{"id":278041,"date":"2023-09-09T20:37:41","date_gmt":"2023-09-09T18:37:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278041"},"modified":"2023-09-09T20:37:44","modified_gmt":"2023-09-09T18:37:44","slug":"the-great-climate-change-science-bottleneck-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=278041","title":{"rendered":"The Great Climate Change Science Bottleneck"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jessica Weinkle\u2019s Substack, Conflicted<\/strong><\/em> has an informative article on the concentration of influence among a few individuals in climate science and policy.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Power Dynamics of Climate Change Research<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the realm of climate change science, it appears that a select few wield significant power. As highlighted in Jessica Weinkle\u2019s article,<\/a> there\u2019s a concentrated influence in the hands of a handful of individuals. These individuals not only shape the narrative but also control the trajectory of global climate change research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIn a video of an April IPCC scenario workshop, a panel discussion argued that the IPCC does not have any scenarios it merely assess scenarios. Professor Tejal Kanitkar called it out as nonsense in practice. There are too many (i.e. a powerful few) who design, select, and prioritize scenarios while also being influential authors of IPCC reports.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Bottleneck in Global Climate Change Research<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The symbolic power of the IPCC seems to be exacerbating a significant bottleneck in global climate change research. This bottleneck is further intensified by the organization of careers and research trajectories around the development of assessment reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cGlobal climate change research suffers from a rather significant bottleneck and the symbolic power of the IPCC exacerbates the issue by organizing careers and research trajectories around the development of assessment reports.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Role of ScenarioMIP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ScenarioMIP, or the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project, plays a pivotal role in the selection and prioritization of scenarios used in climate change science. Its influence is so profound that it\u2019s challenging to overstate its importance in shaping our understanding of climate and climate policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIn its selection and prioritization of scenarios, ScenarioMIP has profound implications for climate research and policy. It is hard to overstate how important the work of this small group is for how we ultimately think about climate and climate policy.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The CMIP Influence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) stands as a global bottleneck for climate change projections. Its influence is so vast that it\u2019s described as one of the foundational elements of climate science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBy coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current, and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The IAMC and Its Growing Interdependency with the IPCC<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium (IAMC) was created in response to an IPCC call in 2007. Its role? To lead the IAM community in the development of new scenarios used by climate modelers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThe Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium (IAMC) was created in response to an IPCC call in 2007 for a research organization to lead the IAM community in the development of new scenarios used by climate modelers.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Concentration of Power<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the most striking revelations from the article is the overlap of individuals involved in various committees related to climate change research. This overlap suggests a concentration of power in the hands of a few.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIt\u2019s the same people over and over again. This is concentrated power; a handful of people that shape the entire world of climate change research.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Need for Structural and Cultural Change<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article concludes with a call for structural and cultural change, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in the decision-making processes related to climate change research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThis is not a problem that is resolved by a systematic pursuit of knowledge developed through a new research program, as Skea suggests. It is a problem that is addressed through structural and cultural change.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s essential to understand the underlying power dynamics that shape the narrative. The article by Jessica Weinkle sheds light on these dynamics, revealing a concentrated influence in the hands of a select few. As with any scientific endeavor, transparency, accountability, and a diversity of voices are crucial for ensuring that the research serves the greater good and not just a select few.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jessica Weinkle\u2019s full article is well worth a read and she runs an excellent substack worth subscribing to.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the realm of climate change science, it appears that a select few wield significant power. As highlighted in Jessica Weinkle\u2019s article, there\u2019s a concentrated influence in the hands of a handful of individuals. These individuals not only shape the narrative but also control the trajectory of global climate change research.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":278046,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818056,691822455,691822453,691822452,691822454],"class_list":{"0":"post-278041","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change","9":"tag-coupled-model-intercomparison-project-cmip","10":"tag-ipcc-scenario-workshop","11":"tag-jessica-weinkle","12":"tag-scenariomip","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-298.png?