{"id":274506,"date":"2023-08-19T16:35:34","date_gmt":"2023-08-19T14:35:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=274506"},"modified":"2023-08-19T16:35:37","modified_gmt":"2023-08-19T14:35:37","slug":"what-has-happened-to-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=274506","title":{"rendered":"What Has Happened to the\u00a0Guardian?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"723\" data-attachment-id=\"274517\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=274517\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1024,1024\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"OIG-59\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?fit=723%2C723&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=723%2C723&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-274517\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?w=1024&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=768%2C768&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=800%2C800&amp;ssl=1 800w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=400%2C400&amp;ssl=1 400w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=200%2C200&amp;ssl=1 200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=450%2C450&amp;ssl=1 450w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=60%2C60&amp;ssl=1 60w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?resize=550%2C550&amp;ssl=1 550w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"http:\/\/cliscep.com\/\">Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>By\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cliscep.com\/author\/johnridgway4\/\">JOHN RIDGWAY<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>And is it still fit for purpose?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8211; Thomas Jefferson<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What is the purpose of journalism?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The cynic might answer that it is to sell newspapers, but in their book,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/The-Elements-Journalism-Newspeople-Completely\/dp\/0307346706\">The Elements of Journalism<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bill_Kovach\">Bill Kovach<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tom_Rosenstiel\">Tom Rosenstiel<\/a>\u00a0offer a better answer. Journalism, they say, \u201ci<em>s not defined by technology, nor by journalists or the techniques they employ.<\/em>\u201d Rather, \u201c<em>the principles and purpose of journalism are defined by something more basic: the function news plays in the lives of people.<\/em>\u201d The bottom line is that journalism exists to provide citizens with the information they need to make the best possible decisions. And, as with all aspects of decision-making, the veracity, impartiality and pertinence of the information provided is critical to the quality of the decisions made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I\u2019m sure that back in 1821, when the current-day Guardian first appeared in the guise of The Manchester Guardian, its founding fathers had such high ideals in mind. The clue is in the name, since \u2018Guardian\u2019 suggests a benevolent intent. And nobody could deny it is a newspaper that has established for itself a strong ideological image. Indeed, the term \u2018Guardian reader\u2019 has become synonymous with the stereotype of the liberal, left-wing and politically correct middle-class. The Guardian exists to inform opinion, but does so from a very particular ideological standpoint. And there is nothing wrong with that, provided that the imperatives of veracity, impartiality and pertinence are met.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To expand upon this point, it is useful for me to first list the elements of journalism that were identified by Kovach and Rosenstiel:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Journalism\u2019s first obligation is to the truth.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Its first loyalty is to citizens.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Its essence is a discipline of verification.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It must serve as an independent monitor of power.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It must provide a forum for public criticism and compromise.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It must strive to make the significant interesting and relevant.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It must keep the news comprehensive and proportional.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Its practitioners must be allowed to exercise their personal conscience.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Citizens, too, have rights and responsibilities when it comes to the news.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So, on the evidence of the deluge of articles currently appearing in the Guardian on the subject of climate change, and their increasingly dogmatic and hysterical tone, how is the Guardian currently standing up when measured against the essential elements of journalism? To answer that question I would like to concentrate upon three recent articles, since I believe they are representative of current standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The people must change<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">My first example is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2023\/aug\/14\/greece-wildfires-climate-crisis-future\">an article<\/a>\u00a0written by\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/author\/show\/3455639.Christy_Lefteri\">Christy Lefteri<\/a>, published on Mon 14 August 2023 under the title: \u2018<em>Even in Greek towns razed by wildfires, people don\u2019t blame the climate crisis. That must change<\/em>\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The phrase \u2018the climate crisis\u2019, used in preference to \u2018climate change\u2019, is in line with the Guardian\u2019s adoption of a new style guide that is purported to be more scientifically accurate. However, \u2018crisis\u2019 is not a scientific term. So this is not an obligation to a scientific truth but an obligation to an editorial