{"id":276941,"date":"2023-09-02T19:04:59","date_gmt":"2023-09-02T17:04:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=276941"},"modified":"2023-09-02T19:05:03","modified_gmt":"2023-09-02T17:05:03","slug":"media-ignores-story-of-unjustified-retraction-of-a-climate-skeptical-paper-due-to-bullying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=276941","title":{"rendered":"Media Ignores Story of Unjustified Retraction of a Climate Skeptical Paper Due to Bullying"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

While many media outlets ran stories this week about a scientific paper suggesting that Penguin chicks in Antarctica are dying by the thousands (despite evidence suggesting they aren\u2019t<\/a>), the mainstream media ignored another story that shows an ugly episode of bullying of a science journal by prominent climate scientists who demanded that a peer-reviewed paper they didn\u2019t like be retracted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paper, A critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>said in its abstract, \u201cIn conclusion on the basis of observational data, the climate crisis that, according to many sources, we are experiencing today, is not evident yet.\u201d This single phrase likely triggered the demands by prominent climate scientists for the paper to be retracted. Yet that claim is true, supported by real world data and numerous conclusions presented in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change\u2019s most recent report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is yet one more in a growing list of shameful episodes in the catalog of climate science calumnies. It features many of the same rogues gallery of climate researchers caught playing fast and loose with data and short-circuiting peer review in the infamous ClimateGate scandal of 2009<\/a>, such as Dr. Michael E. Mann<\/a> and Dr. Stefan Rahmsdorf<\/a> who used their influence to get this paper retracted. Here is the notice from The European Physical Journal Plus<\/em><\/a>, which has officially retracted the paper with this statement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cRetraction Note: A critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Original Article was published on 13 January 2022<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Retraction Note: Eur. Phys J. Plus (2022) 137:112<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article. Concerns were raised regarding the selection of the data, the analysis and the resulting conclusions of the article. The authors were invited to submit an addendum to the article, but post publication review of the concerns with the article and the submitted addendum concluded that the addendum was not suitable for publication and that the conclusions of the article were not supported by available evidence or data provided by the authors. In light of these concerns and based on the outcome of the post publication review, the Editors-in-Chief no longer have confidence in the results and conclusions reported in this article.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors disagree with this retraction.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Mind you the paper had already gone through peer review and the Editors didn\u2019t cite any specific instance of the use of bad data or the drawing of unsupported conclusions, rather, it seems, unwanted attention from large mainstream media organizations and pressure from prominent outside researchers lead to a failure of \u201cconfidence\u201d in the results. When they let \u201cthe science\u201d through the peer review process decide, the paper was approved and published. When climate alarmism raised its ugly head objecting, the paper was retracted. This cowardly decision was the subject of Team Climate Crisis Resorts to Bullying, Again<\/em><\/a> <\/em>published at WUWT ten days ago. At that date, the paper was simply \u201cunder dispute\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, over a year and a half after publication, with over 40 citations, the paper is retracted at the behest of the \u201cClimateGate gang.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The retraction by the relatively small and obscure journal The European Physical Journal Plus<\/em>, and its prominent publisher Springer, shows a core problem in study of climate change: the corruption climate science in the pursuit of a political agenda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Commenting on this instance of apparent cowardice in the face of pressure, Tony Thomas writes in Quadrant-online,\u00a0How Science is Done These Days<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

There\u2019s nothing new about mainstream climate scientists conspiring to bury papers that throw doubt on catastrophic global warming. The Climategate leaks showed co-compiler of the HadCRUT global temperature series Dr Phil Jones emailing Michael \u201cHockey Stick\u201d Mann, July 8, 2004:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI can\u2019t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin [Trenberth, a colleague] and I will keep them out somehow \u2014 even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is<\/em>!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thanks to a science whistle-blower, there\u2019s now documentation of a current exercise as bad as that captured in the Jones-Mann correspondence. This new and horrid saga \u2013 again involving Dr Mann \u2013 sets out to deplatform and destroy a peer-endorsed published paper by four Italian scientists. Their paper in\u00a0European Physical Journal Plus<\/em>\u00a0is titled A critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming and documents that extreme weather and related disasters are not generally increasing, contrary to the catastrophists feeding misinformation to the Guardian\/ABC axis and other compliant media.