{"id":277453,"date":"2023-09-06T12:12:42","date_gmt":"2023-09-06T10:12:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277453"},"modified":"2023-09-06T12:12:45","modified_gmt":"2023-09-06T10:12:45","slug":"u-s-grid-wind-power-free-market-failure-1940-45","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277453","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Grid Wind Power: Free Market Failure (1940-45)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
The 12 kW turbine built by Charles Brush in 1887. Source: Robert W. Righter<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Bradley Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cAn \u2018infant industry\u2019 wind power is not<\/em>.\u201d (Bradley, below)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt congressional hearings in 1951 to provide increased wind-power funding \u2026 Putnam\u2019s blade failure \u2026 played right into the hands of those committed to other forms of electrical production: fossil, atomic or solar.\u201d (Wired<\/em>, below)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The quest to make electricity from wind attracted entrepreneurs well before government mandates and subsidies got involved in the 1970s. As grid power, wind turbines were\u00a0concept-proven in the 1880s<\/a>\u00a0(as were\u00a0solar panels<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Charles Brush’s turbine on the cover of Scientific American, December 1890.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Charles Fritts installed the first solar panels on New York City rooftop in 1884.\u00a0Courtesy of John Perlin<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The article below in\u00a0Wired<\/em>\u00a0(October 19, 2009), \u201cOct. 19, 1941: Electric Turbines Get First Wind<\/a>\u00a0was published with the subtitle: \u201cThe giant turbine in Vermont was the first wind machine to feed the electrical grid. And then, disaster struck.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
1941:<\/strong>\u00a0The Smith-Putnam Wind Turbine feeds AC power to the electric grid, the first wind machine ever to do so.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The description below pertains to the 1.25 MW Grandpa\u2019s Knob wind turbine, which during World War II distributed electricity to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation. \u201cIn the course of five years of experiments, the engineers in charge concluded that the major mechanical problems had been solved and that a unit could be designed to remain safely on line in any wind,\u201d according to the project\u2019s architect Palmer Putman. This led the Federal Power Commission (now FERC) to estimate the potential of domestic wind power in 1945.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read and learn: an \u2018infant industry\u2019 wind power is not<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The\u00a0Wired<\/em>\u00a0account follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The giant turbine in Vermont was the first wind machine to feed the electrical grid. And then, disaster struck. The unprecedented project was built up from nothing, practically conjured, by Palmer Putnam, an MIT-trained geologist with no formal education or experience in wind power\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before this project, windmills had just pumped water for farmers in the boonies, or charged the batteries of rural radios so they could pick up the AM stations that brought news across the lonely, whistling prairies. The people who sold windmills marketed them to ranchers and farmers; their advertisements appeared in magazines like\u00a0American Thresherman<\/em>,\u00a0Farm Power<\/em>,\u00a0Agricultural Technology<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Successful Farming<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The American windmill, as it was called, was simple and Western and rugged. Its shape hardly changed after key 1880s experiments by Thomas Perry resulted in the founding of the Aermotor company, which dominated the industry thereafter. But that\u2019s not the kind of turbine that Putnam had in mind. After looking into the designs of the past, he immediately decided that the economics of scale dictated that he build a wind turbine with 75-foot blades, the largest in the world. It would generate more than a megawatt of power and feed it on to the grid, working in tandem with a hydroelectric plant to even out the intermittency of the wind and the seasonality of water generation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No one had ever pulled off that balancing act before, and most people working in the wind industry were probably too sane to try\u2026. The strange thing is: Putnam succeeded. \u201cVermont\u2019s mountain winds were harnessed last week to generate electricity for its homes and factories,\u201d read the Sept. 8, 1941, issue of\u00a0Time<\/em>, jumping the gun a bit. \u201cSlowly, like the movements of an awakening giant, two stainless-steel vanes \u2014 the size and shape of a bomber\u2019s wings \u2014 began to rotate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The turbine ran through hundreds of hours of testing up to 1943, often pumping power onto the Central Vermont Public Service Corporation\u2019s electrical grid. The project\u2019s engineers were sure that, technically, the machine worked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Smith-Putnam wind turbine stood as a testament to the power of human \u2014 and American \u2014 ingenuity. A decade before, Soviet engineers had built the world\u2019s largest wind turbine, a 100-kilowatt machine. Now the Yanks had constructed their own, 10 times more powerful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Time<\/em>\u00a0concluded its article on the project with a hopeful half-prediction, \u201cNew England ranges may someday rival Holland as a land of windmills.