{"id":268261,"date":"2023-07-19T11:48:51","date_gmt":"2023-07-19T09:48:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268261"},"modified":"2023-07-19T11:48:54","modified_gmt":"2023-07-19T09:48:54","slug":"could-federal-courts-roll-back-climate-regulatory-overreach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268261","title":{"rendered":"Could Federal courts roll back climate regulatory overreach?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Collister Johnson<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has recently decided two cases which indicate that federal district courts are prepared to roll back the relentless onslaught of regulatory overreach advanced by the Biden Administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, meaningful judicial oversight of the regulatory deep state bureaucracy has been stymied by a legal doctrine known as \u201cChevron Deference\u201d, named after the 1984 Supreme Court case,\u00a0Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council,\u00a0<\/em>which held that courts should defer to bureaucratic \u201cexpertise\u201d when deciding cases where the underlying law and facts are ambiguous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In\u00a0American Public Gas Association v. US Department of Energy,\u00a0<\/em>decided July 7, 2023, the District Court specifically rejected Chevron Deference in a case involving DOE\u2019s regulation of the commercial gas boiler market, and ruled that the DOE failed to provide \u201cclear and convincing\u201d evidentiary support for a rule that would have upended that market in the name of energy efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similarly, in\u00a0Maine Lobstermen\u2019s Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service,\u00a0<\/em>decided June 16, 2023, the same court specifically declined to adopt \u201caggressive Chevron deference\u201d and ruled that NMFS\u00a0misapplied the Endangered Species Act when it passed a rule which would have effectively shuttered the lobster fishing industry in the name of saving the endangered North Atlantic Right Whale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both decisions required the Court to dig deep into the weeds of the market mechanics underlying two private sector markets \u2013 lobster fishing and commercial gas boiler manufacturing \u2013 in order to conclude that the bureaucrats of DOE and NMFS did not interpret facts properly in applying the underlying law. The intricacies and details of these markets are not commonly known and required detailed investigation. In the case of gas boilers, the Court was not afraid to devote pages of its opinion to the intricacies of \u201cMonte Carlo simulation and the probability distributions\u201d of DOE\u2019s market demand models. Similarly, in the lobstermen case, the Court took pains to research the history of the Right Whale as a species and undertake a detailed investigation into its relationship to the NMFS rule regarding lobster fishing equipment, which would purportedly reduce Right Whale deaths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This rejection of Chevron Deference will be critically important in upcoming cases where the plaintiffs will be seeking to have the courts employ the Endangered Species Act to halt offshore wind development. The ESA requires the government to \u201censure\u201d that the leasing of offshore federal waters is \u201cnot likely to jeopardize the continued existence\u201d of a protected species \u2013 in this case the critically endangered North Atlantic Right Whale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The huge Virginia offshore wind project is a case in point. In the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for that project, NOAA has admitted that \u201cit is not possible to predict with certainty the potential long term behavioral effects on marine mammals of the project-related pile-driving or other activities [vessel movements, vessel noise, high resolution geophysical surveys, geotechnical drilling, dredging activity, and operational noise]\u201d. \u201cThe exact level and extent of impacts on the North Atlantic Right Whale is impossible to predict with certainty\u201d. In other words, the answer of NMFS to the question of whether the Virginia offshore wind project will jeopardize the continued existence of the Right Whale as a species is:\u00a0We don\u2019t know.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Based on the\u00a0Lobstermen\u2019s\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0American Public Gas Association\u00a0<\/em>cases, that defense, while forthright and accurate, would be met by the DC Circuit (and other federal courts which follow its lead) with a resounding rejection. The \u201cwe don\u2019t know\u201d defense not only fails to meet the \u201cclear and convincing\u201d standard, it doesn\u2019t come close to meeting the \u201cnot likely\u201d to jeopardize standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So from a legal standpoint, a case brought in the DC circuit by a plaintiff against NMFS, based on the ESA, challenging the Virginia (or other East Coast) wind projects would have these two powerful precedents to rely on, and the government would be burdened with an admission that it lacks critical facts to support any decision approving the project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is ample room for hope that the federal courts will at least slow down, if not halt, the insane rush to destabilize the US electricity grid in the name of resolving \u201cclimate change\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Author<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n


Collister Johnson<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson has spent the last four decades working in the public and private sectors in Virginia, primarily in the fields of project finance and maritime transportation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He began his career in public service as Chairman of the Board of the Virginia Port Authority. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He was appointed by President George W. Bush, and confirmed by the Senate, as a member of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and most recently, as Administrator of the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In that capacity, he became knowledgeable in the field of climate and its impact on the Great Lakes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He currently serves on CFACT’s Board of Advisors. Johnson holds a B.A. degree from Yale University, and a J.D. from the University of Virginia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has recently decided two cases which indicate that federal district courts are prepared to roll back the relentless onslaught of regulatory overreach advanced by the Biden Administration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":268269,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818336,691821208,691819202,691821205,691821206,691819259,691818397,691821207],"class_list":{"0":"post-268261","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-biden-administration","9":"tag-climate-regulatory","10":"tag-doe","11":"tag-federal-courts","12":"tag-maine-lobstermens-association","13":"tag-national-marine-fisheries-service","14":"tag-noaa","15":"tag-north-atlantic-right-whale","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-572.png?