{"id":282339,"date":"2023-10-07T15:20:15","date_gmt":"2023-10-07T13:20:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282339"},"modified":"2023-10-07T15:20:18","modified_gmt":"2023-10-07T13:20:18","slug":"they-work-for-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282339","title":{"rendered":"They Work For\u00a0You\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

BY\u00a0MARK HODGSON<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026but also for others<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I don\u2019t think being an MP is an easy job. Sitting on committees, attending debates in the House of Commons, scrutinising legislation, attending functions in your constituency, holding surgeries and assisting constituents with their problems \u2013 all are time-consuming and potentially demanding. To be a dedicated MP, even with the help now available in the form of taxpayer-funded assistants, requires a lot of stamina. That is why I have no problem with MPs receiving a decent salary. I don\u2019t want the House of Commons to be full of under-performing MPs who aren\u2019t up to the job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, do all MPs work as hard as they should? Are they all as effective as they might be? I make no comment on that and leave you to judge. One tool to assist in making that assessment is a website<\/a> called \u201cThey Work For You\u201d. This provides a substantial amount of information regarding the activities, expenses, and declared interests of all MPs and Lords at Westminster, and also some more limited information relating to members of the Holyrood Parliament in Scotland, the Senedd in Wales, and the Northern Ireland Assembly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My personal view is that now that MPs (at last) receive a reasonable salary (\u00a386,584 p.a. as of April 2023), plus generous expenses, with a decent pension scheme and \u201credundancy\u201d payments<\/a> (even if they step down voluntarily), it\u2019s not unreasonable to expect them to devote their whole time and attention to working as an MP. I don\u2019t regard it as appropriate for them to have other jobs. Full disclosure and transparency, via the Register of Members\u2019 Interests, enable us to see what other work they have, which is better than nothing, but in my opinion, they shouldn\u2019t have other work. With the best will in the world, having other jobs at the same time constitutes a distraction from the main job, and always runs the risk (however hard MPs try to counter the tendency) of the MP confusing his other employer\u2019s interests with aspects of his or her own work in Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Campaigning newspapers such as the Guardian very properly draw attention to donations to the Conservative Party, and the benefits they perceive these produce for the donors. For instance, in this article<\/a> the Guardian claims:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Housebuilders and property developers have benefited by billions of pounds from delays to low-carbon building regulations in the past eight years of Tory rule, while the sector became one of the biggest sources of donations to the Conservative party.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If there is a link (whether direct or indirect) between those two things, then that is simply wrong. The Guardian (and others) also, with equal propriety, draw attention to MPs\u2019 interests of which they disapprove (such as connections to the fossil fuel industry). Let\u2019s take a look at some of the things that perhaps aren\u2019t talked about so much.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sir Alok Sharma MP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In February 2022 (quote courtesy of the Guardian<\/a>) Sir Alok Sharma said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The changes in the climate we are seeing today are affecting us much sooner and are greater than we originally thought. The impacts on our daily lives will be increasingly severe and stark\u2026Countries need to take action now. If we don\u2019t take action now, the costs will be much higher, and the impacts higher, in future years.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s well-known that as President of COP 26, Sir Alok had a jet-setting time of it. Even the Guardian, which generally approves of his stance in opposing any watering-down of net zero etc., took a pop at him<\/a>, both for his air miles, and for allegedly failing to self-isolate (this was during the dark days of peak covid) on his return from countries listed at the time by the UK government as \u201cred-list\u201d countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most of Sharma\u2019s trips were during the winter and spring months when international travel from the UK was mostly banned.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

