{"id":282857,"date":"2023-10-11T15:02:58","date_gmt":"2023-10-11T13:02:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282857"},"modified":"2023-10-11T15:03:00","modified_gmt":"2023-10-11T13:03:00","slug":"mann-tweets-study-claiming-climate-deniers-are-misogynist-authoritarians","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282857","title":{"rendered":"Mann Tweets Study Claiming Climate Deniers Are Misogynist Authoritarians"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Michael Mann introduce new absurd pseudo- studies.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

h\/t Dr. Willie Soon; Mann beclowning himself promoting absurd studies \u2013 but I guess that is nothing new.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The study abstract;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Misogyny, authoritarianism, and climate change<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nitasha Kaul<\/a>, Tom Buchanan<\/a>
First published: 18 May 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Globally, democratic politics are under attack from Electorally Legitimated Misogynist Authoritarian (ELMA) leaders<\/strong> who successfully use misogyny as a political strategy and present environmental concern in feminine and inferior terms. The ascendancy of such projects raise questions involving socioeconomic structures, political communication, and the psychological underpinnings of people\u2019s attitudes. We offer misogyny, conceptualized in a specific way \u2013 not simply as hatred or disgust for women, but as a way of accessing a gendered hierarchy whereby that which is labeled \u201cfeminine\u201d is perceived as inferior, devalued, and amenable to be attacked \u2013 as a relevant transmission mechanism in how ELMAs like Trump may connect with public opinion by systematically investigating the interplay between misogyny, authoritarianism, and climate change in the context of the United States.<\/strong> Using a survey methodology (N<\/em> = 314) and up-to-date questionnaires, we provide a concrete empirical underpinning for recent analytical and theoretical work on the complexity of misogyny. We analyze how misogynist and authoritarian attitudes correlate with climate change, adding to the literature on opposition to climate change policy. An additional exploratory aspect of our study concerning US voter preferences clearly indicates that Trump supporters are more misogynist, more authoritarian, and less concerned with the environment.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

And so, it is 100% clear that there is this toxic package or bundle of right-wing ideology, nationalism, exceptionalism, racism, sexism, anti-immigrantism, and anti-climate-change that goes with it. That is what drives many of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Katharine Hayhoe, interviewed by Bjork-James & Barla, 2021<\/a>, p. 389]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

Gender is a game-changer, like the Archimedean fulcrum, with the potential to shift economic logics from profit-exploiting systems of injustice to functional praxes of life-affirming care for ecosystems, human others, and planetary co-habitants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Glazebrook, 2015<\/a>, p. 126]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

Sustainability is considered to be a \u2018feminine\u2019 project.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

Climate change is a man-made problem and must have a feminist solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Mary Robinson, in Allen et al., 2019<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Read more: https:\/\/spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/asap.12347<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The study authors have a problem with climate skeptics \u201ctargeting\u201d female leaders like AOC and Greta, arguing the motivation is misogyny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u2026 The most upfront manifestation of this is the ways in which outspoken female advocates of addressing climate change in substantive ways are targeted. Gelin (2019<\/a>) referred to the \u201cgender reactionaries to climate-denialism\u201d with reference to the attack on figures such as Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Greta Thunberg.  \u2026Read more: same link as above<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The study is based on a sample of 400 people, whom after deleting a bunch of answers was whittled down to 314. They claim most of the discarded answers had zero variation on answers \u2013 but given the in my opinion poor quality questions, the lack of variation could have been an artefact of the survey rather than a conspiracy to rig the result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study authors draw inferences based on their misogyny theory, like blaming Hillary Clinton\u2019s loss in 2016 on sexism amplified by climate denial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors redefine \u201cmisogyny\u201d as being something other than hatred and \/ or disdain for women \u2013 crypto misogyny? \u2013 which makes you wonder why they tried to shoehorn everything into the label \u201cmisogyny\u201d, instead of using a different word. \u201c\u2026 We depart from the typical understanding of misogyny as hatred and disgust toward women by men, it is far from straightforward in how it functions as part of psycho-political processes. \u2026<\/em>\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My favourite paragraph though is this one;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u2026 In a similar vein, Stanley et al. (2019<\/a>), in their 5-year cross-lagged analysis of the influence of SDO and RWA on environmentalism conclude that, \u201cthe relationship between ideology and environmentalism across time could be explained by a third variable.<\/strong> Specifically, it is possible that something related both to ideological and environmental attitudes could drive changes in each variable independently, hence explaining the apparent causal relations\u201d (p. 7). They invite future research to explore the potentially causal nature of the ideology-environmentalism association. We surmise that misogyny could be that third variable.<\/strong> \u2026Read more: same link as above<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

