{"id":280402,"date":"2023-09-25T20:54:41","date_gmt":"2023-09-25T18:54:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280402"},"modified":"2023-09-25T20:54:44","modified_gmt":"2023-09-25T18:54:44","slug":"climate-doomsters-in-drivers-seat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280402","title":{"rendered":"Climate Doomsters in Driver\u2019s\u00a0Seat"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Science Matters<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Ron Clutz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Joe Oliver wrote at Financial Post We are in the grip of climate-change catastrophism.<\/strong><\/a>  Excerpts in italics with my bolds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate-change movement is a powerful cultural entity.<\/strong>\u00a0It does not affirm or negate the reality of\u00a0its core narrative<\/strong>, which\u00a0is for science to decide<\/strong>.\u00a0Culture does, however, explain the power and prevalence of the narrative,<\/strong>\u00a0the political and societal responses to it and the apparent\u00a0willingness of many people to incur immense cost to avert a supposed existential threat, without proof of either its existence or our ability to alter its impact<\/strong>. In a new book available from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, The Grip of Culture: the Social Psychology of Climate Change Catastrophism,\u00a0Andy A. West,<\/strong>\u00a0who works for the Philosophy Foundation in London,\u00a0provides an academic analysis of the phenomenon. Its lessons have particular relevance to Canada\u2019s climate obsession.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

As we know,\u00a0the overarching climate narrative<\/strong>\u00a0is that human GHG emissions have created a climate emergency that calls for urgent and extraordinary action, without which the consequences for humanity will be catastrophic. In many ways, its\u00a0cultural characteristics parallel religions and ideological movements,<\/strong>\u00a0starting with\u00a0an unshakable foundational belief impervious to contradictory evidence<\/strong>, and extending to\u00a0incessant incantations from politicians, mainstream media, thought leaders and environmentalists<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The faithful are reassured by groupthink, while apostates or sinful skeptics,
i.e. \u201cdeniers,\u201d are vilified, penalized and ostracized.<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Environment and Climate Change Minister Steven Guilbeault\u2019s veiled threat to charge Premier Scott Moe of Saskatchewan criminally<\/strong> if he violates federal coal regulations evokes Thomas of Torquemada, Grand Inquisitor of the Spanish Inquisition \u2014 though so far absent the burnings at the stake<\/strong>. The movement has its high priests and priestesses \u2014 Al Gore, Justin Trudeau, Greta Thunberg, King Charles and Mark Carney, none a scientist \u2014 who convey certainty to the multitudes.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Core principles and a multitude of subsidiary\u00a0tenets are validated by exaggerated interpretations<\/strong>\u00a0of scientific studies, as well as\u00a0anecdotal evidence and conveniently chosen statistics<\/strong>\u00a0that reinforce the sacred text.\u00a0For example, the end of the Little Ice Age<\/strong>\u00a0is invariably the\u00a0starting point for calculating a global temperature increase<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 which is like a government calculating its effects on economic growth by starting at the trough of the last recession.\u00a0Confirmation bias is provided by influencers<\/strong>, including\u00a0uniquely unqualified Hollywood stars,<\/strong>\u00a0who propagate the doctrine of the faith. Fear is employed as a powerful motivator and is inculcated from childhood.\u00a0Apocalyptic doom is preordained<\/strong>\u00a0for collective disobedience and\u00a0salvation promised for devotees<\/strong>\u00a0and repentants who comply with onerous strictures, many of which have no practical utility.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The instinctive\u00a0response<\/strong>\u00a0from climate alarmists\u00a0to public hesitancy is that \u201cthe science is settled,\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0the facts are overwhelming and the need so urgent they\u00a0can\u2019t waste time quibbling<\/strong>\u00a0with ignorant or malevolent naysayers who in any case are probably racist, misogynist, far-right conspiracists.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Climate alarmists have a fundamental problem,<\/strong>\u00a0however, which may help explain their stridency. The complexity of\u00a0climate science is not settled,<\/strong>\u00a0as Steve E. Koonin, a physicist and former undersecretary for science in Barack Obama\u2019s Department of Energy, explained in his 2021 book, Unsettled. Other prominent scientists agree, although they are a distinct minority.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Nor is climate apocalypse supported by<\/strong>\u00a0the UN\u2019s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change\u00a0(IPCC),<\/strong>\u00a0even though its conclusions go farther than the scientific studies on which it allegedly relies. Proffered evidence is based on models that have consistently run hot. Yet the conventional consensus is to accept at face value the\u00a0predictions of people who have been consistently and spectacularly wrong<\/strong>\u00a0and who, if they were around in the 1970\u2019s, were more than likely to have issued dire warnings about an impending ice age, like Paul Ehrlich and Kenneth Watt, as well as newspapers and journals like Time, Science Digest, The New York Times and Newsweek.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Barring a miraculous technological innovation, there is