He visited India, Costa Rica, Qatar and UAE in March, while in April he travelled to South Korea and Japan before going to Bangladesh in June.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not all of the 30 known trips were return flights to the UK, but travel to and from all the destinations would total 200,000 miles, or the equivalent to eight times around the Earth\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026A No 10 spokesperson said: \u201cAs Cop president, Alok Sharma is leading climate negotiations with countries including major emitters to cut emissions and secure ambitious action ahead of the Cop26 summit.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe majority of this work is done remotely but some travel to key countries for face-to-face talks is essential. He has secured ambitious action as a result of the discussions he has had.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The spokesperson added: \u201cMinisters conducting essential travel such as this are exempted from quarantine, as set out in the rules.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carbon off-setting (presumably also at the UK taxpayers\u2019 expense) was used as justification for his flights. Just how ambitious was the action he secured can be contemplated here<\/a>. Of course, Sir Alok broke no rules, and everything was above board. It\u2019s just that the rules that applied to his travel were different from the rules that applied to you and me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He didn\u2019t just indulge in long-haul flights in his capacity as COP26 President, however. As can be ascertained from the entries he has made in the Register of Interests<\/a> he flew to New Delhi in March 2023, to attend and speak at the Trilateral Commission Plenary Meeting. The Trilateral Commission<\/a> paid for (I assume) two nights\u2019 accommodation to a value of \u00a3381. At least Sir Alok killed two birds with one stone as he stayed on for two days more to attend and speak at the SEB Nordic CEO Conference. The Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB very decently covered the cost of his flights (\u00a37,271), accommodation (\u00a3536), meals (\u00a3660), and taxi transfers (\u00a3163). That sounds to me (though how would I know? I can\u2019t afford this jet-setting lifestyle) like business class (or even first class) flights. Not for the President of COP 26 the self-denying ordinance that is urged on the rest of us. Why travel economy class to India to reduce your carbon footprint by anywhere between 60 and 80% (depending on which website you visit) when a nice Scandinavian Bank is picking up the tab? It\u2019s more than a little ironic that the Scandinavian bank<\/a> in question apparently has a net zero commitment<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the following month, Sir Alok was off again, this time to New York, where he attended and spoke at the Global Citizen NOW conference (according to the website<\/a> the Friday morning session included a conversation with Ali Velshi, Alok Sharma, Elizabeth Wathuti, and Catherine McKenna about getting to net zero). Fortunately, Global Citizen picked up the tab (\u00a39,744 for flights \u2013 presumably business or first class again; \u00a3881 for taxi transfers; and \u00a3237 for meals). I wonder if the conversation about getting to net zero included a chat about air travel?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A couple of months ago he was off to Australia, this time with a staff member, to attend and speak at the Coalition for Conservation International Climate Conference. Happily the costs were again met by someone else \u2013 this time the Coalition for Conservation<\/a> (\u201cOur goal is to develop effective solutions to reduce emissions and protect the environment<\/em>\u201d \u2013 of course it is: that\u2019s why you fly foreign politicians business class or first class half-way round the planet and back to attend a talking shop). <\/em>I suppose the bill was a snip this time, since it covered the costs of two people \u2013 \u00a39,374 for flights; \u00a32,252 for accommodation; and \u00a3456 for meals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That month saw some more globe-trotting \u2013 this time back to the Big Apple (\u201cIn connection with my role as Rockefeller Foundation Climate and Finance Fellow meetings with representatives of: governments, business and multilateral organisations<\/em>\u201d). Of course, the Rockefeller Foundation<\/a> (\u201cWe\u2019re a philanthropic foundation that promotes the well-being of humanity by finding and scaling solutions to advance opportunity and reverse the climate crisis<\/em>\u201d \u2013 but they haven\u2019t yet discovered things like Skype, Zoom and Microsoft Teams) was paying for what looks like yet another business class or first class flight \u2013 \u00a38,686 for transport; \u00a3565 for accommodation; and \u00a3152 for meals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Rockefeller Foundation also facilitated a trip last month to Nairobi for meetings ahead of the Africa Climate Summit. Naturally, it looks as though the flight was first class or business class, since the declared cost of the flights, visa and taxis was \u00a39,522. Accommodation and meals were a trifling \u00a3214, but then the trip was a brief one \u2013 2nd<\/sup> -3rd<\/sup> September.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Flying here, there and everywhere \u2013 and the associated entries in the Register of Interests \u2013 isn\u2019t the end of it. On 18th<\/sup> May, Sir Alok received \u00a320,000 from J.P. Morgan Securities plc for a speaking engagement. Happily they also provided transport and accommodation, so that the \u00a35,000 per hour payment (the engagement lasted four hours, we are told) wasn\u2019t reduced by costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another speaking engagement in July was even more profitable. Neue Zuercher Zeitung AG coughed up \u00a329,993 in return for four hours of Sir Alok\u2019s time. Thankfully, they too provided the transport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris Skidmore MP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In May 2019, when he was Energy and Clean Growth Minister, Chris Skidmore wrote<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I admire people\u2019s passion in wanting to halt the catastrophic impacts of climate change. All parts of society will feel its lasting effects, and tackling it is rightly a top priority for all generations.