position. That position is made very clear in the article\u2019s opening statement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Many see climate breakdown as a problem of the future, but it\u2019s here now. To move forward, we must understand our part in it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once again, \u2018climate breakdown\u2019 is not a scientific term but one that sets a mood favoured by the editorial board. And as for the \u2018here and now\u2019 message, the IPCC has been keen to promote such a perception ever since it outlined its strategy for the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cliscep.com\/2021\/02\/18\/the-ipcc-on-risk-part-1-new-developments\/\">\u2018social amplification of risk\u2019<\/a>\u00a0in AR5, WG3, Chapter 2. So it appears, on this very important point, that the Guardian, whilst no doubt believing itself \u2018loyal to the citizens\u2019, is actually being loyal to the IPCC (where the IPCC\u2019s loyalties lie is quite another question). As for what has happened to the Guardian\u2019s \u2018discipline of verification\u2019, that would have to be anyone\u2019s guess. Has anyone at the Guardian even thought to read AR5, WG3, Chapter 2 to see what the IPCC has been up to? Did anyone on the newspaper\u2019s staff remember their obligation to \u2018serve as an independent monitor of power\u2019 before so eagerly taking up the IPCC narrative? Big Oil isn\u2019t the only power that needs to be challenged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, although the Guardian\u2019s standard editorial position troubles me, there is something peculiar to the Lefteri article that I find unusually distasteful; it\u2019s a chemistry that certainly doesn\u2019t feature in&nbsp;<em>The<\/em><em>Elements of Journalism<\/em>. The article starts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cDuring the summer of 2021, I flew to Greece to learn more about the wildfires there. I wanted to hear people\u2019s stories, to understand what it meant to be displaced by environmental disaster\u2026and I was three months pregnant. Feeling Evie growing inside me made me wonder what kind of world she would live in \u2013 and made me all the more determined to learn as much as I could about what people had experienced.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So we are led to believe here that Christy is just acting like a good journalist and a responsible mother should, keen to learn more from the locals and to give them a voice on the world stage. However, reading between the lines, her true mission was to spread the truth as only a middle-class, London-born, Guardian reader and wannabe psychotherapist could possibly understand it. The locals needed to know where their ire should be directed \u2013 at the oil companies. Unfortunately, it seemed they were having none of it:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cWhat surprised me, however, was that any mention of the bigger issue, of the climate crisis and global heating, was shut down immediately and completely. It was made clear to me that this subject was unacceptable. Survivors felt that these issues had nothing to do with what they had suffered, and that the people actually accountable needed to pay.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So she came back home and wrote an article lambasting those poor, long-suffering survivors for not getting on board with the liberal, left-wing worldview promoted by the Guardian. The title said it all: \u2018<em>That must change<\/em>\u2019. Having one\u2019s opinions informed by direct experience of a catastrophe must change. Seeing wildfires in terms of a complex set of issues involving human acts and omissions that go far beyond the burning of fossil fuel must change. Worrying about a chronic and worsening epidemic of arsonists must change. Complaining about years of neglect regarding forest management must change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Try as I may, I cannot reconcile such arrogance, ignorance and contempt for local opinion with any obligation to the truth or a loyalty to citizenry. As for veracity, impartiality and pertinence, the article deliberately rejects the veracity and partiality of first-hand accounts and is nothing if not impertinent.&nbsp;<em>The Elements of Journalism<\/em>&nbsp;calls for independence of thought, but also warns that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>In our independence, however, journalists must avoid straying into arrogance, elitism, isolation or nihilism.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I am sad to say that, when it comes to reporting upon climate change, the Guardian seems to stray into arrogance and elitism on a daily basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>How facts don\u2019t matter when climate justice is at stake<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For my second example, we stay with extreme weather but cross the world to Pakistan to see how the Guardian reported upon the devastation caused by the 2022 flooding. The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2022\/sep\/05\/rich-countries-pakistan-flooding-climate-crisis-cop27\">article<\/a>\u00a0I have chosen is actually an opinion piece written on Mon 5 Sep 2022 by a former member of the Senate of Pakistan,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mustafa_Nawaz_Khokhar\">Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar<\/a>. It goes by the title, \u2018<em>Rich countries caused Pakistan\u2019s catastrophic flooding. Their response? Inertia and apathy<\/em>\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is not surprising that a Pakistani politician should paint such a black and white picture of climate injustice, and it is equally unsurprising, given its ideological leanings, that the Guardian should allow him to make his case without challenge. However, there comes a point when one would hope that the required elements of journalism would intervene. And that point must surely have arrived when Kohkar was allowed to repeat the easily refutable claim that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&nbsp;One-third of Pakistan is now underwater.