{"id":284259,"date":"2023-10-20T21:32:52","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T19:32:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=284259"},"modified":"2023-10-20T21:32:55","modified_gmt":"2023-10-20T19:32:55","slug":"observed-increases-in-north-atlantic-tropical-cyclone-peak-intensification-rates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=284259","title":{"rendered":"Observed increases in North Atlantic tropical cyclone peak intensification rates"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More climate junk science made for climate alarmist and fans of climate propaganda. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This new paper in Nature Scientific Reports claims to identify a trend in hurricane intensification so significant that it\u2019s utterly absurd that hurricane forecasters and modelers wouldn\u2019t have noticed and identified it previously. This triggers an intense bright red bullshit detector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-023-42669-y<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

As others to dig into this study we\u2019ll likely see the flawed reasoning that was applied to tease out its conclusion. It\u2019s outside my wheelhouse to do so. When the smoke clears it will be just one more example of how Nature mag has flushed what little credibility it had down the toilet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Update since I scheduled this article. Ryan Maue has weighed in on X (formerly Twitter).]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Quite the media rollout for new research paper claiming to link climate change with Atlantic hurricane intensification rates.

Unfortunately, the paper does not prove the climate change causation link. Comparing Atlantic storms from two 20-year periods: 1971-1990 vs. 2001-2020\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/omfTRtlZ9c<\/a><\/p>— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) October 19, 2023<\/a><\/blockquote>