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A look at Mr Skidmore\u2019s registered interests<\/a> shows much less in the way of a jet-setting lifestyle paid for by third parties, with the focus being more on the money he makes from working for others. One of the more interesting declarations he made in the Register is this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From 3 January 2023 until further notice, Adviser to the Emissions Capture Company (industrial decarbonisation and clean technology), 8-10 Hill Street, London W1J 5NG. I receive \u00a380,000 per annum, paid monthly, for providing advice on the global energy transition and decarbonisation. Hours: 160-192 hrs per annum. (Registered 07 February 2023)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nice work if you can get it. That\u2019s just \u00a36,584 p.a. less than an MP\u2019s salary. According to the Office for National Statistics<\/a> average weekly total pay in the UK in July 2023 was \u00a3664. If we assume an average 35 hours worked per week, that equates to an average hourly pay rate of \u00a318.97. Mr Skidmore will receive from The Emissions Capture Company hourly pay of \u00a3416.67 \u2013 \u00a3500, depending on whether he provides 160 or 192 hours of \u201cadvice on the global energy transition and decarbonisation<\/em>\u201d. Still, as The Emissions Capture Company\u2019s website<\/a> says, its \u201cteam members have implemented >$70B in major environmental and infrastructure projects globally.<\/em>\u201d Big Green makes lots of money out of this stuff, so what\u2019s \u00a380,000 for a bit of advice?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mr Skidmore is also a Non-Executive director of Oxford Educational Group<\/a>. In return for 6-8 hours of his time every month, they will pay him \u00a340,000 p.a. That\u2019s a similar hourly rate of pay to his earnings from The Emissions Capture Company (\u00a3416.67 to \u00a3555.55 per hour, depending on whether his involvement is at the lower or upper end of those monthly time commitments). Oxford Educational Group is involved, inter alia, in educating non-UK students in the UK, as is clear from the fact that they offer \u201cpre-sessional\u201d English courses. Or as they put it:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We are a unique accredited education provider dedicated to creating life-enhancing experiences for students worldwide. Our extensive portfolio covers university pathway programmes, a comprehensive range of online academic and vocations courses through the OI Digital Institute and English language schools for adult and junior students in the UK, Canada and USA.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

All that seems to involve rather a lot of air miles. Indeed, Mr Skidmore in the Register of Interests, describes his involvement between May 2021 and May 2022 as being the \u201cproviding [of] advice on higher education and international student recruitment<\/em>\u201d. It\u2019s so<\/strong> reassuring, therefore, to find out that they have a robust environmental policy<\/a>, which includes, rather hilariously in the circumstances, \u201c[r]educing carbon emissions through the efficient use of energy and reducing international air travel<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That\u2019s not the end of Mr Skidmore\u2019s extra-curricular activities. From August to December 2022 he received more than \u00a33,000 per month from Public Policy Projects Limited<\/a> , which he describes as an independent public policy institute (they describe themselves as \u201can organisation operating at the heart of health and life sciences policy delivery<\/em>\u201d who \u201cfacilitate effective collaboration between public and private sector organisations<\/em>\u201d and \u201chelp businesses to grow their profile within the NHS and wider public sector<\/em>\u201d). Mr Skidmore describes his involvement with this organisation as \u201cresearch work as senior research adviser<\/em>\u201d. My own view is that the amount of time he devoted, however good his intentions, to this organisation, might have reduced his effectiveness as an MP \u2013 142 hours over 5 months. In August his hourly pay from them was \u00a380.17; in September it was \u00a3106.90; in October it was \u00a3134.87; in November it was \u00a3137.80; and in December it was \u00a3137.15. Compared to some of the pay rates MPs seem to achieve from their non-Parliamentary activities, this is small beer, I suppose, but it\u2019s still pay at a rate between 4 and 6 times the national average, in addition to his MP\u2019s salary and other emoluments. Of interest, perhaps, is that the Chair of Public Policy Projects Limited is Stephen Dorrell<\/a>, who was Secretary of State for Health from 1995 to 1997, and who is also a Board Member of LaingBuisson, the healthcare market intelligence company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mr Skidmore also receives \u00a380,000 p.a. from Global Insight Exchange, which he describes, while registering this interest, as an independent policy institute. The payment is in return for \u201c[c]hairing events and policy research, writing policy reports<\/em>\u201d. A little digging into the paperwork it has filed at Companies House<\/a> suggests that this is another organisation linked to to Stephen Dorrell, <\/em>who in May 2021 was listed as holding directly or indirectly, 75% or more of the shares and voting rights in the company, a state of affairs which ceased to be the case at the end of last year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In November 2022 Mr Skidmore received \u00a36,023.30 from King\u2019s College London, for chairing a panel reviewing research methods and its report between May 2021 and August 2022. This took 24 hours of his time, so the hourly pay rate was a healthier \u00a3250.97.