If there is such a hidden third variable, why do the authors automatically assume the hidden variable is affecting the judgement of climate skeptics? Why are they so sure they are the objective party?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because there is a much more obvious candidate for a hidden variable which biases belief in climate change: enthusiastic political support for socialism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is it a coincidence that most climate activists (though not all) also seem to have very left wing political views?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is climate activism be so attractive to socialists?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A fervent communist who used to be a friend once explained to me it doesn\u2019t matter if climate science is wrong, because restraining capitalism with more regulation is socially desirable, even if the climate science rationale for advancing green restraints on capitalism turns out to be wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I don\u2019t think my former friend was deliberately lying about his climate beliefs, but in my opinion my former friend pretty much admitted he had no incentive to rigorously review the supporting evidence for his climate alarmism.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Left wing biases clouding the judgement of climate alarmists might also explain why most greens reject nuclear energy.<\/strong> Nuclear energy should be the obvious zero carbon compromise \u2013 a scalable zero carbon energy solution which the Right would accept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We have unequivocal proof nuclear is affordable and safe, once you cut the red tape \u2013 France decarbonised most of their electricity generation with affordable nuclear power in the 1970s<\/a>. Yet greens consistently choose endless political conflict instead of accepting a viable nuclear powered path to reducing CO2 emissions. They choose endless energy stalemate instead of embracing a solution to their alleged climate crisis which would leave Capitalism intact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Michael Mann introduce new absurd pseudo- studies. From Watts Up With That? h\/t Dr. Willie Soon; Mann beclowning himself promoting absurd studies \u2013 but I guess that is nothing new. The study abstract; The study authors have a problem with climate skeptics \u201ctargeting\u201d female leaders like AOC and Greta, arguing the motivation is misogyny. \u2026 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":282862,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Michael Mann introduce new absurd pseudo- studies.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691823519,691819255,691818056,691818920,691818215,691823518,691823520],"class_list":{"0":"post-282857","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-authoritarianism","9":"tag-climate-activism","10":"tag-climate-change","11":"tag-climate-deniers","12":"tag-michael-mann","13":"tag-misogyny","14":"tag-socialists","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-11-144903.png?fit=1106%2C555&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1bAd","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":396983,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=396983","url_meta":{"origin":282857,"position":0},"title":"Angry Michael Mann Isolates Himself (climate exaggeration backfires)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Michael \u201cClimategate\u201d Mann cannot get out of his own way. His arrogant, condescending social tweets speak for themselves\u2013just as the words, sentences, and paragraphs of the\u00a0East Anglia emails did. He is not the kind of person you would want in just about any endeavor, much less as a climate scientist\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQNlxnfLotJgB3VjpYoy7y7UwG7K4xVIETU9iqVu-cvBi8YsTTi_c1qGPGses-jod4ONEkNLrdTdWakYLLlL93RjVrgkRe_WCUsIHnywdcGKrwgIVf72NxTqIeHHmGAZsOyh67ft5wJvKfT7bx8EbfZYaWaiSA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQNlxnfLotJgB3VjpYoy7y7UwG7K4xVIETU9iqVu-cvBi8YsTTi_c1qGPGses-jod4ONEkNLrdTdWakYLLlL93RjVrgkRe_WCUsIHnywdcGKrwgIVf72NxTqIeHHmGAZsOyh67ft5wJvKfT7bx8EbfZYaWaiSA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQNlxnfLotJgB3VjpYoy7y7UwG7K4xVIETU9iqVu-cvBi8YsTTi_c1qGPGses-jod4ONEkNLrdTdWakYLLlL93RjVrgkRe_WCUsIHnywdcGKrwgIVf72NxTqIeHHmGAZsOyh67ft5wJvKfT7bx8EbfZYaWaiSA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQNlxnfLotJgB3VjpYoy7y7UwG7K4xVIETU9iqVu-cvBi8YsTTi_c1qGPGses-jod4ONEkNLrdTdWakYLLlL93RjVrgkRe_WCUsIHnywdcGKrwgIVf72NxTqIeHHmGAZsOyh67ft5wJvKfT7bx8EbfZYaWaiSA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQNlxnfLotJgB3VjpYoy7y7UwG7K4xVIETU9iqVu-cvBi8YsTTi_c1qGPGses-jod4ONEkNLrdTdWakYLLlL93RjVrgkRe_WCUsIHnywdcGKrwgIVf72NxTqIeHHmGAZsOyh67ft5wJvKfT7bx8EbfZYaWaiSA-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307361,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=307361","url_meta":{"origin":282857,"position":1},"title":"ONE MILLION DOLLARS, (or maybe not) Steyn Files Appeal","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/03\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Mark Steyn has begun the process of