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The true figure was 9%. Even so, it may seem immaterial for me to draw attention to this gross exaggeration, given that \u2018more than 1,700 people&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2022_Pakistan_floods\">perished<\/a>&nbsp;in the disaster. But these details do drive the narrative, so their accuracy matters. According to Kovach and Rosenstiel:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Even in a world of expanding voices, \u201cgetting it right\u201d is the foundation upon which everything else is built \u2013 context, interpretation, comment, criticism, analysis and debate.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, perhaps the more serious misdirection isn\u2019t as a result of what the article says but what it fails to say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According, to Khokhar:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>We\u2019re now living through a crisis that wasn\u2019t of our making.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And to illustrate that point he makes a great deal of the impact that climate change is having on what he refers to as the \u2018third pole\u2019, the mountainous region that stretches from Myanmar to Afghanistan. He goes on to explain:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cLittle grows at such high altitude. But the third pole functions as a water reserve whose 10 major rivers flow downstream from these mountains and sustain more than 1.5 billion people. When you understand this, you start to see the mountains, valleys, and continuously flowing streams and rivers in a different light.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes, but what he fails to mention is the role played by the forested foothills and how they are vital in moderating any flooding that may occur in the lower plains as a result of the \u2018flowing streams and rivers\u2019. It is these forests that act as the watershed and it is these forests that have been subjected to massive deforestation over the last 30 years. This environmental catastrophe occurred under the watchful but impotent gaze of the Pakistani government and it was a highly significant contributor to the devastation caused in 2022. As reported&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/archives\/la-xpm-2010-oct-13-la-fg-pakistan-logging-20101013-story.html\">here<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cDeforestation played a tremendous role in aggravating the floods,\u201d said Ghulam Akbar, director of the Pakistan Wetlands Program, an environment protection group funded by the United Nations and other international organizations. \u201cHad there been good forests, as we used to have 25 years back, the impact of flooding would have been much less.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is not a detail that Khokhar wishes to draw to anyone\u2019s attention and it isn\u2019t one that the Guardian sees fit to introduce at any point. There seems to be one narrative played out on the world stage of politics, and another that reflects the reality on the ground. Whilst the Guardian seems to have little regard for local opinion when it contradicts its own understanding, other&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thenewhumanitarian.org\/news-feature\/2022\/09\/05\/Pakistan-floods-urgent-questions-climate-crisis\">news outlets<\/a>&nbsp;seem less dismissive:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201cOur irrigation departments are not in touch with locals, our environmental protection agencies are not in touch with locals, and the Balochistan disaster management authority is currently the most useless institution in the country. And while climate change is important in water policy and government discourse, I think the federal and provincial governments place a lot of blame on climate change and use it as a scapegoat for their own incompetence.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To be fit for purpose, a newspaper \u2018must serve as an independent monitor of power\u2019. Clearly, this article fails to provide any independent challenge. It allows a politician to press his case for reparation without attempting to test the strength of his argument. The Guardian colludes on this occasion because Khokhar is professing a climate injustice that the Guardian itself believes in. However, in so doing, the Guardian also betrays its obligation to truth and denies a voice to the citizens to which its primary loyalty should lie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Forums for debate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For my final example I go back further in time to see how the Guardian has reported upon the thorny subject of online climate change \u2018misinformation\u2019. Having just demonstrated how the Guardian is no stranger to such artifice, you may find the following somewhat ironic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2022\/dec\/02\/climate-change-denialism-flooding-twitter-scientists\">article<\/a>&nbsp;concerned was written by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/olivermilman.com\/\">Oliver Milman<\/a>&nbsp;on Fri 2 Dec 2022, and is titled,&nbsp;<em>\u2018#ClimateScam: denialism claims flooding Twitter have scientists worried<\/em>\u2019. It leads with the message that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Many researchers are fleeing the platform, unnerved by the surge in climate misinformation since Musk\u2019s chaotic takeover.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes, according to Oliver, scientists are abandoning in droves the platform formerly known as Twitter, due to Elon Musk\u2019s takeover and his insistence that the platform should be dedicated to free speech. Apparently, the subsequent relaxation of moderation has had a profound and disturbing effect:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Scientists and advocates have told the Guardian they have become unnerved by a recent resurgence of debunked climate change denialist talking points and memes on Twitter, with the term #ClimateScam now regularly the first result that appears when \u201cclimate\u201d is searched on the site.