{"id":269792,"date":"2023-07-27T21:27:03","date_gmt":"2023-07-27T19:27:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=269792"},"modified":"2023-07-27T21:27:06","modified_gmt":"2023-07-27T19:27:06","slug":"meteorology-needs-to-search-its-soul-one-lover-of-weather-at-a-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=269792","title":{"rendered":"Meteorology needs to search its soul, one lover of weather at a time"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Joe Bastardi<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Bob Dylan is right. You are going to serve someone. But it is your choice. Do you serve what you have gratitude for, or to an idea that you are being asked to accept and not question?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On a clear, calm winter night, have you noticed how low the temperature gets?\u00a0 With no clouds in the sky, the lower levels cool, so it gets cold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the same kind of calm night with clouds, what happens? It does not get as cold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why not? Clouds prevent the processes allowing the lower levels to cool. In fact, a fun game to play if you have clouds under 3k feet is to estimate the temperature at the base of the cloud. (It\u2019s fun to me because I am a complete nerd.) If it is cloudy with no wind, it\u2019s usually pretty close to the temperature at the base of the cloud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now what about a sunny summer day with no wind? Gets hot, right? What if it is cloudy? It is not as hot.\u00a0 Why would it be cloudy? More water vapor without an increase in temperatures in the levels where clouds form.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So in the summer, more water vapor where it is quite hot normally leads to a decrease in MAX\u00a0 temperatures. In the cold season, the opposite is true, especially in minimum temperatures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Look at the max temps for the last ten years in August. High temperatures over the places with the highest \u201cheat indexes\u201d have been lowering!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Here is 1952-1954<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

So water vapor tends to even out temperatures when there are increases. Warmer areas will have lower temperatures at the warmest times of the year, and colder areas have higher temperatures at the coldest time of the year. That should be intuitive to a meteorologist and climatologist, given saturation mixing ratios. The fact that it rains more means once away from the boundary layers, in precipitation-producing levels, the rate of increase of temperature is not enough to limit the condensation rates, another hint as to how limited CO2 has to be. We have no such relationships for CO2!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

http:\/\/www.atmo.arizona.edu\/students\/courselinks\/fall12\/atmo336\/lectures\/sec1\/Saturation_Mixing_Ratio_Tables.htm<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

You can see very tiny increases where it\u2019s extremely cold, which correlates to a lot of warming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now watch this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before the super nino 2015<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Notice that temps in the arctic areas since then show that every year is at or below average at the height of the warmest time of the year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2016<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2018<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

current<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

EVERY SUMMER!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What have arctic winters done?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

They have obviously warmed. The increase in Water Vapor (WV) leads to more clouds when it\u2019s very cold, thus causing warming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Data scream it loudly: There is no summer warming while winters are warmer, and this being factored into global temperatures is skewing the temperatures. The Antarctic winter has similar responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

I agree with my CAGW antagonists that the Arctic is the \u201ccanary in the coal mine\u201d. Unfortunately, it is not singing their tune. And the antics of the ocean are exposing them. Look at that winter warming. Now look at geothermal spreading and the increase in SSTs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Again because it has to be noted and noted and noted again.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