appealing the Mann v Steyn verdict. From SteynOnline ~Following\u00a0last month\u2019s verdict,\u00a0Mann vs Simberg and Steyn\u00a0moves on into its thirteenth year and the appellate phase \u2026oh, no, sorry, we\u2019ve still got some post-verdict maneuvring to attend to. On Friday, my counsel filed three motions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/01_7hYOker0sxOcK2yLL6T0oQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/01_7hYOker0sxOcK2yLL6T0oQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/01_7hYOker0sxOcK2yLL6T0oQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/01_7hYOker0sxOcK2yLL6T0oQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/01_7hYOker0sxOcK2yLL6T0oQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300864,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=300864","url_meta":{"origin":282857,"position":2},"title":"JC\u2019s ethics complaint against Michael Mann","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"BREAKING.\u00a0 The verdict is in \u2013 GUILTY.\u00a0\u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"Judith Curry\"","block_context":{"text":"Judith Curry","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=judith-curry"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00Screenshot-2024-02-09-151534.png?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00Screenshot-2024-02-09-151534.png?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00Screenshot-2024-02-09-151534.png?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00Screenshot-2024-02-09-151534.png?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00Screenshot-2024-02-09-151534.png?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300918,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=300918","url_meta":{"origin":282857,"position":3},"title":"Mann vs. Steyn: A Disgrace to the Profession \u2013 Climate Change Roundtable #97","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On episode 97 of Climate Change Roundtable, The Heartland Institute\u2019s Anthony Watts, H. Sterling Burnett, Linnea Lueken, and Jim Lakely break down what happened in the trial, how this criminally unjust jury decision came to be, and what this means for the First Amendment rights of anyone who questions alarmist\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Screenshot-2024-02-10-132559.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Screenshot-2024-02-10-132559.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Screenshot-2024-02-10-132559.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Screenshot-2024-02-10-132559.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0Screenshot-2024-02-10-132559.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289845,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=289845","url_meta":{"origin":282857,"position":4},"title":"Mann: \u201cclimate deniers are endanging you, your children, and your grandchildren\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Watts Up With That? h\/t Dr. Willie Soon; So what should be done about these dangerous deniers? Mann tells his audience climate change deniers are endangering your children, but mostly avoids urging specific action. If a \u201cdenier\u201d gets murdered by a climate nut who thinks his act of violence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"China\"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=china"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00a7e1dea76e57db5a6265eab57dc417cf.jpg?fit=1200%2C1050&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00a7e1dea76e57db5a6265eab57dc417cf.jpg?fit=1200%2C1050&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00a7e1dea76e57db5a6265eab57dc417cf.jpg?fit=1200%2C1050&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00a7e1dea76e57db5a6265eab57dc417cf.jpg?fit=1200%2C1050&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00a7e1dea76e57db5a6265eab57dc417cf.jpg?fit=1200%2C1050&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":398666,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=398666","url_meta":{"origin":282857,"position":5},"title":"National Academy of Sciences Goes to War Over CO\u2082","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The climate establishment is in full panic mode as the EPA moves to rescind its bogus 2009 \u201cendangerment\u201d finding on CO\u2082. The National Academy of Sciences is rushing activist scientists like Michael Mann to the barricades, and the attacks are getting nasty.","rel":"","context":"In \"2009 \u201cendangerment\u201d finding\"","block_context":{"text":"2009 \u201cendangerment\u201d finding","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2009-endangerment-finding-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=282857"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282857\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282864,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282857\/revisions\/282864"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/282862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=282857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=282857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=282857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}