companies have been selected to advance in the Small Modular\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Great British Nuclear\"","block_context":{"text":"Great British Nuclear","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=great-british-nuclear"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245401,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=245401","url_meta":{"origin":287059,"position":3},"title":"USA Leads Charge On Small Modular Reactors With NuScale Design Ready For Construction","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced\u00a0the first-ever certification Friday of a small modular reactor design, a big step in the process of developing a new generation of new and more flexible nuclear reactors.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295143,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=295143","url_meta":{"origin":287059,"position":4},"title":"Nuclear revival needs a new regulatory framework","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bad as the regulatory time frame is for large nuclear facilities, it is even worse (though technically the same) for companies desiring to bring new-design small modular reactors (SMRs) and micro SMRs to market.","rel":"","context":"In \"France\"","block_context":{"text":"France","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=france"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250963,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=250963","url_meta":{"origin":287059,"position":5},"title":"Serious Energy: UK ‘to class nuclear as\u00a0environmentally sustainable’","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK's Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has announced that nuclear will \"subject to consultation, be classed as environmentally sustainable in our green taxonomy\" - he also launched a competition, to be completed by the end of the year, which could lead to co-funding for small modular reactors (SMRs).","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0NuScale_Reactor_Building_SideA_Final-HIGH-RES.jpg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0NuScale_Reactor_Building_SideA_Final-HIGH-RES.jpg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0NuScale_Reactor_Building_SideA_Final-HIGH-RES.jpg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0NuScale_Reactor_Building_SideA_Final-HIGH-RES.jpg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0NuScale_Reactor_Building_SideA_Final-HIGH-RES.jpg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287059","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=287059"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287059\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":287068,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287059\/revisions\/287068"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/287066"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=287059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=287059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=287059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}