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coincidentally or not, a couple of months later, King\u2019s College, London hosted<\/a> at its Strand campus the launch of Mission Zero, which was described as an \u201cindependent review\u201d of the Net Zero agenda for the UK Government:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The President & Principal of King\u2019s, Professor Shitij Kapur, opened the launch event with a speech welcoming the report and highlighting some of the sector-leading sustainability work taking place at King\u2019s, which is central to the university\u2019s strategic ambitions. Focused particularly on collaborations that will support the development of new solutions to enable just and fair net zero transitions, a new Net Zero Centre is being developed in the Faculty of Natural, Mathematical and & [sic] Engineering Sciences, and an Institute of Sustainable Business in the King\u2019s Business School.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It all seems very cosy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u201cMission Zero\u201d report<\/a> is described on its face as an \u201cIndependent Review of Net Zero<\/em>\u201d. My Concise Oxford English Dictionary describes \u201cindependent\u201d as: \u201c1. Free from outside control; not subject to another\u2019s authority\u2026Not supported by public funds. 2. Not depending on another for livelihood or subsistence. Capable of acting or thinking for oneself. 3. Not connected with another\u2026<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are undoubtedly some senses in which the report might reasonably be described as independent, but in other respects, I would argue less so. Given the capacity to mislead, I think it would be better if a potentially ambiguous term such as \u201cindependent\u201d had been avoided in this context. It\u2019s also worth noting that this \u201cindependent\u201d review of net zero wasn\u2019t asked to review the merits of net zero, rather (from the introduction to the report):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026this Independent Review of Net Zero was commissioned in September 2022, to ask how the UK could better meet its net zero commitments, taking account of these global changes. It was commissioned also to ask how the UK might deliver its own net zero targets in a manner that was both more affordable, more efficient, and in a pro-business and pro-enterprise way\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A search of the document for \u201ccarbon capture\u201d reveals 36 mentions of the term. A whole section (2.7, commencing on page 122) is headed \u201cReducing emissions through carbon capture and removal\u201d:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UK is uniquely placed to be a global leader in Carbon Capture Usage and Storage (CCUS), which will play a critical role in the transition to net zero. We must act quickly to foster certainty and attract the investment that we need. Key recommendations: \u2022 In 2023, government must act quickly to re-envisage and implement a clear CCUS roadmap, showing the plan beyond 2030. As part of the roadmap, government should take a pragmatic approach to cluster selection. This means allowing the most advanced clusters to progress more quickly. \u2022 By 2024, government must develop a strategy for the plan for non-pipeline transport and how dispersed sites and mini clusters can connect to the CCS network and what support should be offered for doing so. \u2022 As soon as legislation allows, government must finalise the business models and regulatory frameworks across the value chain, including for industrial CCS, Energy from Waste with CCS and CO2 transport and storage. \u2022 In 2023 HMT should set out the funding envelope available to support Track-1 CCUS clusters.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have no doubt that Mr Skidmore sincerely believes in all of the above, and indeed of the putative benefits of, and need for, a UK net zero policy. I would just feel a bit more comfortable if the person conducting an \u201cindependent\u201d review of net zero, who made such recommendations, didn\u2019t receive \u00a380,000 p.a. from The Emissions Capture Company \u201cfor providing advice on the global energy transition and decarbonisation<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Deben (aka John Selwyn Gummer)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Deben, known to those of us of a certain age as the Conservative minister John Selwyn Gummer when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister, has for ten years been the Chair of the Climate Change Committee, set up under the Climate Change Act to advise the UK Government regarding its obligations under the Act. He is now stepping down, and Professor Piers Forster has been appointed as interim Chair of the Committee until a permanent replacement is appointed. Lord Deben has been a vociferous advocate of net zero policies, and I commented on an example of his interview style here<\/a> noting his comment that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well just a moment, you <\/em>can\u2019t <\/strong><\/em><\/strong>revise the targets, because the targets are in the law, and they can\u2019t change the law unless the Committee on Climate Change gives them permission, and we\u2019re not going to.