{"id":286535,"date":"2023-11-04T19:05:25","date_gmt":"2023-11-04T18:05:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=286535"},"modified":"2023-11-04T19:05:28","modified_gmt":"2023-11-04T18:05:28","slug":"colorado-river-flow-data-disproves-climate-change-warming-computer-model-flow-reduction-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=286535","title":{"rendered":"Colorado River Flow Data Disproves \u201cClimate Change Warming\u201d Computer Model Flow Reduction Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"407\" data-attachment-id=\"286549\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286549\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?fit=2400%2C1350&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"2400,1350\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-101\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?fit=723%2C407&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=723%2C407&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286549\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=1024%2C576&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=768%2C432&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=1536%2C864&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=2048%2C1152&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?resize=1200%2C675&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-101.png?w=2169&amp;ssl=1 2169w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The next question is, does climate change even predict future reductions of precipitation over the Colorado River watershed? The following plot shows an average of 183 climate model simulations of average yearly precipitation in an area approximating the Colorado River watershed. The models suggest a slight increase in total precipitation with warming.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"723\" data-attachment-id=\"286547\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286547\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?fit=1500%2C1500&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1500,1500\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?fit=723%2C723&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=723%2C723&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286547\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=1024%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=768%2C768&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=1200%2C1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=800%2C800&amp;ssl=1 800w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=600%2C600&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=400%2C400&amp;ssl=1 400w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=200%2C200&amp;ssl=1 200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=450%2C450&amp;ssl=1 450w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=60%2C60&amp;ssl=1 60w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?resize=550%2C550&amp;ssl=1 550w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?w=1500&amp;ssl=1 1500w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&nbsp;Guest essay by Larry Hamlin<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ocregister.com\/2023\/10\/30\/colorado-river-negotiations-2026\/?utm_email=E4DC8441B512758295E9C428EC&amp;active=no&amp;utm_source=listrak&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=https:\/\/www.ocregister.com\/2023\/10\/30\/colorado-river-negotiations-2026\/&amp;utm_campaign=scng-ocr-localist&amp;utm_content=curated\">Orange County Register published a prior Denver Post article<\/a>\u00a0claiming that \u201cclimate change warming\u201d had caused a 20% reduction in Colorado River flow since 1900 as shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"686\" data-attachment-id=\"286536\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286536\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-95.png?fit=720%2C686&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,686\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-95\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-95.png?fit=720%2C686&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-95.png?resize=720%2C686&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286536\" style=\"width:760px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-95.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-95.png?resize=300%2C286&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Denver Post article (as published in the Orange County Register) notes:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFirst, the river is drying as the West becomes warmer and more arid. Warmer temperatures speed evaporation, further reducing a lack of water from less precipitation. One&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/news\/colorado-river-flow-dwindles-warming-driven-loss-reflective-snow-energizes-evaporation\"><strong>report<\/strong>&nbsp;by the U.S. Geological Survey<\/a>&nbsp;found the Colorado River\u2019s flows have dropped by 20% since 1900 primarily due to warming.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/news\/colorado-river-flow-dwindles-warming-driven-loss-reflective-snow-energizes-evaporation\">U.S. Geological Survey&nbsp;<strong>report<\/strong>&nbsp;referenced<\/a>&nbsp;in the Denver Post article then references a February 2020&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.usgs.gov\/publication\/70209076\"><strong>study<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>\u201crecently published in Science\u201d<\/strong><\/a><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>which notes:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe sensitivity of river discharge to climate-system warming is highly uncertain, and the processes that govern river discharge are poorly understood, which impedes climate-change adaptation.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA&nbsp;<strong>Monte Carlo simulation<\/strong>&nbsp;with a radiation-aware hydrologic model resolves the longstanding, wide disparity in sensitivity estimates and reveals the controlling physical processes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This&nbsp;<strong>computer model simulation<\/strong>&nbsp;is then used to \u201cestimate\u201d&nbsp;the following outcome for Colorado River flows as:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe estimate that annual mean discharge has been decreasing by 9.3% per degree Celsius of warming because of increased evapotranspiration, mainly driven by snow loss and a consequent decrease in reflection of solar radiation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thus, the claim that \u201cthe Colorado River flows have dropped by 20% since 1900 primarily due to warming\u201d is driven by a \u201ccomputer model simulation\u201d which was intended to reveal the \u201ccontrolling physical processes\u201d regarding Colorado River flows into Lake Mead.