\u201d This was, after all, merely the prototype for whole lines of turbines that would be more resistant to German bombs than a centralized coal plant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unluckily, a bearing broke in 1943, and the war prevented its replacement until 1945. With the war waning, the wind machine got back up and running in the spring of that year. And that\u2019s when disaster struck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At midnight on March 26, 1945, the wind was blowing at a sleepy 5 miles an hour, too slow to make electricity. Harold Perry, a construction foreman, had been working nonstop for the 23 grueling days since the renewable power plant had gone back online after repairs. That night, an elevator carried Perry 100 feet up through the oil-derrick\u2013like tower to the small, armored building that housed the controls for the world\u2019s largest wind machine. Atop the rural Vermont mountaintop known as\u00a0Grandpa\u2019s Knob<\/a>, Perry didn\u2019t know that the grandest wind experiment in the first few millennia of human existence was about to fail\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At exactly 3:10 a.m. on March 26, 1945, after more than 1,100 hours of operation, the Smith-Putnam turbine experienced an epic failure. One of the turbine\u2019s blades broke clean off and went sailing 750 feet through the night. The force of the breaking blade threw Perry off his feet, as the unbalanced machine shook like the bridge of the\u00a0Starship Enterprise<\/em>\u00a0when it\u2019s under attack\u2026. What went wrong is as obvious as a 75-foot blade lying on the ground. The existence and failure of the turbine hurt renewable-energy advocates in political debates, too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At congressional hearings in 1951 to provide increased wind-power funding, one historian notes, \u201c[L]egislators considered Putnam\u2019s blade failure to have proved the whole endeavor a washout.\u201d The machine\u2019s failure played right into the hands of those committed to other forms of electrical production: fossil, atomic or solar\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the turbine wasn\u2019t a failure for the thousands of wind engineers who\u2019ve come after Putnam. \u201cInterest in developing large wind-electric generating systems in the United States was stimulated primarily by one man, Palmer C. Putnam,\u201d a crisis-induced 1973 NASA research report on alternative energy found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026 the S. Morgan Smith Company, which had bankrolled the project, assigned their patents to the public domain and asked Putnam to write a book detailing what happened, so that others could continue the work. They made the wind data they\u2019d gathered from the region public. This turns out to have been immensely helpful to later generations. Without the unique experiment, nothing would have been known about large-scale systems. Less data means more risk \u2014 and risk is expensive in big power-plant projects. By gathering data on what did and didn\u2019t work, Putnam saved time and money for subsequent researchers\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite Putnam\u2019s initial hopes, his turbine was never rebuilt, nor any more on its exact model. Within six months of the catastrophic blade failure, the S. Morgan Smith Company shut down its wind program. They pulled the plug instead of plunking down the additional $300,000 that Putnam needed. The blade was carted off, the turbine torn down. A cellphone tower now adorns Grandpa\u2019s Knob. Only the foundation of the great wind machine remains.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note<\/strong>: For more information on Grandpa\u2019s Knob, see Palmer Putnam, Power from the Wind<\/em> (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1948) and Putnam. Energy for the Future<\/em> (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1953), pp. 188\u2013191, 243\u2013244.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The quest to make electricity from wind attracted entrepreneurs well before government mandates and subsidies got involved in the 1970s. As grid power, wind turbines were\u00a0concept-proven in the 1880s\u00a0(as were\u00a0solar panels).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":277465,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691822358,691818267,691818852],"class_list":{"0":"post-277453","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-federal-power-commission-now-ferc","9":"tag-solar-power","10":"tag-wind-power","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/00Screenshot-2023-09-06-121128.png?fit=835%2C862&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1ab3","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336383,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336383","url_meta":{"origin":277453,"position":0},"title":"Industrial Wind Power: Infant Industry Not","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The idea of a transition to a \u201cnew energy future\u201d is historically incorrect with wind power, grid solar, and battery-driven cars and trucks. All have a history of non-competitiveness with or displacement by fossil fuels. Energy density explains much of why the renewable energy era gave way to a far\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"new energy future\"","block_context":{"text":"new energy future","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=new-energy-future"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0721-F2-1-1920x1280-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0721-F2-1-1920x1280-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0721-F2-1-1920x1280-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0721-F2-1-1920x1280-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0721-F2-1-1920x1280-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332013,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332013","url_meta":{"origin":277453,"position":1},"title":"Industrial Wind Power: A Depleting Resource?