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To evidence the claim, Oliver calls upon the testimony of that&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/larrybell\/2011\/06\/28\/michael-mann-and-the-climategate-whitewash-part-one\/?sh=20c4d755449a\">paragon of trustworthiness<\/a>, Michael Mann:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Michael Mann, a prominent climate scientist at University of Pennsylvania, said he has no immediate plans to depart Twitter but he\u2019s noticed that climate disinformation has \u201cbecome a bit more on the nose, with climate deniers who had been deactivated making a reappearance, and climate denial getting somewhat more traction\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And if that were not enough to settle the issue, Jennie King of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue was summoned to the stand:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>King said there was a \u201crenewed energy\u201d coursing through the effort to spread baseless claims about the climate crisis on Twitter, particularly by high-profile accounts that fold the issue into other major clashes, such as over abortion or LGBTQ+ rights.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Claims of a resurgence may be true, but what about the headline regarding #ClimateScam? Remember that scientists were \u2018unnerved\u2019 that it was regularly the first result that appears when \u2018climate\u2019 is searched for. That surely is the smoking gun that tells you that, on Elon\u2019s watch, climate denial has taken over Twitter. Well, no, not actually. According to Jennie King:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>There\u2019s no evidence there are more posts with \u2018climate scam\u2019 than \u2018climate emergency\u2019 or other terms, or that they are getting more engagement, so it\u2019s a bit perplexing why it\u2019s the top search term, we are scratching our heads at it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Despite the headline, it turns out that the problem is not one of a new era of dominance caused by Elon letting the hordes of climate deniers back online, it is a problem with the algorithm that promotes search items, and the lack of transparency for that algorithm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once again, upon reading the report in full, I come away with a distinct impression that the Guardian had attempted to misdirect me. And this misdirection is important because it speaks to the narrative of a peril within, a peril taking the form of misinformation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>While false claims about the climate crisis have been deployed for decades by the fossil fuel industry and various conservative figures, there is some evidence there has been a rise in polarization over climate on social media over the past two years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And what might those false claims be?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>..claims such as that people favoring climate action are somehow hypocrites or that reducing emissions is pointless or expensive\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is indeed a debate to be had over such issues. And, as pointed out in\u00a0<em>The Elements of Journalism<\/em>, newspapers \u2018must provide a forum for public criticism and compromise\u2019. How the Guardian thinks it is providing such a vital service by demonising one side of the debate and portraying it as if it were an infection driving away all the good folk from social media is something I need explaining to me. It could be argued that the posited online resurgence of views, abhorred by Guardian readers, may be because platforms like Twitter succeed in providing the required forum, whereas newspapers such as the Guardian signally fail to do so. In this very important respect, the Guardian is most certainly not fit for purpose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Trust me, I\u2019m a journalist<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Back in 2020, the Guardian was\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/media\/2020\/aug\/13\/the-guardian-is-most-trusted-by-its-readers-among-uk-newspapers-finds-ofcom\">boasting<\/a>\u00a0that a survey conducted by Ofcom found it to be \u2018the most trusted by its readers among UK newspapers\u2019. Such results are very important because they indicate the extent to which a public is prepared to use a newspaper for its primary purpose \u2013 to inform its decision-making. However, trusted is not the same as trustworthy, and in that reality gap can be found the seeds of misfortune. As Kovach and Rosenstiel said, \u2018getting it right is the foundation upon which everything else is built\u2019, and far too often the Guardian can be found getting it wrong \u2013 often tendentiously so. To add to this, it is often apparent that, as a newspaper, it is too loyal to its ideology, to the detriment of failing to encourage open debate on matters of public interest. Its tone can be shrill and dismissive, to the extent that it exudes arrogance and condescension.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The fact that the Guardian is considered a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Newspaper_of_record\">newspaper of record<\/a>\u00a0merely accentuates how important it is that it should adhere to the elements of journalism outlined by Kovach and Rosenstiel. Unless it fulfils its obligation to the truth, treats its loyalty to the citizens above all others, maintains a discipline of verification, serves as an independent monitor of power, and provides a forum for public criticism and compromise, it cannot lay claim to being fit for purpose. When it comes to climate change and a proposed accelerated transition to Net Zero, the public are faced with decisions carrying enormous importance. Perhaps more than at any point in recent history the public needs access to reliable information. The internet won\u2019t always provide that, but that doesn\u2019t mean that the Guardian does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers<\/p>\n<p>Thomas Jefferson<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":274517,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821946,691818056,691818102,691821642,691818154,691818262],"class_list":["post-274506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-2022-flooding","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-crisis","tag-ipcc-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change","tag-net-zero","tag-the-guardian","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/OIG-59.