{"id":279238,"date":"2023-09-18T09:08:12","date_gmt":"2023-09-18T07:08:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=279238"},"modified":"2023-09-18T09:08:15","modified_gmt":"2023-09-18T07:08:15","slug":"how-to-settle-the-patrick-brown-affair","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=279238","title":{"rendered":"How to Settle the Patrick Brown\u00a0Affair"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

BY\u00a0JOHN RIDGWAY<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A suggestion for Dr Ken Rice<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I had the idea this morning that it would be a good thing to watch Dr Ken Rice being interviewed<\/a> on a podcast in which he shares his wisdom regarding the Patrick Brown affair<\/a>. The podcast runs to the best part of an hour and so my decision had the potential of ruining a Sunday morning. Fortunately, I had the good sense to bail out at the point when Dr Rice and his interviewer started to discuss the evidence for there being any editorial bias regarding climate change attribution papers. Despite Dr Rice\u2019s promise to steelman, it seemed to me quite obvious that he was actually strawmanning. How is it, asks Dr Rice, that Dr Brown can claim bias on the basis of just one paper (with no more than an allusion to a single other paper that got rejected)? Absolutely, agreed his interviewer. Surely you would need to run some sort of extended, controlled experiment. Snorting and sniggering throughout, like Beavis and Butthead, the two professors could not hide their disdain for the flimsy evidence that Dr Brown was deemed to be offering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well let me see if I can help Dr Rice out. What Dr Brown is asserting is that the attribution papers that get published invariably control for non-climatic factors in order to isolate the strength of climatic causation (see, for example, everything that Friederike Otto has published). This is all very well, of course, but to complete the causal analysis one should also control for the climatic in order to isolate the strength of the non-climatic causations. Only then can you make meaningful comparisons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So there is no need to run an experiment, Dr Rice, and no need to just take Dr Brown\u2019s word for it. Just survey the published literature (you might want to start with Nature<\/em>) and count up the number of published studies that control for the non-climatic and then do the same regarding the climatic. If the papers are about equal in number then you can reject Brown\u2019s allegations. If controlling for the non-climatic is prevalent then an explanation for such an imbalance will be required. Simply saying that it reflects the relative importance of the climatic factors would be begging the question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And before you even think about it, remember that Dr Brown was referring to a failure to quantify causation, and so pointing to papers that just mention, consider or discuss non-climatic factors will not count. The quantification is essential because only then will you have a measured basis upon which to formulate a correctly prioritised risk mitigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, once you have performed the exercise, write it up in a paper and get Nature<\/em> to publish it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I look forward to reading the results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

And before you even think about it, remember that Dr Brown was referring to a failure to quantify causation, and so pointing to papers that just mention, consider or discuss non-climatic factors will not count. The quantification is essential because only then will you have a measured basis upon which to formulate a correctly prioritised risk mitigation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":279241,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821564,691822693,691822694,691822363],"class_list":["post-279238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-control","tag-dr-ken-rice","tag-non-climatic-causations","tag-patrick-brown","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Screenshot-2023-09-09-155955.png?fit=1052%2C594&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1aDQ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282036,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282036","url_meta":{"origin":279238,"position":0},"title":"Let No Lying Dog\u00a0Sleep","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Angry dog From Climate Scepticism BY\u00a0JOHN RIDGWAY The Grantham Institute barks You may recall that last month climate scientist Professor Patrick T. Brown of the Breakthrough Institute caused a bit of a\u00a0furore\u00a0by pointing out how extreme weather event attribution studies invariably restrict their quantification to climatic causation only, thereby excluding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Brief\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Brief","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-brief"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0aggressive-dog-barking-at-visitor.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372792,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=372792","url_meta":{"origin":279238,"position":1},"title":"The Science of\u00a0Misdirection","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/30\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Who doesn\u2019t love a good magician? Yes, they can be a bit cheesy at times, but a good one can make you believe that they actually do have magical powers. Of course, the truth is far more mundane. Despite appearances, these folk are not supernatural, they are just masters of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate science\"","block_context":{"text":"climate science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/034484_hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/034484_hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/034484_hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/034484_hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/034484_hd.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257566,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=257566","url_meta":{"origin":279238,"position":2},"title":"Debunking Lomborg","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/15\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The only reason I have brought up this debunking video now is because it indirectly relates to the recent\u00a0evaluation\u00a0of IPCC\u2019s AR6 published by the Clintel group.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate-related deaths\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate-related deaths","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-related-deaths"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/climate-deaths-1920-2021-e1641483852495-1-1024x918-1.webp?fit=1024%2C918&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/climate-deaths-1920-2021-e1641483852495-1-1024x918-1.webp?fit=1024%2C918&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/climate-deaths-1920-2021-e1641483852495-1-1024x918-1.webp?fit=1024%2C918&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/climate-deaths-1920-2021-e1641483852495-1-1024x918-1.webp?fit=1024%2C918&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278142,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278142","url_meta":{"origin":279238,"position":3},"title":"Burn the Witch!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a long-established principle of scientific enquiry that if you want to understand the structure of something, then just give it a bang and see how it rattles. It is a technique that crops up in a number of different guises from seismography and spectrography to magnetic resonance imaging;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-310.png?fit=1024%2C654&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282965,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282965","url_meta":{"origin":279238,"position":4},"title":"The First Rule of Climate\u00a0Club","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Climate Club reminds me on the brainwashed Hitler Youth. From Climate Scepticism BY\u00a0JOHN RIDGWAY You do not talk about Climate Club I don\u2019t know why I felt so strongly about this as a child, but learning about the Hitler Youth put me right off the idea of joining any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate activism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate activism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-activism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-12-130936.png?fit=1175%2C659&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301387,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=301387","url_meta":{"origin":279238,"position":5},"title":"The Tip of the\u00a0Iceberg","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In September last year, John Ridgway published here at Cliscep a piece titled\u00a0Burn the Witch!, about an article written by climate scientist Patrick T Brown in which he (Dr Brown) suggested \u201cthat journals such as Nature and Science were biased towards articles that are focussed upon a particular narrative.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate\u00a0Science\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate\u00a0Science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-science-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/01_LaLO33fk1d-WYMPCs8MgvQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C555&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/01_LaLO33fk1d-WYMPCs8MgvQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C555&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/01_LaLO33fk1d-WYMPCs8MgvQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C555&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/01_LaLO33fk1d-WYMPCs8MgvQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C555&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/01_LaLO33fk1d-WYMPCs8MgvQ.jpg?fit=1200%2C555&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=279238"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":279244,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/279238\/revisions\/279244"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/279241"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=279238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=279238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=279238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}