{"id":280131,"date":"2023-09-23T20:23:23","date_gmt":"2023-09-23T18:23:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280131"},"modified":"2023-09-23T20:23:55","modified_gmt":"2023-09-23T18:23:55","slug":"carbon-credits-the-predictable-unraveling-of-a-flawed-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280131","title":{"rendered":"Carbon Credits: The Predictable Unraveling of a Flawed System"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"452\" data-attachment-id=\"280135\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=280135\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?fit=2560%2C1600&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"2560,1600\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"01982032\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?fit=723%2C452&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=723%2C452&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-280135\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=1024%2C640&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=300%2C188&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=768%2C480&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=1536%2C960&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=2048%2C1280&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?resize=1200%2C750&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?w=2169&amp;ssl=1 2169w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"685\" data-attachment-id=\"280132\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=280132\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-721.png?fit=786%2C745&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"786,745\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-721\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-721.png?fit=723%2C685&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-721.png?resize=723%2C685&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-280132\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-721.png?w=786&amp;ssl=1 786w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-721.png?resize=300%2C284&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-721.png?resize=768%2C728&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Whaddya mean the Indulgences don\u2019t live up to their hype?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The world of carbon credits has long been presented as a major tool for supposed climate woes. Advocates of this system have been quick to sing its praises, positioning it as the ultimate solution for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. But skeptics, like yours truly, have long pointed out the inherent flaws in such a system. Now, even The Guardian, a publication that has been a staunch advocate of climate alarmism, seems to be having second thoughts. It\u2019s almost as if they\u2019re saying, \u201cOops, maybe the skeptics had a point.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Guardian\u2019s Late Awakening<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2023\/sep\/19\/do-carbon-credit-reduce-emissions-greenhouse-gases\">The article from The Guardian&nbsp;<\/a>delves deep into the world of carbon credits, questioning their actual impact on reducing emissions. It\u2019s almost amusing to see them now asking:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cCarbon credits are supposed to offset the emissions caused by companies and individuals. But do they really reduce greenhouse gases?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2023\/sep\/19\/do-carbon-credit-reduce-emissions-greenhouse-gases\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2023\/sep\/19\/do-carbon-credit-reduce-emissions-greenhouse-gases<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A question that should have been asked and critically examined long before jumping on the carbon credit bandwagon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Mirage of Offsetting<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Guardian highlights a significant concern: the illusion of offsetting. Purchasing carbon credits doesn\u2019t necessarily equate to genuine offsetting of emissions. Many of these credits are tied to projects that would have been executed regardless, meaning no real reduction in emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMany of the projects supported by carbon credits, such as the construction of windfarms and solar parks, would have been built anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In essence, it\u2019s a system that allows companies to parade their \u201cgreen\u201d credentials without making any tangible changes to their carbon footprint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Inconsistencies of Carbon Credit Accounting<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The article also sheds light on the convoluted and inconsistent world of carbon credit accounting. With no unified standard and a lack of rigorous oversight, it\u2019s a system rife with potential for manipulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere is no single standard for carbon credits, and critics argue that this has allowed projects that do not deliver real-world emissions reductions to flourish.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s a system that skeptics have long warned about, and it seems these concerns were not unfounded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A Misguided Approach<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Guardian\u2019s article suggests that carbon credits, while potentially playing a role in the transition to a low-carbon economy, cannot replace genuine efforts to reduce emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhile carbon credits can play a role in the transition to a low-carbon economy, they cannot replace genuine efforts to reduce emissions.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But let\u2019s be clear: the very premise of transitioning to a \u201clow-carbon economy\u201d based on the current climate narrative is questionable. The entire carbon credit system is built on a foundation of misguided intentions and collective alarmist groupthink.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Guardian\u2019s newfound skepticism towards carbon credits is a telling sign of the system\u2019s inherent flaws. While it\u2019s somewhat satisfying to see them finally question a system that skeptics have long criticized, one can\u2019t help but wonder about the time, resources, and efforts wasted on such a flawed approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Genuine progress doesn\u2019t come from blindly following trends or from virtue signaling. It requires a grounded, pragmatic approach. The carbon credit saga serves as a reminder that it\u2019s high time we move beyond the current climate narrative\u2019s fads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">H\/T Alan B<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The world of carbon credits has long been presented as a major tool for supposed climate woes. Advocates of this system have been quick to sing its praises, positioning it as the ultimate solution for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. But skeptics, like yours truly, have long pointed out the inherent flaws in such a system.