It is not an accident. It\u2019s not something that should be ignored. Doing so is using Hunter Biden\u2019s Laptop Science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So how can you possibly ignore this unless the same kind of deception, distortion, and delusion that we see in other matters, has invaded science?\u00a0 The bulk of the warming is in the coldest, driest areas in their winter seasons. Not only does the lack of warming in the summer when the average temperature is barely above 32 trash the ice melt theory (you can say it won\u2019t increase as much in the winter, but it is limited in its summer melting if it is not getting warm), but it points the finger at WV ( as it should be) not CO2. What is warming the oceans? How one does not look at the geothermal spreading and not see it LEADS\u00a0 the warming is beyond me. Or ignores it. If it\u2019s ignored, it is only because it would question the whole man-made warming message. This would question the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agenda and expose it for what it is and what many skeptics believe. The warming is mainly, if not exclusively, natural, and man has very little to do with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Again its linkage linkage linkage!!!\u00a0 Distort temp patterns, and you distort vertical velocities.\u00a0 \u00a0More warming in the north overall leads to less convergence relative to averages over the tropics. This leads to more incoming solar radiation, and hence more outgoing Long wave radiation; it adds to oceanic warming, which in turn continues to propel the temperature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please see this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.cfact.org\/2023\/07\/14\/the-temperature-may-prove-it-is-not-co2\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am NOT out to save the world, my country, or whatever.\u00a0 I have decided I can not be anyone\u2019s hero, but I can do what God made me to do. If that involves questioning, then so be it; as Proverbs 25:2 says, its the glory of God to conceal a matter, to search it out the glory of kings.\u00a0 As far as my country, the lame response of people in power in this matter who are asleep at the switch as the left pushed this to b brink, leaves them without an excuse. They simply did not care or kept quoting small percentages of people that believed it. Oblivious to history that small bands of zealots turned nations into despotic regimes, or that small percentages can tip elections. So I can not change that, but I can speak up so people perhaps wake up. What I do not understand is how a meteorologist or climatologist can look at this and simply dismiss it out of hand. My gosh, do you realize CO2 NEEDS WARMING TO CAUSE WARMING? It does not initiate it. It is not a heat-trapping gas, but radiative considerations depending on OUTGOING, NOT INCOMING, LONG WAVE RADIATION, lead to the idea it can warm the planet. The argument should be over attribution levels. It\u2019s not my way or the highway. But think. THE SAME REASONING YOU USE FOR CO2, IT IS INCREASING, SO IT IS WARMING, MUST BE APPLIED TO GEOTHERMAL. The problem is for one that physically, it is far more likely to result in changes in input that result in what you are seeing, and for another, it is the DRIVER of any CO2-induced warming.\u00a0 Big PRIMARY\u00a0 drivers, not secondary reactionary features, are needed to warm the oceans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I keep pushing this because we have to wake up for the sake of the souls of meteorology and climatology.\u00a0 If we find after soul searching, and I mean questioning authority with an open mind, it\u2019s still man-made, fine. But when you simply do as you are told and do not question anything, who are you selling your soul to? People who do not share your love, but look at our field as something to simply push their agenda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saving the planet should not be your goal. Finding the answer to what the atmosphere is asking you should be. That is what a forecast is, answering the question, no matter where it takes you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Think about years from now. If you looked and questioned, you have done what anyone that would defend something they love would do. If not, then what the Apostle Paul said comes to mind, like so many things we are finding out: \u201cThose who know what they know don\u2019t yet know what they ought to know.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will quote Gen\u00a0 Lewis Armistead at Gettysburg, \u201cif you do not look at all there is, what will you think of yourself tomorrow?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Author<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n


Joe Bastardi<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joe Bastardi is a pioneer in extreme weather and long-range forecasting. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He is the author of \u201cThe Climate Chronicles: Inconvenient Revelations You Won\u2019t Hear From Al Gore \u2014 and Others\u201d which you can purchase at the CFACT bookstore. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