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately, I have found the website \u201cThey Work For You\u201d to be less helpful with regard to those Parliamentarians who are in the Lords, and the House of Lords Register of Interests<\/a> seemed somewhat opaque by comparison. Nevertheless enough is visible to spot another jet-setting lifestyle, in the cause of addressing climate change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to China, October 2010, to act as Joint Chairman of Chinese\/Globe Climate Change Conference; travel and accommodation paid by Globe International<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Brazil, February 2011, as Chairman of Globe International, to co-ordinate plans with Brazilian authorities for Rio+20; travel and accommodation paid by Globe International<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to China, February 2011, as follow-up to previous visit in connection with Chinese\/Globe Climate Change Conference; travel and accommodation paid by Globe International<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Brussels, May 2011, as Chairman of Globe International, to launch legislative study; travel and accommodation paid by Globe International<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 14-19 June 2012, as Chairman of Globe International, to host and take part in discussions for Rio+20; travel and accommodation paid by Globe International<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Beijing, China, 17-20 April 2013, as President of Globe International, to sign the agreement between the Congress and the House of Representatives for the meeting of the Second World Summit of Legislators on climate change; travel and accommodation paid by Globe International<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Mexico City and Pueblo, Mexico, 13 May 2013, as President of Globe International, to have meetings with Ministers and the Leader of the National People\u2019s Congress on climate change<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Toronto, Canada, 23-25 October 2013, to address Electricity Distributors Association Annual Executive Symposium; travel and accommodation paid by Electricity Distributors Association<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Oslo, Norway, 30-31 October 2013, to address Statoil Offshore Wind Summit; travel and accommodation paid by Statoil<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Mexico City, Mexico, 6-8 June 2014, as President of Globe International to attend the Second Globe World Summit of Legislators<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Oslo, Norway, 18 June 2014, to address Transport and Environment \u2013 Measures and Policies (TEMPO) Final Conference; travel and expenses paid by TEMPO<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to Tokyo, 28 January \u2013 2 February 2017, for meetings on climate change and speech on stranded assets; travel expenses met by Smith Institute, Oxford<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Visit to New Zealand, 16-28 February 2017, for a programme of speeches on climate change in Universities of Wellington and Auckland and meetings with Government Ministers and Opposition leaders and addressing Blue Green Conference; travel expenses met by National Party of New Zealand<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Deben was for some time Chair of Veolia Limited, and the question of possible conflicts of interest was raised at the time of his appointment as Chair of the Climate Change Committee. An interesting letter<\/a> about this matter was sent by Sir Robert Smith on behalf of the Energy and Climate Change Committee to Lord Deben on 9th<\/sup> July 2013, which contains this section:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026when we asked about your interests in the [sic] Veolia Water, you reassured us that its remit was not relevant to your role as Chair of the Committee on Climate Change. After the pre-appointment hearing, it came to our attention that Veolia Water had a role in grid connections and other energy related work. This fact was publicised on its website, and in the forward to its annual report, signed by you, in the same month as the hearing. You have highlighted that the part of Veolia water dealing with grid connections is a subsidiary and that you were not involved in commercial decisions about this area of work. DECC has detailed steps that you have taken to avoid any perceived conflict of interest. Nevertheless, it is disappointing that the full remit of Veolia Water was not disclosed to the Committee at the time of the pre-appointment hearing. We had specifically requested information about your interests before the hearing took place. It is of concern that the steps outlined in the enclosed Secretary of State\u2019s letter were only taken after we had pursued this matter in the months following the publication of our report\u2026.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The matter was obviously resolved to the satisfaction of the Committee, as Lord Deben\u2019s appointment was confirmed and so far as I can ascertain no further action was found to be necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sancroft International<\/a> is among Lord Deben\u2019s declared interests. As its website<\/a> says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Rt. Hon John Gummer, Lord Deben, is the founder and Chairman of Sancroft International, a consultancy that advises both businesses and investors on all areas of Sustainability and ESG.