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":280135,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691822903,691818076,691822904,691818154,691818262],"class_list":{"0":"post-280131","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-credits","9":"tag-co2","10":"tag-low-carbon-economy-2","11":"tag-net-zero","12":"tag-the-guardian","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/01982032.jpg?fit=2560%2C1600&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1aSf","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":379633,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=379633","url_meta":{"origin":280131,"position":0},"title":"DAC Dying? (\u201ccorporate theater wrapped in a green ribbon\u201d)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/05\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRemoving CO\u2082 from ambient air is a thermodynamic slog,\u201d continues Barnard. \u201cThe concentration is a measly 0.04% \u2014 less than one molecule in 2,500.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon capture and storage (CCS)\u00a0projects\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon capture and storage (CCS)\u00a0projects","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-capture-and-storage-ccs-projects"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0ChatGPT-Image-23.-Mai-2025-19_54_11.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0ChatGPT-Image-23.-Mai-2025-19_54_11.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0ChatGPT-Image-23.-Mai-2025-19_54_11.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0ChatGPT-Image-23.-Mai-2025-19_54_11.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345689,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=345689","url_meta":{"origin":280131,"position":1},"title":"The fatal flaw in Artificial Intelligence: Climate Change?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"AI\u2019s role in amplifying dominant narratives will continue to stifle dissent, limit open debate, and impose restrictive controls on society. If we allow this to continue unchecked, AI will become a tool for shaping thought, controlling discourse, and eroding the very freedoms it was meant to empower.","rel":"","context":"In \"Artificial Intelligence (AI)\"","block_context":{"text":"Artificial Intelligence (AI)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=artificial-intelligence-ai"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ainaturaldisban.jpg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ainaturaldisban.jpg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ainaturaldisban.jpg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ainaturaldisban.jpg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0ainaturaldisban.jpg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314204,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=314204","url_meta":{"origin":280131,"position":2},"title":"Study: Aussie Outback Carbon Offset Tree Planting \u201c\u2026 not reducing emissions as promised \u2026\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/03\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Researchers find carbon offsets approach, which is supposed to regenerate scrubby outback forests, was not reducing emissions as promised","rel":"","context":"In \"Australia\"","block_context":{"text":"Australia","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=australia"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0AdobeStock_192559572.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0AdobeStock_192559572.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0AdobeStock_192559572.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0AdobeStock_192559572.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0AdobeStock_192559572.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222326,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=222326","url_meta":{"origin":280131,"position":3},"title":"Carbon Offsets: Want to Get Sued? (Greenwashing as illegality)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The radical environmentalists\u2019 war on \u201cgreenwashing\u201d is a major front in the futile crusade for CO2 mitigation. Perhaps true environmentalists should redirect their aim at grid-connected wind, solar, and batteries instead","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-242.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-242.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-242.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-242.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-242.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344415,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=344415","url_meta":{"origin":280131,"position":4},"title":"Academic Echo Chambers and the Myth of Behavioral Spillover in Climate Action","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/09\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The article\u00a0\u201cThe Chicken or the Egg? Spillover between Private Climate Action and Climate Policy Support\u201d\u00a0is a remarkable example of what can only be described as academic tail-chasing. What begins as an exploration of the interplay between individual climate actions\u2014like reducing meat consumption\u2014and broader policy support quickly morphs into an intellectual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bad Science\"","block_context":{"text":"Bad Science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bad-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/image-538.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/image-538.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/image-538.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/image-538.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344943,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=344943","url_meta":{"origin":280131,"position":5},"title":"Gergis Accuses Aussie Government of Emissions \u201cTrickery\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Jo\u00eblle Gergis, who had\u00a0an erroneous hockey stick climate paper spectacularly withdrawn in 2012, has accused Aussie politicians of using \u201ctrickery\u201d to conceal climate policy failures.","rel":"","context":"In \"Australia\"","block_context":{"text":"Australia","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=australia"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0Joelle-Gergis-header-1-1400x1138-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C975&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0Joelle-Gergis-header-1-1400x1138-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C975&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0Joelle-Gergis-header-1-1400x1138-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C975&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0Joelle-Gergis-header-1-1400x1138-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C975&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0Joelle-Gergis-header-1-1400x1138-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C975&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=280131"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":280138,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280131\/revisions\/280138"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/280135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=280131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=280131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=280131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}