virtually no chance of reaching global net zero by 2050.<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two-thirds of GHG emissions come from poorer countries that are deliberately increasing their use of fossil fuels,<\/strong> while the developed economies, including Canada, have consistently failed to reach the targets they have set themselves. And it takes centuries for excess carbon dioxide to disappear from the atmosphere, so any partial reduction in anthropogenic emissions would only slow their increase, not prevent it or eliminate them. Nevertheless, McKinsey says $275 trillion may be spent on the doomed gesture,<\/strong> disproportionately hurting the least advantaged and weakening the West in what may actually be an existential struggle with an expansionist communist China.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Andy West writes that\u00a0culture can be a great unifier<\/strong>\u00a0of societies and even civilizations. But because it is\u00a0not based on reason, it can also be extraordinarily destructive:<\/strong>\u00a0witness the calamities perpetrated by communism and fascism. So it is\u00a0uncertain where climate catastrophism may lead or what<\/strong>\u00a0negative feedback could potentially provoke a\u00a0counter-reaction.<\/strong>\u00a0Last year\u2019s European energy crisis did undermine support for it, even if green activists claimed it proved we need more of the renewable energy that had in fact made the continent more vulnerable to higher prices and inadequate supply.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Zeitgeists do change. When people have to choose between food and heat and when the poorest countries are deprived of the affordable energy they desperately need to raise themselves up, then\u00a0practicality and guilt may eventually change people\u2019s beliefs.<\/strong>\u00a0That they haven\u2019t yet done so demonstrates the\u00a0power of culture in the face of logic, morality, self-interest and the facts.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Addendum:  <\/strong><\/em><\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Retraction of Paper Saying There is No Climate Emergency Illustrates How Dependent Climate Activists Are on Scaremongering<\/strong><\/a> by Chris Morris at Daily Sceptic.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The recent cancellation<\/a> of Alimonti et al shows clearly that catastrophising bad weather events and attributing them to<\/strong> a collapse of the climate is now the main weapon<\/strong> deployed to scare populations into embracing the Net Zero agenda<\/strong>. Of course, reference is still made to global warming<\/strong>, but most recent rises<\/strong> seem to owe more to frequent upward retrospective adjustments of temperature,<\/strong> rather than any significant natural boost. Perhaps we should not be surprised by this turn of events. In a short essay titled \u2018The New Apocalypticism<\/a>\u2019, the science writer Roger Pielke Jr. noted: \u201cFor the secular millenarian, extreme events \u2013 floods, hurricanes, fires<\/strong> \u2013 are more than mere portents, they are evidence of our sins of the past<\/strong> and provide opportunities for redemption in the future, if only we listen, accept and change.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate is collapsing all around us, shout the headlines \u2013 they require we ignore the data, the historical record, even common sense.<\/strong> When all is said and done, the Earth is not actually boiling! Well Professor Gianluca Alimonti and three other Italian scientists didn\u2019t ignore the past data<\/strong>, much of it in fact from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and they found little change in extreme weather events.<\/strong> They published a paper concluding that there was certainly not enough to justify the declaration of a \u2018climate emergency\u2019.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A year later, the publisher Springer Nature bowed to the demands of a group of activist scientists<\/strong> and journalists led by the Guardian and Agence France-Presse and retracted the non-conforming paper.<\/strong> An addendum was proposed and sent to four reviewers for comment. Three reviewers argued for publication. The fourth stated that typical readers were not climate experts and \u201ceditors should seriously consider the implications of the possible publication of this addendum\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We own climate science<\/strong>, boasted UN<\/strong> communications flak Melissa Fleming<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>at a recent World Economic Forum disinformation seminar, and we partner with Google to keep our version at the top of the search list.<\/strong> What a great service these climate experts provide in telling us what to think and see<\/strong> as we unsophisticated rubes struggle towards the path of true enlightenment!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the distinguished climatologist Dr. Judith Curry,<\/strong> the Alimonti affair is \u201cwhy I no longer publish in peer-reviewed papers\u201d. She described the behaviour of the journal editors as \u201creprehensible\u201d<\/strong> in retracting a widely read climate paper just because it contained \u201cpolitically inconvenient conclusions\u201d. She is right of course \u2013 the Alimonti affair is another shocking scientific scandal that casts further doubt on the climate science peer-review process<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But then, Dr. Curry is merely a scientist in all this
\u2013she doesn\u2019t own the science.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Climate alarmists have a fundamental problem,\u00a0however, which may help explain their stridency. The complexity of\u00a0climate science is not settled,\u00a0as Steve E. Koonin, a physicist and former undersecretary for science in Barack Obama\u2019s Department of Energy, explained in his 2021 book, Unsettled. Other prominent scientists agree, although they are a distinct minority.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":280423,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818721,691818056,691818152,691818288,691820922],"class_list":{"0":"post-280402","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-alarmists","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-climate-emergency","11":"tag-global-temperature","12":"tag-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-764.png?