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Denver Post article never addresses any measured data regarding Colorado River flows into Lake Mead with this data readily available from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation covering the period from 1930-2019.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Additionally, neither data of the Upper Colorado River Basin Snowpack levels during this same period that feed the Colorado River nor data of the changing supply and demands from the Colorado River water\u2019s many users during this period is addressed in the Denver Post article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The peer review \u201cstudy\u201d published in Science assumes the lower levels of Lake Mead are caused by reduced flows from the Colorado River and then uses a \u201cMonte Carlo simulation\u201d computer model to determine how \u201cclimate change warming\u201d caused this reduced flow of the Colorado that resulted in lower water levels in Lake Mead. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Climate scientist&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.drroyspencer.com\/2022\/08\/lake-mead-low-water-levels-part-2-colorado-river-inflow-variations-and-trend\/\">Dr. Roy Spencer evaluated measurement records of inflows<\/a>&nbsp;of the Colorado River at Lees Ferry starting in the 1930s as well as measurements of snow levels at the upper Colorado basis over this period which is the primary source supplying Colorado River flows arriving at Lees Ferry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dr. Spencer\u2019s study and analysis of measured data regarding the Lake Mead Elevation changes since 1940 and the Colorado inflows since 1930 is shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"336\" height=\"720\" data-attachment-id=\"286538\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286538\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-96.png?fit=336%2C720&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"336,720\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-96\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-96.png?fit=336%2C720&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-96.png?resize=336%2C720&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286538\" style=\"width:438px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-96.png?w=336&amp;ssl=1 336w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-96.png?resize=140%2C300&amp;ssl=1 140w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Key highlights from the study are noted as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Contrary to claims that drought is causing Lake Mead water levels to fall, the Colorado River natural flows into Lake Mead show no long-term trend since 1930.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Decadal time scale variations in river flow do occur, though, related to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Since about 2000, use of Lake Mead water has exceeded river inflow, causing water levels to drop. The negative phase of the PDO since that time has exacerbated the problem.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Data from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) establish that there has been\u00a0<strong>no long term-term trend in the natural Colorado River flow into Lake Mead<\/strong>\u00a0as shown in detail below from Figure 1 of Dr. Spencer\u2019s study.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"490\" data-attachment-id=\"286539\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286539\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-97.png?fit=720%2C490&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,490\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-97\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-97.png?fit=720%2C490&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-97.png?resize=720%2C490&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286539\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-97.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-97.png?resize=300%2C204&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Data from snowmelt in the Upper Colorado River Basin Snowpack that feeds the water entering Lake Mead is shown below in Figure 3 of Dr. Spencer\u2019s study which shows there is\u00a0<strong>no long-term trend in snowpack measurements in the period 1938-2022<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"478\" data-attachment-id=\"286541\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286541\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-98.png?fit=720%2C478&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,478\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-98\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-98.png?fit=720%2C478&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-98.png?resize=720%2C478&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286541\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-98.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-98.png?resize=300%2C199&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dr. Spencer\u2019s study addresses the declining water levels of Lake Mead since about year 2000 by establishing that downstream water user demands have significantly exceeded water input into the lake as shown in Figure 2 below from a Bureau of Reclamation study published in 2012 that identified this excessive Colorado River water demand problem issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"478\" data-attachment-id=\"286542\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286542\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-99.png?fit=720%2C478&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,478\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-99\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-99.png?fit=720%2C478&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-99.png?resize=720%2C478&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286542\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-99.