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-17MN","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":406104,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406104","url_meta":{"origin":268261,"position":0},"title":"Revolution Wind Is barking up the wrong tree","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There has been a flurry of activity surrounding the Revolution Wind project off of Rhode Island over the past month.","rel":"","context":"In \"Administrative Procedure Act (APA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Administrative Procedure Act (APA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=administrative-procedure-act-apa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0Woman-wind-turbines-sunset-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0Woman-wind-turbines-sunset-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0Woman-wind-turbines-sunset-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0Woman-wind-turbines-sunset-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0Woman-wind-turbines-sunset-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C672&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266511,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=266511","url_meta":{"origin":268261,"position":1},"title":"Energy Appliance Victory! (DC Circuit vs. DOE)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Beleaguered energy consumers were just handed a far-reaching victory by the\u00a0United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia\u00a0(DC Circuit). The ruling\u00a0vacated\u00a0a Final Rule from the U.S, Department of Energy (DOE) that would have banned the manufacture and sale of non-condensing boilers for use in commercial applications.","rel":"","context":"In \"Department of Energy (DOE)\"","block_context":{"text":"Department of Energy (DOE)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=department-of-energy-doe"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0doe-logo.png?fit=1200%2C972&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0doe-logo.png?fit=1200%2C972&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0doe-logo.png?fit=1200%2C972&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0doe-logo.png?fit=1200%2C972&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0doe-logo.png?fit=1200%2C972&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217290,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=217290","url_meta":{"origin":268261,"position":2},"title":"Biden Energy Policies: Incoherent, Incompetent, Intolerable","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/09\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"They raise energy prices, hurt living standards, and impair our future as a law-abiding nation","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-223.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206769,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=206769","url_meta":{"origin":268261,"position":3},"title":"Obama\/Biden\u2019s EPA Power Grab Blown Up","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Paul Homewood This is perhaps the most far reaching decision made in the Supreme Court for some time. Behind all of the legalese, it sets very powerful limits on the power of executive agencies, what we might call quangos: The Environmental Protection Agency had its way with both the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0image4546o4.png?fit=1021%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0image4546o4.png?fit=1021%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0image4546o4.png?fit=1021%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0image4546o4.png?fit=1021%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259288,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259288","url_meta":{"origin":268261,"position":4},"title":"Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling Delivers Blow To Biden\u2019s WOTUS Regs","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a ruling narrowing the federal government\u2019s authority to regulate bodies of water and effectively\u00a0upending a Biden administration policy\u00a0that recently went into effect.","rel":"","context":"In \"EPA\"","block_context":{"text":"EPA","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=epa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0The-Supreme-Court-Delivered-a-Huge-Blow-to-Joe-Biden-That-Left-Him-Stunned-e1621627803828.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0The-Supreme-Court-Delivered-a-Huge-Blow-to-Joe-Biden-That-Left-Him-Stunned-e1621627803828.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0The-Supreme-Court-Delivered-a-Huge-Blow-to-Joe-Biden-That-Left-Him-Stunned-e1621627803828.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0The-Supreme-Court-Delivered-a-Huge-Blow-to-Joe-Biden-That-Left-Him-Stunned-e1621627803828.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0The-Supreme-Court-Delivered-a-Huge-Blow-to-Joe-Biden-That-Left-Him-Stunned-e1621627803828.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207030,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=207030","url_meta":{"origin":268261,"position":5},"title":"SCOTUS message to EPA, agencies: You\u2019re not legislatures","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"A landmark June 30 Supreme Court ruling\u00a0in favor of plaintiff states in West Virginia v. EPA will have enormously profound and far-reaching separation of powers implications limiting de facto lawmaking powers of executive branch-controlled regulatory agencies. Whereas certain special interest groups are vehemently criticizing the court\u2019s 6-3 vote determination as\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/00Gina-Mccarthy-EPA.jpg?fit=902%2C544&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/00Gina-Mccarthy-EPA.jpg?fit=902%2C544&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/00Gina-Mccarthy-EPA.jpg?fit=902%2C544&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/00Gina-Mccarthy-EPA.jpg?fit=902%2C544&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=268261"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268261\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":268270,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268261\/revisions\/268270"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/268269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=268261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=268261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=268261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}