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1aWC","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":349421,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=349421","url_meta":{"origin":280402,"position":0},"title":"Democrats Anti-Science Climate Extremism Failing \u2013 Fear of Global Warming & Climate Change Falls Further off Top 10 Fears Listing","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Orange County Register published a spreadsheet on October 27, 2024 (shown below) presenting results of Chapman University\u2019s 10th\u00a0annual update of their study \u201cOur Fears and How They\u2019ve Changed\u201d survey.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmist\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmist","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmist"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00Screenshot-2024-10-29-153757.png?fit=1160%2C950&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00Screenshot-2024-10-29-153757.png?fit=1160%2C950&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00Screenshot-2024-10-29-153757.png?fit=1160%2C950&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00Screenshot-2024-10-29-153757.png?fit=1160%2C950&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00Screenshot-2024-10-29-153757.png?fit=1160%2C950&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":387412,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=387412","url_meta":{"origin":280402,"position":1},"title":"\u201cClimate Change\u201d in Leftist\u00a0Eyes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In a recent\u00a0interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Joe Rogan\u00a0touched on the issue of climate change, a favorite talking point for Sanders.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate activists\"","block_context":{"text":"climate activists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-activists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332801,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332801","url_meta":{"origin":280402,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Skeptical Science\u2019 Gets Comeuppance on Social Media","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cLet\u2019s see if Skeptical Science makes another appearance on LinkedIn. It is up to 458 follows. And see if this organization will simply prepare an entry on what \u2018skeptic\u2019 arguments are the best. With that middle ground, maybe we can have a real debate.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0-misinformation.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0-misinformation.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0-misinformation.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0-misinformation.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0-misinformation.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329159,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=329159","url_meta":{"origin":280402,"position":3},"title":"The Goodness of Global\u00a0Warming","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Both the last eight+ years of a cooling trend and the last century and a half of moderate warming portend no imminent catastrophe, but should be celebrated.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AdobeStock_266865139-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AdobeStock_266865139-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AdobeStock_266865139-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AdobeStock_266865139-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AdobeStock_266865139-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352778,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=352778","url_meta":{"origin":280402,"position":4},"title":"Dear Climate Alarmists, Welcome to Your Worst Nightmare","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/11\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"For most of my adult life, climate alarmists have ruled the day as they have methodically and successfully injected their relentless fearmongering and bogus science throughout academia, the mainstream media, Hollywood, and just about every other major, powerful cultural institution. While this has paid giant dividends in recent years, it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0raising-the-alarm.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0raising-the-alarm.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0raising-the-alarm.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0raising-the-alarm.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0raising-the-alarm.webp?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336419,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336419","url_meta":{"origin":280402,"position":5},"title":"Climate Lawfare Heats Up – The Climate Realism Show\u00a0#118","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The weather is heating up, and so is the \"climate lawfare\" radicals are using to impose draconian policies that would impoverish the masses, and even put some people in jail. On episode #118 of The Climate Realism Show we will cover that story; plus say goodbye to Jim Inhofe, one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate lawfare\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate lawfare","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-lawfare"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-13-152752.png?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-13-152752.png?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-13-152752.png?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-13-152752.png?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-13-152752.png?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=280402"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":280425,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280402\/revisions\/280425"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/280423"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=280402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=280402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=280402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}