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Calls for retractions began only after two Australian media outlets\u2019, the Australian<\/em> and Sky News Australia, reports on the study garnered more than 400,000 views and thousands of comments. Leading climate alarm promoters in the form of The Guardian<\/em>, Agence France-Presse, and the Covering Climate Now, a cabal of some 500 media outlets with reach to a 2 billion audience<\/a>, to respond with fury and publicly rake the journal over the coals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Writing on the retraction in his substack article, \u201cThink of the Implications of Publishing<\/a>,\u201d climate researcher, Roger Pielke Jr, Ph.D. said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

To be clear, there is absolutely no allegation of research fraud or misconduct here, just simple disagreement. Instead of countering arguments and evidence via the peer reviewed literature, activist scientists teamed up with activist journalists to pressure a publisher \u2013 Springer Nature, perhaps the world\u2019s most important scientific publisher \u2013 to retract a paper. Sadly, the pressure campaign worked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The abuse of the peer review process documented here is remarkable and stands as a warning that climate science is as deeply politicized as ever with scientists willing to exert influence on the publication process both out in the open and behind the scenes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Prominent climatologist Judith Curry, Ph.D. tweeted<\/a> concerning the controversial retraction, \u201cReprehensible behavior by journal editors in retracting a widely read climate paper (80,000 downloads) over politically inconvenient conclusions. Journal editors asked me to adjudicate, and my findings were in favor of the author.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is good news though, the lead author of the retracted paper, physicist Gianluca Alimonti, from the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Milan, Italy, and one of his co-authors, Luigi Marian, an agrometeorologist, have published a new paper \u201cIs the number of global natural disasters increasing?<\/a>\u201d in the journal Environmental Hazards<\/em>. Their answer? No, they are not increasing. We will wait and see if this paper is targeted by the Climategate Gang as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The media silence on this ugly episode episode of scientific bullying speaks volumes about their preferences for the kinds of facts, scientific scandals, and truths they choose to report \u2013 and ignore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

While many media outlets ran stories this week about a scientific paper suggesting that Penguin chicks in Antarctica are dying by the thousands (despite evidence suggesting\u00a0they aren\u2019t), the mainstream media ignored another story that shows an ugly episode of bullying of a science journal by prominent climate scientists who demanded that a peer-reviewed paper they didn\u2019t like be retracted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":276949,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818056,691818102,691819265,691822130,691818087],"class_list":{"0":"post-276941","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-change","9":"tag-climate-crisis","10":"tag-climategate","11":"tag-dead-penguin-chicks","12":"tag-global-warming","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Climategate10years_scr.webp?fit=1200%2C967&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1a2N","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276233,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=276233","url_meta":{"origin":276941,"position":0},"title":"Media Spews Misinformation About Emperor Penguin\u2019s Breeding Failure","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The recently published paper by Peter Fretwell titled\u00a0Record Low 2022 Antarctic Sea Ice led to\u00a0Catastrophic Breeding Failure of Emperor Penguins, set off a wave of misinformed doomsday articles, as his introduction stated \u201cRecent efforts to predict emperor penguin population trends from forecasts of sea ice loss have painted a bleak\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00penguin-doom.jpg?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00penguin-doom.jpg?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00penguin-doom.jpg?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/00penguin-doom.jpg?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275974,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=275974","url_meta":{"origin":276941,"position":1},"title":"\u201c10k dead penguin chicks\u201d more animal tragedy porn used to advance global warming agenda","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Like the\u00a02017 video\u00a0of the\u00a0National Geographic starving polar bear, the 2022 deaths of emperor penguin deaths promoted last week is emotional blackmail. Both are examples of preposterous fear-mongering pushed by activist scientists and the media for political purposes. Don\u2019t fall for it.","rel":"","context":"In \"Antarctic sea ice\"","block_context":{"text":"Antarctic sea ice","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=antarctic-sea-ice"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1030.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1030.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1030.