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The New York Times article, \u201cAs Solar Power Surges, U.S. Wind Is in Trouble\u201d (June 4, 2024), discussed the problems of wind problems, such as site depletion. But the article has nary a quotation, much less mention, from the legion of critics of the aged, doomed technology for economical, reliable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"grid power\"","block_context":{"text":"grid power","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=grid-power"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/zScreenshot-2023-11-03-111148-1024x611-2.webp?fit=1024%2C611&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/zScreenshot-2023-11-03-111148-1024x611-2.webp?fit=1024%2C611&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/zScreenshot-2023-11-03-111148-1024x611-2.webp?fit=1024%2C611&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/zScreenshot-2023-11-03-111148-1024x611-2.webp?fit=1024%2C611&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330809,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330809","url_meta":{"origin":277453,"position":2},"title":"Offshore Wind \u201cWake Effect\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/06\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The media bias in favor of industrial wind turbines is a sight to behold. Simple reporting of the facts, from costs to environmental tradeoffs, could inform the public and voters to quite possibly eliminate the government gravy train that disadvantages virtually all of us. That is, everyone except for wind\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Energy Transition\"","block_context":{"text":"Energy Transition","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=energy-transition"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0wake_effect.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0wake_effect.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0wake_effect.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0wake_effect.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0wake_effect.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364543,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=364543","url_meta":{"origin":277453,"position":3},"title":"UK Losing Wind Gamble a Warning for World","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On a frigid January morning, the fruit of the U.K.\u2019s overreliance on wind energy was reaped when its contribution to the national grid plummeted to a\u00a0pitiful zero. Solar output, meanwhile, was a paltry 1% of power generation.","rel":"","context":"In \"GridWatch\"","block_context":{"text":"GridWatch","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=gridwatch"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0EU_solar_power.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0EU_solar_power.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0EU_solar_power.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0EU_solar_power.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0EU_solar_power.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337872,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=337872","url_meta":{"origin":277453,"position":4},"title":"On grid stability","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Readers of this site will be more aware than most of the difficulties involved in eliminating greenhouse gas emissions from electricity grids. The policy preference for wind turbines and solar photovoltaic panels renders the objective still more taxing. Those sources\u2019 intermittency is well understood, and is generally regarded as the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"electricity grid\"","block_context":{"text":"electricity grid","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=electricity-grid"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0matthew-henry-yETqkLnhsUI-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0matthew-henry-yETqkLnhsUI-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0matthew-henry-yETqkLnhsUI-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0matthew-henry-yETqkLnhsUI-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0matthew-henry-yETqkLnhsUI-unsplash-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":189906,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=189906","url_meta":{"origin":277453,"position":5},"title":"Woke Wonderland: Joe Biden\u2019s Offshore Wind Power Plans Staggeringly Expensive Fantasy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/03\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the Humpty Dumpty land occupied by wind and solar advocates, the power produced by wind and sun is free and getting cheaper all the time. Solar panels and wind turbines are powering homes and businesses around-the-clock, whatever the weather. The panels and turbines last forever and cost nothing to\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/00flyingpig.png?fit=780%2C538&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/00flyingpig.png?fit=780%2C538&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/00flyingpig.png?fit=780%2C538&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/00flyingpig.png?fit=780%2C538&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=277453"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277453\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":277466,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277453\/revisions\/277466"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/277465"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=277453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=277453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=277453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}