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-99.png?resize=300%2C199&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dr. Spencer\u2019s study addresses the impact of naturally occurring climate behaviors such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation as contributing to changes that affect weather patterns over the Northeast Pacific which ultimately impact the long-term Colorado River snowpack levels of this region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The conclusions form Dr. Spencer\u2019s study are noted as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>\u201cThe popular narrative that drought due to climate change is causing Lake Mead to have less water available to it is incorrect. Since 1930, there has been no long-term change in the Colorado River flow upstream of what is now Lake Mead.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The latest climate models do not even predict a reduction in precipitation in the upper Colorado River watershed<\/strong>. (Dr. Spencer utilizes CMIP6 model predicted average yearly precipitation 1930-2050 over an area approximating the upper Colorado River watershed to establish this finding)&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Multi-decadal changes in river flow do occur, though, and are related to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a natural fluctuation in weather patterns over the northeast Pacific. Recent record-low water levels in Lake Mead are primarily due to record high water demand from the lake, since approximately 2000. The problem is being made somewhat worse by the negative phase of the PDO, also since approximately 2000.\u201d<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Denver Post article\u2019s claim of \u201cclimate change warming\u201d impacts being responsible for the declining water levels of Lake Mead as determined by a \u201ccomputer model simulation\u201d are unsupported and completely contradicted by readily available measures of Upper Colorado River Basis snow levels and USBR water inflow data for the Colorado River flowing into Lake Mead. &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Colorado River Flow Data Disproves \u201cClimate Change Warming\u201d Computer Model Flow Reduction Claims<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>Guest essay by Larry Hamlin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ocregister.com\/2023\/10\/30\/colorado-river-negotiations-2026\/?utm_email=E4DC8441B512758295E9C428EC&amp;active=no&amp;utm_source=listrak&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=https:\/\/www.ocregister.com\/2023\/10\/30\/colorado-river-negotiations-2026\/&amp;utm_campaign=scng-ocr-localist&amp;utm_content=curated\">Orange County Register published a prior Denver Post article<\/a>\u00a0claiming that \u201cclimate change warming\u201d had caused a 20% reduction in Colorado River flow since 1900 as shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"618\" data-attachment-id=\"286543\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=286543\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-100.png?fit=720%2C618&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,618\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-100\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-100.png?fit=720%2C618&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-100.png?resize=720%2C618&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-286543\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-100.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-100.png?resize=300%2C258&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Denver Post article (as published in the Orange County Register) notes:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFirst, the river is drying as the West becomes warmer and more arid. Warmer temperatures speed evaporation, further reducing a lack of water from less precipitation. One&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/news\/colorado-river-flow-dwindles-warming-driven-loss-reflective-snow-energizes-evaporation\"><strong>report<\/strong>&nbsp;by the U.S. Geological Survey<\/a>&nbsp;found the Colorado River\u2019s flows have dropped by 20% since 1900 primarily due to warming.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/news\/colorado-river-flow-dwindles-warming-driven-loss-reflective-snow-energizes-evaporation\">U.S. Geological Survey&nbsp;<strong>report<\/strong>&nbsp;referenced<\/a>&nbsp;in the Denver Post article then references a February 2020&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.usgs.gov\/publication\/70209076\"><strong>study<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>\u201crecently published in Science\u201d<\/strong><\/a><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>which notes:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe sensitivity of river discharge to climate-system warming is highly uncertain, and the processes that govern river discharge are poorly understood, which impedes climate-change adaptation.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA&nbsp;<strong>Monte Carlo simulation<\/strong>&nbsp;with a radiation-aware hydrologic model resolves the longstanding, wide disparity in sensitivity estimates and reveals the controlling physical processes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This&nbsp;<strong>computer model simulation<\/strong>&nbsp;is then used to \u201cestimate\u201d&nbsp;the following outcome for Colorado River flows as:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe estimate that annual mean discharge has been decreasing by 9.3% per degree Celsius of warming because of increased evapotranspiration, mainly driven by snow loss and a consequent decrease in reflection of solar radiation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thus, the claim that \u201cthe Colorado River flows have dropped by 20% since 1900 primarily due to warming\u201d is driven by a \u201ccomputer model simulation\u201d which was intended to reveal the \u201ccontrolling physical processes\u201d regarding Colorado River flows into Lake Mead.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Denver Post article never addresses any measured data regarding Colorado River flows into Lake Mead with this data readily available from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation covering the period from 1930-2019.