{"id":285740,"date":"2023-10-30T11:01:32","date_gmt":"2023-10-30T10:01:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285740"},"modified":"2023-10-30T11:01:36","modified_gmt":"2023-10-30T10:01:36","slug":"pielke-jr-going-all-in-with-peak-fossil-fuels-by-2030","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285740","title":{"rendered":"Pielke Jr.: Going All in with Peak Fossil Fuels by 2030"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More generally, the issuance of a forecast by IEA contradicts everything we have learned about the perils of energy system forecasting. With rare exceptions, medium- and long-range forecasts become largely worthless in a matter of years, and often a few months after their publication.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The International Energy Agency bets its reputation on an aggressive prediction<\/em><\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In a recent substack by Roger Pielke Jr<\/a>., a critical analysis is presented regarding the International Energy Agency\u2019s (IEA) bold prediction concerning the peaking of fossil fuels by 2030. Pielke\u2019s meticulous examination of the IEA\u2019s forecast reveals a landscape where the integrity of scientific prognostication seems to be on a precarious ledge, teetering between objective analysis and the abyss of advocacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe International Energy Agency (IEA), headquartered in Paris and overseen by the OECD, issued a bold prediction in its 2023 World Energy Outlook (emphasis added): The combination of growing momentum behind clean energy technologies and structural economic shifts around the world has major implications for fossil fuels, with peaks in global demand for coal, oil and natural gas all visible this decade \u2013 the first time this has happened in a WEO scenario based on today\u2019s policy settings.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Pielke underscores the significance of the IEA\u2019s position as one of the world\u2019s preeminent institutions providing global energy analyses to decision-makers. The IEA\u2019s forecast, therefore, carries substantial weight in shaping global energy policies and strategies, making its objectivity and analytical rigor of paramount importance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cConflict over the IEA\u2019s latest World Energy Outlook matters because the IEA, created in the 1970s to focus on oil, has evolved to serve as one of the world\u2019s preeminent institutions providing global energy analyses to global decision makers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The article juxtaposes the IEA\u2019s predictions against those of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), revealing stark contrasts in their respective outlooks on the future of fossil fuels. While the IEA foresees a peak in fossil fuel consumption by 2030, the EIA\u2019s projections do not align with this view, showing no such peak in any of the fossil fuels before 2050.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cFirst, in its reference scenario the EIA foresees no peak in any of the fossil fuels before 2050. Coal increases the least, but still by about 5% over 2025. Second, the differences between IEA and EIA are stark, especially so for coal. IEA sees a 40% decline by 2050 and EIA see an increase of about 5%.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Pielke emphasizes the risk that the IEA is taking with its reputation by making such aggressive predictions. He suggests that the IEA\u2019s forecast seems to be more aligned with advocacy than objective analysis, a position that could potentially undermine its credibility and influence in global energy discourse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe IEA has made a significant bet on peak fossil fuels and its reputation hangs in the balance. Here are the implications: If the peak occurs by 2030, the IEA will be celebrated as going out on a limb and being correct, solidifying its position as the preeminent international body for energy system analyses.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion, Pielke\u2019s article invites a discerning evaluation of the IEA\u2019s predictions, encouraging a vigilant appraisal of the objectivity and analytical integrity of influential global energy institutions. It underscores the necessity for these institutions to maintain a steadfast commitment to objective, evidence-based analysis, free from the influences of advocacy and policy predispositions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIn either case, IEA\u2019s issuance of the peak-fossil fuel forecast has created strong incentives for the organization to act as an advocate, because of the two possible outcomes above. Rooting for your own forecast is not a good situation to be in for a science advisory body \u2014 it is also the reason why we think it a bad idea to let referees bet on the games that they are officiating.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