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-1030.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":398970,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=398970","url_meta":{"origin":276941,"position":2},"title":"Wrong, CBS and Other Media Outlets, Abrupt Antarctic \u201cClimate Shifts\u201d Are Not New or Necessarily Catastrophic","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent CBS News article, \u201cAbrupt Antarctic climate shifts could lead to \u2018catastrophic consequences for generations,\u2019 experts warn,\u201d claims that Antarctica is on the brink of irreversible collapse due to climate change, warning that sea levels could rise by meters and that \u201ccatastrophic consequences for generations\u201d are looming. This is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Antarctica\"","block_context":{"text":"Antarctica","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=antarctica"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQMI_GllZNwtLMfGQo7zTgeWhRPGfyEhY00Cil7Zae_QvPSFs8mS3fIF_S6nrxQmKYfj3rXGKPhyqrfp1G6K1mVhpP-4mzrW1LwFWNKXuOWZ_gl1u0ovFG0pSuifNOBUgJam78rEVVgxYfhlJXoZPZ4eMAst4w-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQMI_GllZNwtLMfGQo7zTgeWhRPGfyEhY00Cil7Zae_QvPSFs8mS3fIF_S6nrxQmKYfj3rXGKPhyqrfp1G6K1mVhpP-4mzrW1LwFWNKXuOWZ_gl1u0ovFG0pSuifNOBUgJam78rEVVgxYfhlJXoZPZ4eMAst4w-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQMI_GllZNwtLMfGQo7zTgeWhRPGfyEhY00Cil7Zae_QvPSFs8mS3fIF_S6nrxQmKYfj3rXGKPhyqrfp1G6K1mVhpP-4mzrW1LwFWNKXuOWZ_gl1u0ovFG0pSuifNOBUgJam78rEVVgxYfhlJXoZPZ4eMAst4w-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQMI_GllZNwtLMfGQo7zTgeWhRPGfyEhY00Cil7Zae_QvPSFs8mS3fIF_S6nrxQmKYfj3rXGKPhyqrfp1G6K1mVhpP-4mzrW1LwFWNKXuOWZ_gl1u0ovFG0pSuifNOBUgJam78rEVVgxYfhlJXoZPZ4eMAst4w-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQMI_GllZNwtLMfGQo7zTgeWhRPGfyEhY00Cil7Zae_QvPSFs8mS3fIF_S6nrxQmKYfj3rXGKPhyqrfp1G6K1mVhpP-4mzrW1LwFWNKXuOWZ_gl1u0ovFG0pSuifNOBUgJam78rEVVgxYfhlJXoZPZ4eMAst4w-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276053,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=276053","url_meta":{"origin":276941,"position":3},"title":"The Emperor\u2019s New\u00a0Tuxedo","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Great news guys! We\u2019ve discovered five new emperor colonies! Oh no, four of them had total breeding failure in 2022! If only we hadn\u2019t found them with our shiny new satellite we wouldn\u2019t be so depressed now! Ignorance is bliss.","rel":"","context":"In \"Antarctic warming\"","block_context":{"text":"Antarctic warming","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=antarctic-warming"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Penguin_6-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C804&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Penguin_6-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C804&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Penguin_6-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C804&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Penguin_6-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C804&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0Penguin_6-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C804&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369453,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=369453","url_meta":{"origin":276941,"position":4},"title":"Penguins want climate change too (they want Antarctica to be warm like it was 1,000 years ago)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Who knew? Penguins are not only a \u201csentinel species\u201d warning us about climate change in Antarctica but \u201cAd\u00e9lie penguin breeding is closely linked to temperature \u201c. More warming equals more penguins.","rel":"","context":"In \"Ad\u00e9lie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae)\"","block_context":{"text":"Ad\u00e9lie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=adelie-penguin-pygoscelis-adeliae"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0149267744-56a008755f9b58eba4ae8f46.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0149267744-56a008755f9b58eba4ae8f46.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0149267744-56a008755f9b58eba4ae8f46.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0149267744-56a008755f9b58eba4ae8f46.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0149267744-56a008755f9b58eba4ae8f46.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275901,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=275901","url_meta":{"origin":276941,"position":5},"title":"The Climategate Gang Rides Again!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The \u00a0renewed and reinforced Climategate Gang has risen once more, bullying Springer Nature Publishing into retracting a \u00a0peer-reviewed paper by colluding with the climate crisis news cabal, featuring The\u00a0Guardian, AFP, and the UK\u2019s\u00a0Sky News.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0p07gj6xz-1024x576-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0p07gj6xz-1024x576-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0p07gj6xz-1024x576-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0p07gj6xz-1024x576-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=276941"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":276951,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276941\/revisions\/276951"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/276949"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=276941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=276941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=276941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}