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This role has not been without (possibly confected) controversy. As Energy Live News<\/a> put it in 2019:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Deben, Chairman of the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), has been hit by conflict of interest claims regarding the relationship between his government position and family-owned business.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A newspaper investigation alleges Sancroft International has been paid more than \u00a3600,000 from green businesses that could potentially profit from the Conservative peer\u2019s advice to Ministers.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rules dictate all MPs, peers and public officials must officially declare their outside earnings and interests \u2013 while Lord Deben\u2019s position as the Chairman of the private firm had been announced, official records show he has not publicly declared any payments received from green firms.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

He has denied any conflict of interest and said he had fully complied with disclosure rules, insisting the work his company undertook did not involve climate change issues.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the Daily Mail claims the firm has been paid by at least nine businesses and campaign groups involved in projects to cut greenhouse gases, including electric car battery producers, venture capital firms involved with solar projects and Drax, which receives around \u00a3700 million a year in government subsidies.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Lords Commissioner for Standards opened an investigation into this matter, but found no evidence of wrongdoing, saying<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201c\u2026how Lord Deben and Sancroft might benefit from Lord Deben speaking in favour of a policy which might at some point benefit a minority aspect of Johnson Mattheys work is not made clear in the complaints or evidence\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026Having investigated the allegations and gathered the relevant facts, I do not consider Lord Deben\u2019s interest in Sancroft or its clients to be relevant interests that required declaration.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last year Lord Deben\u2019s interests were updated in the register to make it clear that Sancroft International advises Greencoat Capital Limited on sustainability. As Guido Fawkes noted<\/a> shortly afterwards:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greencoat Capital (now Schroders Greencoat) happen to describe themselves as \u201ca specialist manager dedicated to the renewable energy infrastructure sector.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the interest has been fully declared, it is therefore transparent and within the rules, and it seems that there is no conflict of interest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have highlighted the activities of the three gentlemen above for no reason other than that they are among the most vociferous Parliamentarians advocating for net zero and criticising the Government (despite all being Conservatives) at the slightest sign of a slackening of the pace towards net zero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All three have registered their interests as required; the system has worked as it is supposed to do, inasmuch as their interests are recorded and fully transparent. No laws have been broken. None of them have done anything wrong. No impropriety has taken place. All three have complied absolutely with the rules as they apply to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yet I\u2019m not happy. I think the rules should be changed. I leave it to you, dear reader, to contemplate whether or not you agree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From Climate Scepticism BY\u00a0MARK HODGSON \u2026but also for others I don\u2019t think being an MP is an easy job. Sitting on committees, attending debates in the House of Commons, scrutinising legislation, attending functions in your constituency, holding surgeries and assisting constituents with their problems \u2013 all are time-consuming and potentially demanding. To be a dedicated […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":282342,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"However, do all MPs work as hard as they should? Are they all as effective as they might be? ","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818056,691818076,691823412,691823411,691818154],"class_list":{"0":"post-282339","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change","9":"tag-co2","10":"tag-house-of-commons","11":"tag-mps","12":"tag-net-zero","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/00plane-gangway-1473479.jpg?fit=1600%2C1200&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1brR","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273158,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=273158","url_meta":{"origin":282339,"position":0},"title":"The Tories are trapped by net zero\u00a0legislation","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/13\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Government is\u00a0facing an uprising\u00a0in its own Tory heartlands against a key element of its net zero climate policy. From 2026, it will be illegal to buy a new oil boiler, and households will be encouraged to switch to heat pumps. This is especially problematic in rural areas that are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0co2-6317012_1920-1536x1024-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0co2-6317012_1920-1536x1024-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0co2-6317012_1920-1536x1024-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0co2-6317012_1920-1536x1024-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0co2-6317012_1920-1536x1024-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":406793,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406793","url_meta":{"origin":282339,"position":1},"title":"Will The Green Tory Blob Allow Kemi To Cancel Net\u00a0Zero?