His new book The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate war can be found here. phonyclimatewar.com<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Saving the planet should not be your goal. Finding the answer to what the atmosphere is asking you should be. That is what a forecast is, answering the question, no matter where it takes you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":269825,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818432,691818076,691818229,691821393],"class_list":{"0":"post-269792","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-clouds","9":"tag-co2","10":"tag-esg","11":"tag-meteorology","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-838.png?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-18bu","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335638,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=335638","url_meta":{"origin":269792,"position":0},"title":"10 Questions Climate Doomers Can’t or Won’t Answer- The Climate Realism Show\u00a0#117","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"We will go over the Crazy Climate News of the Week. Tune in LIVE for the stream at 1 p.m. ET (noon CT) to watch the show and leave your own questions in the chat with host Anthony Watts, along with panelists H. Sterling Burnett and Linnea Lueken.","rel":"","context":"In \"Benny Peiser\"","block_context":{"text":"Benny Peiser","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=benny-peiser"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-05-185259.png?fit=1200%2C667&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-05-185259.png?fit=1200%2C667&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-05-185259.png?fit=1200%2C667&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-05-185259.png?fit=1200%2C667&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/00Screenshot-2024-07-05-185259.png?fit=1200%2C667&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377982,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=377982","url_meta":{"origin":269792,"position":1},"title":"NOAA’s Forecast Model Has A Drop Out Problem","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/05\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Many weather scientists have noted that NOAA's global weather prediction model, the GFS, is now in fourth place, behind the European Center, the UK Meteorology Office, and the Canadians.\u00a0 \u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"European model\"","block_context":{"text":"European model","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=european-model"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0xyakAi0.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0xyakAi0.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0xyakAi0.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0xyakAi0.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/0xyakAi0.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372534,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=372534","url_meta":{"origin":269792,"position":2},"title":"Climate Central\u2019s Urban Rainfall Claims Are All Wet","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In its March 26, 2025, article titled \u201cHeavier Rainfall Rates in U.S. Cities,\u201d Climate Central (CC) claims that \u201cClimate change is supercharging the water cycle, bringing heavier rainfall extremes and related flood risks across the U.S.\u201d This conclusion is misleading at best, and scientifically irresponsible at worst. The evidence, when\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Central (CC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Central (CC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-central-cc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/063_1590113874.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/063_1590113874.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/063_1590113874.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/063_1590113874.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/063_1590113874.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":406238,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406238","url_meta":{"origin":269792,"position":3},"title":"Media and the German climate expert","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"We had informed about this very strange interview in \"heute\" from ZDF. Dunja Hayali got a \"confirmation\" for a rather \"far-fetched\" thesis of the German Meteorological Society: We could reach global warming of 3\u00b0C above pre-industrial temperature levels as early as 2050.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQMilZXmoRMTguPwGjDNDAdoYKb-o1WEH3XEKiOxrZan_5KJzZYkbFA_7pyf7flVITfviJiKgF3NoOza04d8IrmmSsSSa7LED-ew632Gw487UqGMpV09yeF8F-2y6MP0nVc0-EDFABboOg5RpMlsCO4_yTUBXw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQMilZXmoRMTguPwGjDNDAdoYKb-o1WEH3XEKiOxrZan_5KJzZYkbFA_7pyf7flVITfviJiKgF3NoOza04d8IrmmSsSSa7LED-ew632Gw487UqGMpV09yeF8F-2y6MP0nVc0-EDFABboOg5RpMlsCO4_yTUBXw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQMilZXmoRMTguPwGjDNDAdoYKb-o1WEH3XEKiOxrZan_5KJzZYkbFA_7pyf7flVITfviJiKgF3NoOza04d8IrmmSsSSa7LED-ew632Gw487UqGMpV09yeF8F-2y6MP0nVc0-EDFABboOg5RpMlsCO4_yTUBXw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQMilZXmoRMTguPwGjDNDAdoYKb-o1WEH3XEKiOxrZan_5KJzZYkbFA_7pyf7flVITfviJiKgF3NoOza04d8IrmmSsSSa7LED-ew632Gw487UqGMpV09yeF8F-2y6MP0nVc0-EDFABboOg5RpMlsCO4_yTUBXw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQMilZXmoRMTguPwGjDNDAdoYKb-o1WEH3XEKiOxrZan_5KJzZYkbFA_7pyf7flVITfviJiKgF3NoOza04d8IrmmSsSSa7LED-ew632Gw487UqGMpV09yeF8F-2y6MP0nVc0-EDFABboOg5RpMlsCO4_yTUBXw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":384605,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=384605","url_meta":{"origin":269792,"position":4},"title":"Climatologist Judith Curry on the politicization of climate science","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cYour funding, salary increase, and tenure case are tied to agreeing with the \u2018consensus.\u2019 It\u2019s really about careerism and resources. They all have to dance to that same drumbeat to get professional recognition and professional advancement,\u201d says Dr. Judith Curry, professor emeritus at the Georgia Institute of Technology, describing the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate science\"","block_context":{"text":"climate science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Judith-Curry-Interview.jpg?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Judith-Curry-Interview.jpg?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Judith-Curry-Interview.jpg?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Judith-Curry-Interview.jpg?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Judith-Curry-Interview.jpg?fit=1200%2C806&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225371,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=225371","url_meta":{"origin":269792,"position":5},"title":"Potsdam Climate Institute Scientists Criticized: \u201cScouring for Most Alarmist Stories\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Climate researcher Bj\u00f6rn Stevens, director of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Meteorology in Hamburg, criticizes his Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) colleagues, calling them \u201calarmist\u201d","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00new_york_apocalypse_ruins_building_25376_1920x1080.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00new_york_apocalypse_ruins_building_25376_1920x1080.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00new_york_apocalypse_ruins_building_25376_1920x1080.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00new_york_apocalypse_ruins_building_25376_1920x1080.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00new_york_apocalypse_ruins_building_25376_1920x1080.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=269792"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":269826,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269792\/revisions\/269826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/269825"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=269792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=269792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=269792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}