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Additionally, neither data of the Upper Colorado River Basin Snowpack levels during this same period that feed the Colorado River nor data of the changing supply and demands from the Colorado River water\u2019s many users during this period is addressed in the Denver Post article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The peer review \u201cstudy\u201d published in Science assumes the lower levels of Lake Mead are caused by reduced flows from the Colorado River and then uses a \u201cMonte Carlo simulation\u201d computer model to determine how \u201cclimate change warming\u201d caused this reduced flow of the Colorado that resulted in lower water levels in Lake Mead. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Climate scientist&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.drroyspencer.com\/2022\/08\/lake-mead-low-water-levels-part-2-colorado-river-inflow-variations-and-trend\/\">Dr. Roy Spencer evaluated measurement records of inflows<\/a>&nbsp;of the Colorado River at Lees Ferry starting in the 1930s as well as measurements of snow levels at the upper Colorado basis over this period which is the primary source supplying Colorado River flows arriving at Lees Ferry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dr. Spencer\u2019s study and analysis of measured data regarding the Lake Mead Elevation changes since 1940 and the Colorado inflows since 1930 is shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2023\/11\/02\/colorado-river-flow-data-disproves-climate-change-warming-computer-model-flow-reduction-claims\/\" alt=\"A graph on a white sheet\n\nDescription automatically generated\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Key highlights from the study are noted as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Contrary to claims that drought is causing Lake Mead water levels to fall, the Colorado River natural flows into Lake Mead show no long-term trend since 1930.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Decadal time scale variations in river flow do occur, though, related to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Since about 2000, use of Lake Mead water has exceeded river inflow, causing water levels to drop. The negative phase of the PDO since that time has exacerbated the problem.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Data from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) establish that there has been&nbsp;<strong>no long term-term trend in the natural Colorado River flow into Lake Mead<\/strong>&nbsp;as shown in detail below from Figure 1 of Dr. Spencer\u2019s study.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2023\/11\/02\/colorado-river-flow-data-disproves-climate-change-warming-computer-model-flow-reduction-claims\/\" alt=\"A graph showing water flows into lake mead\n\nDescription automatically generated\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Data from snowmelt in the Upper Colorado River Basin Snowpack that feeds the water entering Lake Mead is shown below in Figure 3 of Dr. Spencer\u2019s study which shows there is&nbsp;<strong>no long-term trend in snowpack measurements in the period 1938-2022<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2023\/11\/02\/colorado-river-flow-data-disproves-climate-change-warming-computer-model-flow-reduction-claims\/\" alt=\"A graph showing the temperature of a river\n\nDescription automatically generated\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dr. Spencer\u2019s study addresses the declining water levels of Lake Mead since about year 2000 by establishing that downstream water user demands have significantly exceeded water input into the lake as shown in Figure 2 below from a Bureau of Reclamation study published in 2012 that identified this excessive Colorado River water demand problem issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2023\/11\/02\/colorado-river-flow-data-disproves-climate-change-warming-computer-model-flow-reduction-claims\/\" alt=\"A graph showing water supply and water supply\n\nDescription automatically generated\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dr. Spencer\u2019s study addresses the impact of naturally occurring climate behaviors such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation as contributing to changes that affect weather patterns over the Northeast Pacific which ultimately impact the long-term Colorado River snowpack levels of this region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The conclusions form Dr. Spencer\u2019s study are noted as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>\u201cThe popular narrative that drought due to climate change is causing Lake Mead to have less water available to it is incorrect. Since 1930, there has been no long-term change in the Colorado River flow upstream of what is now Lake Mead.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The latest climate models do not even predict a reduction in precipitation in the upper Colorado River watershed<\/strong>. (Dr. Spencer utilizes CMIP6 model predicted average yearly precipitation 1930-2050 over an area approximating the upper Colorado River watershed to establish this finding)&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Multi-decadal changes in river flow do occur, though, and are related to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a natural fluctuation in weather patterns over the northeast Pacific. Recent record-low water levels in Lake Mead are primarily due to record high water demand from the lake, since approximately 2000. The problem is being made somewhat worse by the negative phase of the PDO, also since approximately 2000.\u201d<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Denver Post article\u2019s claim of \u201cclimate change warming\u201d impacts being responsible for the declining water levels of Lake Mead as determined by a \u201ccomputer model simulation\u201d are unsupported and completely contradicted by readily available measures of Upper Colorado River Basis snow levels and USBR water inflow data for the Colorado River flowing into Lake Mead. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The next question is, does climate change even predict future reductions of precipitation over the Colorado River watershed? The following plot shows an average of 183 climate model simulations of average yearly precipitation in an area approximating the Colorado River watershed. The models suggest a slight increase in total precipitation with warming. From Watts Up [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":286547,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"The next question is, does climate change even predict future reductions of precipitation over the Colorado River watershed? The following plot shows an average of 183 climate model simulations of average yearly precipitation in an area approximating the ","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691824275,691824274,691824276,691820545,691824277],"class_list":{"0":"post-286535","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change-warming","9":"tag-colorado-river","10":"tag-computer-model-simulation","11":"tag-dr-roy-spencer","12":"tag-term-term-trend","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0horseshoe-bend-iconic_s.jpg?fit=1500%2C1500&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1cxx","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215755,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=215755","url_meta":{"origin":286535,"position":0},"title":"Lake Mead Low Water Levels, Part 2: Colorado River Inflow Variations and Trend","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/26\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The popular narrative that drought due to climate change is causing Lake Mead to have less water available to it is incorrect.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1195.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1195.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1195.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1195.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-1195.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218591,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=218591","url_meta":{"origin":286535,"position":1},"title":"Wrong, CNN, Climate Change Driven Extreme Weather Not Behind Declining River Levels","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/12\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In short, CNN\u2019s story is more an indictment of its own biases concerning the dangers of purported human-caused climate change than it is a report documenting the dangers of climate change itself.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-628.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-628.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-628.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-628.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-628.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241093,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=241093","url_meta":{"origin":286535,"position":2},"title":"The California Drought is Over. Definitively.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/23\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After over a month of torrential rain and massive mountain snow, the drought is over in California.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1001.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1001.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1001.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1001.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-1001.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217076,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=217076","url_meta":{"origin":286535,"position":3},"title":"Is Extreme Weather Causing the World\u2019s Rivers to Dry Up?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/03\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Agriculture too has a high demand for water, and the simple increase in population may tax existing water supplies.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-151.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-151.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-151.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-151.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300896,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=300896","url_meta":{"origin":286535,"position":4},"title":"Climate Change Is Not Behind Lake Mead\u2019s Decline, Overuse and Poor Management Are","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"With an atmospheric river dumping trillions of gallons precipitation on California and other western states, some news outlets have asked how the precipitation might affect Lake Mead, suggesting that the rainfall will do little for the lake or the Colorado River basin which feeds it because it\u2019s drying out due\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Canva-Lake-Mead.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Canva-Lake-Mead.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Canva-Lake-Mead.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Canva-Lake-Mead.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Canva-Lake-Mead.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338539,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=338539","url_meta":{"origin":286535,"position":5},"title":"Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has not been seriously considered.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0e2910b9d-b9b7-4c46-950a-382ac9f8a167_rw_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C939&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0e2910b9d-b9b7-4c46-950a-382ac9f8a167_rw_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C939&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0e2910b9d-b9b7-4c46-950a-382ac9f8a167_rw_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C939&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0e2910b9d-b9b7-4c46-950a-382ac9f8a167_rw_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C939&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0e2910b9d-b9b7-4c46-950a-382ac9f8a167_rw_1920.jpg?fit=1200%2C939&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=286535"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286535\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":286551,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286535\/revisions\/286551"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/286547"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=286535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=286535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=286535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}