{"id":283224,"date":"2023-10-13T21:28:38","date_gmt":"2023-10-13T19:28:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=283224"},"modified":"2023-10-13T21:28:41","modified_gmt":"2023-10-13T19:28:41","slug":"can-extreme-heat-make-parts-of-the-earth-too-hot-for-humans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=283224","title":{"rendered":"Can extreme heat make parts of the Earth too hot for humans?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PNAS\u00a0is another absurdity study.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Andy May<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In another \u201cHow the hell did this paper pass peer-review?\u201d incident we find yet another PNAS<\/em> absurdity by Daniel Vecellio and colleagues (Link<\/a>), that is described by a truly awful summary in Science Daily<\/em> here<\/a>. The paper tells us, correctly, that any wet-bulb temperature above 35\u00b0C is dangerous for humans. This particular temperature is dangerous because that is when our bodies lose their ability to cool themselves. The wet bulb temperature is the lowest temperature that air can be cooled to by the evaporation of water. Consider it our external body temperature, in direct sunlight, while sweating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The table in figure 1 shows how this temperature relates to relative humidity and air temperature in the shade. Danger is reached around 36\u00b0C (97\u00b0F) at 55% relative humidity. Fortunately, while this situation can occur, it will not occur for long or over a wide area because deep convection will start spontaneously. Deep convection is a steep updraft, caused by warm, humid air (humid air has a lower density than dry air), rising rapidly and forming clouds. This process is nearly perpetual in the ITCZ or the intertropical convergence zone, which is where the Sun is directly overhead at noon, or the climatic equator. This zone encircles the Earth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 1. A chart showing wet bulb temperatures, as a function of relative humidity (vertical axis) and air temperature in the shade, horizontal.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The values in black are dangerous for work or play outside in direct sunlight. For those who prefer Fahrenheit temperatures, 35\u00b0C is about 95\u00b0F, 37\u00b0C is about 98.6\u00b0F, and 32\u00b0C is about 90\u00b0F. For some perspective, I regularly play golf, in the summer, when the wet bulb temperature is 32\u00b0C. When I was younger, I even walked the golf course at those temperatures. Now I use an electric cart and have immediate access to shade. A little wind while driving the cart really helps. I should also note that, while I\u2019m relatively healthy, I am 71 years old. Thus, Vecellio, et al.\u2019s claim that a more realistic upper threshold is 30.6\u00b0C for \u201cyoung, healthy subjects\u201d is belied on every Houston area golf course (we have more than 80) every July and August.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As both articles note, time of exposure to high wet bulb temperatures is important, but clearly a four-hour golf game is OK, with lots of water and frequent breaks in the shade with a light breeze. The Science Daily<\/em> article quotes the lead author of the paper (Vecellio) as saying: \u201cHeat is already the weather phenomenon that kills the most people in the United States.\u201d This is clearly not true, cold-related deaths far exceed heat-related deaths<\/a> in the U.S. This CDC study<\/a> confirms it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So much for the awful Science Daily<\/em> article, we return to the peer reviewed PNAS<\/em> paper. The first problem we notice is that the authors conflate local warming, mainly in the tropics, with the consensus goal to limit global<\/em> warming to 1.5-2\u00b0C. Tropical temperatures don\u2019t change much even over very long geological periods of time, because they are limited by deep convection to less than 30\u00b0C, except for short periods and over land where humidity is generally lower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is explained well by Sud, et al. (Sud, Walker, & Lau, 1999), Newell and Dopplick (Newell & Dopplick, 1979), Willis Eschenbach (Eschenbach, 2021), and Rick Willoughby (Willoughby, 2021). As Sud, et al. explain, a sea surface temperature of about 28\u00b0C is sufficient to drive the surface air to cloud level. This process also occurs over land, but generally requires high relative humidity and higher temperatures. It is well known that average tropical sea surface temperatures over large areas are capped at 30\u00b0C (86\u00b0F) and that essentially all global warming happens in the higher latitudes, thus the idea in the paper that global warming somehow will push tropical temperatures to dangerous levels is unfounded and physically impossible as long as our oceans and lakes exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our distant ancestors, the first primates, evolved about 56 million years ago during one of the warmest times in the Cenozoic Era. This was the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM<\/a>), when the global average temperature may have been ten degrees warmer than today. Primates not only evolved then, but they also thrived. They spread rapidly around the world according to the fossil record, that we exist today is a testament to their success. Mammal fossils, perhaps even primate fossils, can be found in the Polecat Bench<\/a> section in Wyoming and in PETM sections in Europe. Clearly, during the PETM, the tropical temperatures could not have been much different than today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To find another easily falsifiable PNAS<\/em> paper, so soon after the Leah Stokes\u2019 paper<\/a> shows something is clearly wrong at PNAS<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The featured image is a photo of the PETM section in Polecat, Wyoming. It was taken by Mark Fisher.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Works Cited<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Eschenbach, W. (2021, January 21). A Chain of Effects<\/em>. Retrieved from Wattsupwiththat.com: https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2021\/01\/21\/a-chain-of-effects\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Newell, R., & Dopplick, T. (1979). Questions Concerning the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic CO2 on Atmospheric Temperature. J. Applied Meterology, 18<\/em>, 822-825. doi:10.1175\/1520-0450(1979)018<0822:QCTPIO>2.0.CO;2<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sud, Y. C., Walker, G. K., & Lau, K. M. (1999). Mechanisms Regulating Sea-Surface Temperatures and Deep Convection in the Tropics. Geophysical Research Letters, 26<\/em>(8). Retrieved from https:\/\/agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1029\/1999GL900197<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Willoughby, R. (2021, May 23).\u00a0Ocean Surface Temperature Limit-Part 1<\/em>. Retrieved from Wattsupwiththat: https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2021\/05\/23\/ocean-surface-temperature-limit-part-1\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PNAS\u00a0is another absurdity study. From Watts Up With That? By Andy May In another \u201cHow the hell did this paper pass peer-review?