{"id":266809,"date":"2023-07-11T20:16:23","date_gmt":"2023-07-11T18:16:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=266809"},"modified":"2023-07-11T20:16:33","modified_gmt":"2023-07-11T18:16:33","slug":"fes-2023-the-emperor-still-has-no-clothes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=266809","title":{"rendered":"FES 2023\u2013The Emperor Still Has No\u00a0Clothes!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.nationalgrideso.com\/future-energy\/future-energy-scenarios\/documents<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This year\u2019s National Grid\u2019s Future Energy Scenarios has been released, and as before fails to address the real problems facing the pursuit of Net Zero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As usual, there are four scenarios. The most optimistic is called Leading The Way, which has as much chance of being achieved as England winning the next World Cup. The most realistic is Falling Short, which only cuts emissions by about half come 2050.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But I\u2019ll concentrate on the other two:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

As before, I will focus on 2035, as nobody can predict what will happen in 30 years time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consumer Transformation looks a highly unlikely outcome. It assumes, for instance, that there will be 12 million heat pumps installed by 2035; there is simply no prospect of this unless the gas boiler ban takes effect a decade earlier. It is also unlikely that consumers will drastically alter their habits in terms of demand side response, or be willing to spend thousands on insulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

System Transformation is slightly more realistic, but not much! This assumes 3 million heat pumps by 2035, but with an annual rollout of about 160,000 as soon as 2025, again extremely implausible. Because of this slow take up of heat pumps, the scenario assumes most heating will use hydrogen boilers, which in turn raises a separate question \u2013 where will this hydrogen come from? The FES answer is mainly from steam reforming natural gas, in theory using CCUS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And in turn, this raises two more issues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1) Steam reforming uses much more natural gas than you would use if you burnt it in the first place. It is therefore extremely expensive and inefficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2) Even with CCUS, there are still some emissions, as the process cannot capture all of the carbon dioxide, only about two-thirds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under ST, we will still be consuming 581 TWh of natural gas in 2035, compared to 986 TWh currently. This clearly makes a nonsense of the Labour Party\u2019s plan to stop all new North Sea exploration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But now we come to the crucial question of what our power system will look like in 2035. Below are the capacity assumptions in FES:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2035<\/td><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/td>GW<\/td><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Current<\/td><\/td>CT<\/td>ST<\/td><\/tr>
Interconnectors<\/td>7.40<\/td><\/td>19.15<\/td>15.90<\/td><\/tr>
Fossil fuel and CCS<\/td>35.36<\/td><\/td>24.11<\/td>27.39<\/td><\/tr>
Solar<\/td>0.04<\/td><\/td>4.93<\/td>2.61<\/td><\/tr>
Offshore Wind<\/td>12.75<\/td><\/td>78.27<\/td>69.84<\/td><\/tr>
Onshore Wind<\/td>7.94<\/td><\/td>20.83<\/td>20.83<\/td><\/tr>
Other generation<\/td>11.06<\/td><\/td>16.62<\/td>15.88<\/td><\/tr>
Storage<\/td>3.34<\/td><\/td>21.15<\/td>14.35<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
Dispatchable<\/strong><\/td><\/strong><\/td><\/strong><\/td>40.73<\/strong><\/td>43.26<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
Peak Demand<\/strong><\/td><\/strong><\/td><\/strong><\/td>98.00<\/strong><\/td>73.00<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