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Kemi Badenoch has now confirmed that she will scrap the Climate Change Act, along with its Net Zero targets.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Change Act (CCA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Change Act (CCA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change-act-cca"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQPyqNseivru1kyEp3n2OJD8m0-vHi0AS4SpprfOtjViQMBP6dO2WtDV_OVo_iswsPHFNPxtY3B6_fBhCW7u9z2EzNVLW0CBdP0H5u35l71rlD2nFsbG4SEeuFtEcRHF.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223286,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=223286","url_meta":{"origin":282339,"position":2},"title":"Liz Truss to ban solar projects on farms\u00a0","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/11\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Some pushbacks against the excesses of climate obsession.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-509.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-509.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-509.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-509.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363278,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363278","url_meta":{"origin":282339,"position":3},"title":"Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey: Go Back to Your Constituencies and Prepare to Live in Mud and Grass Huts","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/25\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"As we noted on Tuesday, supporters of the bill are either zealots or boobies. The zealots have a political campaign to pursue and know full well what they are doing, but the boobies are almost certainly unaware of the vital role that hydrocarbons play in the modern economy. Hydrocarbons are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"British Parliament\"","block_context":{"text":"British Parliament","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=british-parliament"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-23-180450.jpeg?fit=1181%2C664&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-23-180450.jpeg?fit=1181%2C664&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-23-180450.jpeg?fit=1181%2C664&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-23-180450.jpeg?fit=1181%2C664&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-23-180450.jpeg?fit=1181%2C664&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316962,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=316962","url_meta":{"origin":282339,"position":4},"title":"Time for MPs to Come Clean About the Green Blob","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"For years, perhaps decades, the cross-party Westminster consensus on climate change has been a suffocating orthodoxy that limited debate about energy and other policy agendas, leaving Britain under-resourced and facing the consequences of energy prices that are out of control. But then, just a year and a bit after the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Billionaires\"","block_context":{"text":"Billionaires","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=billionaires"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-112.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-112.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-112.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-112.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295151,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=295151","url_meta":{"origin":282339,"position":5},"title":"Online Rag Funded by Green Billionaires Peddles Cheap Smear About Tory MP and Shoots Itself in Foot","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/15\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Hold the front page!\u00a0DeSmog\u00a0reports\u00a0that the U.K.\u2019s Energy and Net Zero Minister Claire Coutinho has taken a donation from a \u201cclimate science denial funder\u201d. Lord Michael Hintze is alleged to have given \u00a32,000 to the minister\u2019s local constituency \u2013 a sum that should keep local volunteers supplied with paper clips and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Ben Pile\"","block_context":{"text":"Ben Pile","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ben-pile"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0SPRH6NWGVUKKNLOO6LCFBP6URQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0SPRH6NWGVUKKNLOO6LCFBP6URQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0SPRH6NWGVUKKNLOO6LCFBP6URQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0SPRH6NWGVUKKNLOO6LCFBP6URQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0SPRH6NWGVUKKNLOO6LCFBP6URQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=282339"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282344,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282339\/revisions\/282344"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/282342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=282339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=282339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=282339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}