You can read the entire article at Dr. Pielke Jr.\u2019s substack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
IEA WEO 2023<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/rogerpielkejr.substack.com\/p\/going-all-in-with-peak-fossil-fuels?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=119454&post_id=138339679&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1g0x4t&utm_medium=email<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

More generally, the issuance of a forecast by IEA contradicts everything we have learned about the perils of energy system forecasting. With rare exceptions, medium- and long-range forecasts become largely worthless in a matter of years, and often a few months after their publication. From Watts Up With That? The International Energy Agency bets its […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":285746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"More generally, the issuance of a forecast by IEA contradicts everything we have learned about the perils of energy system forecasting. With rare exceptions, medium- and long-range forecasts become largely worthless in a matter of years, and often a few m","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818076,691824105,691818228,691824104],"class_list":{"0":"post-285740","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-co2","9":"tag-energy-system-forecasting","10":"tag-fossil-fuels","11":"tag-international-energy-agencys-iea","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-833.png?fit=1252%2C838&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1ckI","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":418159,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=418159","url_meta":{"origin":285740,"position":0},"title":"Record demand for coal: When the energy transition boomerang","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/22\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"IEA forecasts new all-time high in coal consumption \u2013 wind and hydropower, of all things, are partly to blame","rel":"","context":"In \"China and India\"","block_context":{"text":"China and India","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=china-and-india"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3J7syICTURDr04nuzDp7xaPj6NQqyE9PEq-7WrtKxR7CYW8fOsbYErHlGeXE-9ItKJehYFREheVU1Ug3QN07UhixMlDopKqRS2HoYlK-bAU3mLl_eCuLezUWUk4MR.jpeg?fit=1200%2C662&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3J7syICTURDr04nuzDp7xaPj6NQqyE9PEq-7WrtKxR7CYW8fOsbYErHlGeXE-9ItKJehYFREheVU1Ug3QN07UhixMlDopKqRS2HoYlK-bAU3mLl_eCuLezUWUk4MR.jpeg?fit=1200%2C662&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3J7syICTURDr04nuzDp7xaPj6NQqyE9PEq-7WrtKxR7CYW8fOsbYErHlGeXE-9ItKJehYFREheVU1Ug3QN07UhixMlDopKqRS2HoYlK-bAU3mLl_eCuLezUWUk4MR.jpeg?fit=1200%2C662&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3J7syICTURDr04nuzDp7xaPj6NQqyE9PEq-7WrtKxR7CYW8fOsbYErHlGeXE-9ItKJehYFREheVU1Ug3QN07UhixMlDopKqRS2HoYlK-bAU3mLl_eCuLezUWUk4MR.jpeg?fit=1200%2C662&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3J7syICTURDr04nuzDp7xaPj6NQqyE9PEq-7WrtKxR7CYW8fOsbYErHlGeXE-9ItKJehYFREheVU1Ug3QN07UhixMlDopKqRS2HoYlK-bAU3mLl_eCuLezUWUk4MR.jpeg?fit=1200%2C662&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233774,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=233774","url_meta":{"origin":285740,"position":1},"title":"Will Solar Power Exceed Coal Power in 2027?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/13\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"FAKE NEWS ALERT!!","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0image-55.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0image-55.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0image-55.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0image-55.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234362,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=234362","url_meta":{"origin":285740,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Turbocharged\u2019 Renewables: The IEA Hawking Its Wares Again","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/16\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Let\u2019s look under the hood, shall we?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0HZNHcPyS.png?fit=1036%2C488&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0HZNHcPyS.png?fit=1036%2C488&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0HZNHcPyS.png?fit=1036%2C488&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/0HZNHcPyS.png?fit=1036%2C488&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":404082,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=404082","url_meta":{"origin":285740,"position":3},"title":"The end of fossil fuel era? It\u2019s nowhere near","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/22\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"For the last few years, climate and energy policymakers have convinced themselves the world was inexorably moving away from fossil fuels. Breaking news: it is not.