\u201d incident we find yet another PNAS absurdity by Daniel Vecellio and colleagues (Link), that is described by a truly awful summary in Science Daily here. The paper tells us, correctly, that any wet-bulb temperature above 35\u00b0C is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":283230,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"PNAS\u00a0is another absurdity study.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691823005,691818056,691822878,691820674,691818087,691823607],"class_list":{"0":"post-283224","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-atmospheric-temperature","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-earth","11":"tag-extreme-heat","12":"tag-global-warming","13":"tag-pnas-paper","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00AdobeStock_201629014-1538x1024-1.jpeg?fit=1538%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1bG8","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300680,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=300680","url_meta":{"origin":283224,"position":0},"title":"Hurricane Category 6?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The\u00a0PNAS\u00a0reasoning was that a few Pacific Hurricanes (aka tropical cyclones) have exceeded SF level 5. True, sort of. All 5 cited by PNAS only temporarily exceeded Cat 5. For example, quoting from the new paper, \u201cThe most intense of these hypothetical Cat 6 storms, Patricia, hit landfall in Jalisco, Mexico\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0hurricane-patricia.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0hurricane-patricia.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0hurricane-patricia.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0hurricane-patricia.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0hurricane-patricia.jpg?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441820,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=441820","url_meta":{"origin":283224,"position":1},"title":"Snowball Earth May Hide a Far Stranger Climate Cycle Than Anyone Expected","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/29\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in 2026 proposes that the famous \"Snowball Earth\" events\u2014particularly the long Sturtian glaciation (~717\u2013658 million years ago)\u2014may have involved a far stranger, oscillating climate cycle than the traditional \"one long freeze followed by rapid thaw\" model.","rel":"","context":"In \"Cryogenian Period (part of the Neoproterozoic)\"","block_context":{"text":"Cryogenian Period (part of the Neoproterozoic)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cryogenian-period-part-of-the-neoproterozoic"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Snowball-Earth-May-Hide-a-Far-Stranger-Climate-Cycle-Than-Anyone-Expected.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Snowball-Earth-May-Hide-a-Far-Stranger-Climate-Cycle-Than-Anyone-Expected.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Snowball-Earth-May-Hide-a-Far-Stranger-Climate-Cycle-Than-Anyone-Expected.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Snowball-Earth-May-Hide-a-Far-Stranger-Climate-Cycle-Than-Anyone-Expected.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330571,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330571","url_meta":{"origin":283224,"position":2},"title":"The Ideological Capture of Academia: Scientific Censorship Motivated by Prosocial Concerns","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/30\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"An article published last November from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) titled \u201cProsocial Motives Underlie Scientific Censorship by Scientists: A Perspective and Research Agenda\u201d exposes a profound issue within the scientific community\u2014censorship driven by ideological motives under the guise of prosocial concerns. This phenomenon has far-reaching\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Censorship\"","block_context":{"text":"Censorship","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=censorship"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339568,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339568","url_meta":{"origin":283224,"position":3},"title":"Roger Pielke Jr. details \u2018The Top Five Climate Science Scandals\u2019: Study claiming no \u2018climate crisis\u2019 retracted \u2018for not for being wrong\u2026but instead for expressing views that are politically unhelpful\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/14\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The science community has shown a willingness to retract a climate science paper \u2014 in this case not for being wrong in any substantive way, but instead for expressing views that are politically unhelpful. In 2022, a group of Italian scientists published a paper that summarized the IPCC\u2019s conclusions on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-14-152601.png?fit=1200%2C699&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282890,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282890","url_meta":{"origin":283224,"position":4},"title":"Leah Stokes, PNAS, and Conflicts of Interest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Leah Stokes blames White people for opposing wind projects. From Watts Up With That? By Andy May Leah Stokes is the senior author of a new paper in\u00a0PNAS,\u00a0Prevalence and predictors of wind energy opposition in North America, in which she blames White people for opposing wind projects. She goes on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0leah-stokes.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0leah-stokes.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0leah-stokes.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0leah-stokes.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0leah-stokes.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426994,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426994","url_meta":{"origin":283224,"position":5},"title":"The University of East Anglia Discovers the Urban Heat Island Effect","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/19\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The UHI phenomenon- where cities are warmer than surrounding rural areas due to human activities, buildings, paved surfaces absorbing heat, reduced vegetation, and waste heat- was first systematically observed and described in the early 19th century by Luke Howard in his studies of London's temperatures (around 1810\u20131830). He documented higher\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0glo-urban-heat-island-effect.webp?fit=1200%2C690&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=283224"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":283232,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283224\/revisions\/283232"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/283230"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=283224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=283224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=283224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}