. .<\/p>\n\n\n\n

* Others includes nuclear, bio, BECCS, hydro and hydrogen<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In both scenarios, dispatchable capacity (excl I\/Cs) is woefully short of what is needed. Even with interconnectors, a large shortfall remains, despite the retention of most of our existing CCGT fleet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Storage, according to the FES, will only be about two hours worth on average, so only enough to manage short term peaks in demand. Solar, as we know will produce next to nothing in winter; ( the figures quoted for capacity are, by the way, grid scale installations, and exclude embedded local solar farms).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At a push, you could possibly count on getting a minimum of 5% out of the wind capacity, even on windless days, about 5 GW. But this still leaves us well short in both scenarios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sure, we might be able to reduce peak demand by maybe 10 GW, by smoothing out daily demand. But on the other hand. You would need to build in a reserve of at least 20 GW, to cover for plant outages etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only way to ensure security of supply with these increased electrification scenarios would be to treble our existing CCGT fleet, if necessary modified to burn hydrogen. In the longer term, a tranche pf new nuclear might help to plug the gap, but that would likely take many more years to come about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every year I raise this problem. And every year a new FES comes out, which totally ignores the disaster staring us in the face. There seems to be a naive belief that all of that wind and solar capacity will somehow always provide the power we need. Is it just me? Am I missing something?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It really is a case of the Emperor having no clothes!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It really is a case of the Emperor having no clothes!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":266821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818076,691818247,691818154],"class_list":{"0":"post-266809","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-co2","9":"tag-national-grid","10":"tag-net-zero","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0vort-2017-04-21.png?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-17pn","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363999,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363999","url_meta":{"origin":266809,"position":0},"title":"Watch: Morano on Fox and Friends on offshore wind","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Who would have thought that the Audubon Society, Greenpeace, and the Sierra Club \u2014 would be silent on whale mortality and bird Mortalities? Donald Trump is turning out to be the greatest environmental hero of the 21st century. And I don\u2019t mean \u2014 about endangered species in terms of Offshore\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"bird Mortalities\"","block_context":{"text":"bird Mortalities","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bird-mortalities"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0morano-fox-trump-wind.jpg?fit=1200%2C664&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0morano-fox-trump-wind.jpg?fit=1200%2C664&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0morano-fox-trump-wind.jpg?fit=1200%2C664&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0morano-fox-trump-wind.jpg?fit=1200%2C664&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0morano-fox-trump-wind.jpg?fit=1200%2C664&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366244,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366244","url_meta":{"origin":266809,"position":1},"title":"Claim: Chinese Coal Plant Construction is \u201cUndermining\u201d their Renewable Transition","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026In 2024, coal power construction activity surged to 94.5 GW, its highest level since 2015, reinforcing coal\u2019s entrenched role in the power system. \u2026\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"China\"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=china"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-Chinas-coal-power-expansion.webp?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-Chinas-coal-power-expansion.webp?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-Chinas-coal-power-expansion.webp?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-Chinas-coal-power-expansion.webp?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-Chinas-coal-power-expansion.webp?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237671,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=237671","url_meta":{"origin":266809,"position":2},"title":"The Pied Piper Has No Clothes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the last article I quoted a portion of\u00a0Dr. Robert Howarth\u2019s statement\u00a0in which he more or less claimed credit for the Climate Act.\u00a0 \u00a0This post uses two children\u2019s tales to illustrate my concerns about his claimed basis for the Act.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-109.png?fit=1051%2C828&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-109.png?fit=1051%2C828&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-109.png?fit=1051%2C828&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-109.png?fit=1051%2C828&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-109.png?fit=1051%2C828&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199704,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=199704","url_meta":{"origin":266809,"position":3},"title":"Claim: California can Hit 85% Renewable Energy by 2030","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Essay by Eric Worrall According to\u00a0\u201cEnergy Innovation\u201d\u00a0and\u00a0Telos Energy, California can improve grid stability and hit green energy targets by shutting down most remaining fossil fuel capacity, and fully committing to a green energy grid. California Can Reliably Hit 85% Clean Energy By 2030 Without Risking Outages \u2013 En Route To\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0104077882_s.webp?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0104077882_s.webp?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0104077882_s.webp?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0104077882_s.webp?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":396187,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=396187","url_meta":{"origin":266809,"position":4},"title":"Climate campaign lawsuit seeks to censor scientists","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Two prominent left-wing campaign organizations have filed suit to suppress and censor the assessment that five climate science experts recently provided to the Department of Energy.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM3-f6_8QRfQzmbqmoPou-h4suKFPdMXLfBJfCLpWxUD36yuEhKbTqDaBDLRP4cQBQoJO5hUJlZPeMmQJuj0Y-2X1PeBzU5oYfviTxs2K0K73Hn_5oICC_K5Cq7DbcLODNfHWl9bHgRJ2IEYDfRLXujb0Mkjw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM3-f6_8QRfQzmbqmoPou-h4suKFPdMXLfBJfCLpWxUD36yuEhKbTqDaBDLRP4cQBQoJO5hUJlZPeMmQJuj0Y-2X1PeBzU5oYfviTxs2K0K73Hn_5oICC_K5Cq7DbcLODNfHWl9bHgRJ2IEYDfRLXujb0Mkjw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM3-f6_8QRfQzmbqmoPou-h4suKFPdMXLfBJfCLpWxUD36yuEhKbTqDaBDLRP4cQBQoJO5hUJlZPeMmQJuj0Y-2X1PeBzU5oYfviTxs2K0K73Hn_5oICC_K5Cq7DbcLODNfHWl9bHgRJ2IEYDfRLXujb0Mkjw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM3-f6_8QRfQzmbqmoPou-h4suKFPdMXLfBJfCLpWxUD36yuEhKbTqDaBDLRP4cQBQoJO5hUJlZPeMmQJuj0Y-2X1PeBzU5oYfviTxs2K0K73Hn_5oICC_K5Cq7DbcLODNfHWl9bHgRJ2IEYDfRLXujb0Mkjw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQM3-f6_8QRfQzmbqmoPou-h4suKFPdMXLfBJfCLpWxUD36yuEhKbTqDaBDLRP4cQBQoJO5hUJlZPeMmQJuj0Y-2X1PeBzU5oYfviTxs2K0K73Hn_5oICC_K5Cq7DbcLODNfHWl9bHgRJ2IEYDfRLXujb0Mkjw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366417,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366417","url_meta":{"origin":266809,"position":5},"title":"We\u2019re all Doomed!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"So says the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.","rel":"","context":"In \"black swan\"","block_context":{"text":"black swan","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=black-swan"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/01003885-climate-change-g22d1e89521280.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/01003885-climate-change-g22d1e89521280.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/01003885-climate-change-g22d1e89521280.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/01003885-climate-change-g22d1e89521280.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/01003885-climate-change-g22d1e89521280.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=266809"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266809\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":266823,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266809\/revisions\/266823"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/266821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=266809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=266809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=266809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}