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide emissions\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide emissions","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-emissions"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0fossilfuelsu.jpg?fit=1200%2C781&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0fossilfuelsu.jpg?fit=1200%2C781&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0fossilfuelsu.jpg?fit=1200%2C781&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0fossilfuelsu.jpg?fit=1200%2C781&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0fossilfuelsu.jpg?fit=1200%2C781&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":424371,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=424371","url_meta":{"origin":285740,"position":4},"title":"Expert Study Shows Sanity Returning to Global Oil Forecasts, But Damage Has Been","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"It can be hard to explain to a general audience how important the release of the World Energy Outlook (WEO) is to policymakers, energy companies and investors who make hundreds of billions of dollars in investment decisions worldwide each year.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Policies\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Policies","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-policies"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQM6uASCh6sY3Vl9GzRbxNJlfaVQdKi6F0AOxT5JUJC9Wb9nnTCSXqIU5Nl8EQA54rBFdiIeCYANxSVRWaH9wQTJAraNw8QMEoNs4rvyI7t6Xnx7N5dkEtxdBydYQ7WY.jpeg?fit=1200%2C731&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQM6uASCh6sY3Vl9GzRbxNJlfaVQdKi6F0AOxT5JUJC9Wb9nnTCSXqIU5Nl8EQA54rBFdiIeCYANxSVRWaH9wQTJAraNw8QMEoNs4rvyI7t6Xnx7N5dkEtxdBydYQ7WY.jpeg?fit=1200%2C731&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQM6uASCh6sY3Vl9GzRbxNJlfaVQdKi6F0AOxT5JUJC9Wb9nnTCSXqIU5Nl8EQA54rBFdiIeCYANxSVRWaH9wQTJAraNw8QMEoNs4rvyI7t6Xnx7N5dkEtxdBydYQ7WY.jpeg?fit=1200%2C731&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQM6uASCh6sY3Vl9GzRbxNJlfaVQdKi6F0AOxT5JUJC9Wb9nnTCSXqIU5Nl8EQA54rBFdiIeCYANxSVRWaH9wQTJAraNw8QMEoNs4rvyI7t6Xnx7N5dkEtxdBydYQ7WY.jpeg?fit=1200%2C731&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQM6uASCh6sY3Vl9GzRbxNJlfaVQdKi6F0AOxT5JUJC9Wb9nnTCSXqIU5Nl8EQA54rBFdiIeCYANxSVRWaH9wQTJAraNw8QMEoNs4rvyI7t6Xnx7N5dkEtxdBydYQ7WY.jpeg?fit=1200%2C731&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":391464,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=391464","url_meta":{"origin":285740,"position":5},"title":"Energy Secretary Wright Threatens To Take U.S. Out of International Energy Agency over Climate-Cult Supporting Forecasts","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/29\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Instead of sipping champagne while making up fantasy stories of melting polar ice and dying polar bears, Wright challenges narratives and promotes policies that will not only help our nation, but the rest of the world.","rel":"","context":"In \"Artificial Intelligence (AI)\"","block_context":{"text":"Artificial Intelligence (AI)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=artificial-intelligence-ai"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0AQOA3yQ3pKp9bEEjPOexctLlNK6Z8NaeTM_vVgoYBNH38E3GFiA8obnesXdXu0HY_seH_sUc0teHT9aJSE9FruLENFqvoIl6Nk4V88xCceeU554lMXJR5wvr7mJ2so5bVYLTdV7ksEQDARATCQjuPZ3-u4bynA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0AQOA3yQ3pKp9bEEjPOexctLlNK6Z8NaeTM_vVgoYBNH38E3GFiA8obnesXdXu0HY_seH_sUc0teHT9aJSE9FruLENFqvoIl6Nk4V88xCceeU554lMXJR5wvr7mJ2so5bVYLTdV7ksEQDARATCQjuPZ3-u4bynA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0AQOA3yQ3pKp9bEEjPOexctLlNK6Z8NaeTM_vVgoYBNH38E3GFiA8obnesXdXu0HY_seH_sUc0teHT9aJSE9FruLENFqvoIl6Nk4V88xCceeU554lMXJR5wvr7mJ2so5bVYLTdV7ksEQDARATCQjuPZ3-u4bynA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0AQOA3yQ3pKp9bEEjPOexctLlNK6Z8NaeTM_vVgoYBNH38E3GFiA8obnesXdXu0HY_seH_sUc0teHT9aJSE9FruLENFqvoIl6Nk4V88xCceeU554lMXJR5wvr7mJ2so5bVYLTdV7ksEQDARATCQjuPZ3-u4bynA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0AQOA3yQ3pKp9bEEjPOexctLlNK6Z8NaeTM_vVgoYBNH38E3GFiA8obnesXdXu0HY_seH_sUc0teHT9aJSE9FruLENFqvoIl6Nk4V88xCceeU554lMXJR5wvr7mJ2so5bVYLTdV7ksEQDARATCQjuPZ3-u4bynA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=285740"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285740\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285748,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285740\/revisions\/285748"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/285746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=285740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=285740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=285740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}