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-19pw","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254502,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=254502","url_meta":{"origin":274506,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Weird Weather\u2019 and Our Ignorance of Earth\u2019s Climate History","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"When someone tells me, \u201cBoy, the weather sure has been weird in recent years,\u201d I am pretty confident of two things: \u00a0one, they have bought into the climate change hoax, and two, they know absolutely nothing about history. \u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"Al Gore\"","block_context":{"text":"Al Gore","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=al-gore"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00-thundercloud-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00-thundercloud-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00-thundercloud-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00-thundercloud-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00-thundercloud-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257989,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=257989","url_meta":{"origin":274506,"position":1},"title":"Scientists Pushing Net Zero Complain of Hurty Feelings on Twitter","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/18\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"There has been another sighting of the regular complaint that climate scientists are being subject to hurty comments on Twitter. The\u00a0Guardian\u00a0reports a \u201chuge\u201d rise\u00a0in abuse since Elon Musk took over the platform last year.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate deniers\"","block_context":{"text":"climate deniers","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-deniers"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00tweetrvlsoft.jpg?fit=1200%2C417&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00tweetrvlsoft.jpg?fit=1200%2C417&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00tweetrvlsoft.jpg?fit=1200%2C417&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00tweetrvlsoft.jpg?fit=1200%2C417&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00tweetrvlsoft.jpg?fit=1200%2C417&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260340,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=260340","url_meta":{"origin":274506,"position":2},"title":"Climate and Energy Potpourri","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This week\u2019s Climate Change Roundtable, Climate and Energy Potpourri is a show about nothing and everything.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-03-130028.png?fit=896%2C505&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-03-130028.png?fit=896%2C505&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-03-130028.png?fit=896%2C505&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-03-130028.png?fit=896%2C505&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280170,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280170","url_meta":{"origin":274506,"position":3},"title":"\u201cA Cleverly Staged Hoax.\u201d \u2026Former German TV Meteorologist Slams \u201cClimate Hysteria\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/24\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While the system media conjure up the allegedly impending climate catastrophe from morning to night, Austrian alternative media\u00a0AUF1 reveals the system\u00a0behind the propaganda.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate change propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate change propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Scared-Climate-Change.jpg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Scared-Climate-Change.jpg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Scared-Climate-Change.jpg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Scared-Climate-Change.jpg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238350,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=238350","url_meta":{"origin":274506,"position":4},"title":"Shifting Sands","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s a\u00a0lottery","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0.webp?fit=1200%2C782&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263622,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263622","url_meta":{"origin":274506,"position":5},"title":"In Search of the \u201cGreenhouse Signal\u201d in the 1990s (and when did they know?)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/24\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"When did the \u201cgreenhouse signal\u201d become recognized and \u201csettled science\u201d? Despite the 35th anniversary of James Hansen\u2019s June 1988 testimony to a Senate subcommittee, the historical record should be clear that detection was not in 1988. Or 1991. Or 1995. Or 1998.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0dontpanic3.webp?fit=1200%2C848&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0dontpanic3.webp?fit=1200%2C848&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0dontpanic3.webp?fit=1200%2C848&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0dontpanic3.webp?fit=1200%2C848&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0dontpanic3.webp?fit=1200%2C848&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=274506"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":274519,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274506\/revisions\/274519"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/274517"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=274506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=274506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=274506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}