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1akx","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":366885,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366885","url_meta":{"origin":278041,"position":0},"title":"Conflicts of Interest in Climate Science: A Systemic Blind Spot","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/19\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The study\u2019s findings reveal a disturbing trend: not a single one of the 331 authors analyzed disclosed any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest\u200b. Moreover, the research found that funding from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) was a significant predictor of studies reporting a positive association between climate change and hurricane behavior\u200b.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon taxes\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon taxes","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-taxes"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0coi_pic.jpg?fit=1200%2C713&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0coi_pic.jpg?fit=1200%2C713&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0coi_pic.jpg?fit=1200%2C713&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0coi_pic.jpg?fit=1200%2C713&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0coi_pic.jpg?fit=1200%2C713&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":434217,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=434217","url_meta":{"origin":278041,"position":1},"title":"Climate Science Is Creeping Into Courtrooms","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/26\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The inadequacies of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Fourth Edition) extend far beyond the chapter on climate science you discuss in your editorial \u201cA Judicial Climate Science Scandal\u201d (Review & Outlook, March 14). Another chapter, \u201cHow Science Works,\u201d has earned sharp criticism from Jessica Weinkle, an associate professor of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/A-Turning-Point-for-Litigation-Campaig-SCOTUS-Takes-Up-Boulder-Climate-Lawsuit.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247138,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=247138","url_meta":{"origin":278041,"position":2},"title":"Scientific Has A Serious Conflict-Of-Interest Problem","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Academics can also be investors, right? So no problem? Well, here is the problem.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-280.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-280.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-280.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-280.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-280.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376604,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376604","url_meta":{"origin":278041,"position":3},"title":"The Flawed ICAT Hurricane Loss Dataset: A Call for Scientific Integrity in Climate Research","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/27\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In a compelling study published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (April 2025), Roger Pielke Jr., previously a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder and now a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and professor emeritus, exposes critical flaws in a widely used dataset of U.S.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"ICAT dataset\"","block_context":{"text":"ICAT dataset","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=icat-dataset"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Eye-Of-A-Hurricane-header.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Eye-Of-A-Hurricane-header.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Eye-Of-A-Hurricane-header.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Eye-Of-A-Hurricane-header.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0Eye-Of-A-Hurricane-header.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":421742,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=421742","url_meta":{"origin":278041,"position":4},"title":"Global Tropical Cyclone Landfalls","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/17\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Back in 2012,\u00a0Jessica Weinkle,\u00a0Ryan Maue, and I published the\u00a0first peer-reviewed paper\u00a0presenting a time series of global tropical cyclone landfalls of hurricane strength.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate hype\"","block_context":{"text":"climate hype","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-hype"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0Light_Fades_on_a_Powerful_Hurricane_Melissa_CIRA_2025-10-26.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0Light_Fades_on_a_Powerful_Hurricane_Melissa_CIRA_2025-10-26.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0Light_Fades_on_a_Powerful_Hurricane_Melissa_CIRA_2025-10-26.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0Light_Fades_on_a_Powerful_Hurricane_Melissa_CIRA_2025-10-26.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0Light_Fades_on_a_Powerful_Hurricane_Melissa_CIRA_2025-10-26.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274634,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=274634","url_meta":{"origin":278041,"position":5},"title":"The Great Climate Change Science Bottleneck","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/20\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a\u00a0video of an April IPCC scenario workshop, a panel discussion argued that the IPCC does not have any scenarios it merely assess scenarios. Professor\u00a0Tejal Kanitkar\u00a0called it out as nonsense in practice. There are too many (i.e. a powerful few) who design, select, and prioritize scenarios while also being influential\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Bottleneck.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Bottleneck.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Bottleneck.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Bottleneck.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Bottleneck.jpg?fit=1200%2C628&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=278041"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278041\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":278047,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278041\/revisions\/278047"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/278046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=278041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=278041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=278041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}