{"id":263741,"date":"2023-06-24T21:08:50","date_gmt":"2023-06-24T19:08:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263741"},"modified":"2023-06-24T21:08:52","modified_gmt":"2023-06-24T19:08:52","slug":"do-cosmic-rays-precede-earthquakes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263741","title":{"rendered":"Do Cosmic Rays Precede Earthquakes?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"414\" data-attachment-id=\"263747\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=263747\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?fit=1600%2C915&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1600,915\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?fit=723%2C414&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?resize=723%2C414&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-263747\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?resize=1024%2C586&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?resize=300%2C172&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?resize=768%2C439&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?resize=1536%2C878&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?resize=1200%2C686&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em><strong>Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"447\" data-attachment-id=\"263745\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=263745\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-360.png?fit=790%2C488&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"790,488\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-360\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-360.png?fit=723%2C447&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-360.png?resize=723%2C447&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-263745\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-360.png?w=790&amp;ssl=1 790w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-360.png?resize=300%2C185&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-360.png?resize=768%2C474&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I came across an article with a provocative headline, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/scientists-cosmic-radiation-earthquakes-1807690\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Scientists Link Cosmic Radiation to Earthquakes for the First Time<\/a>\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So I went to look at the underlying study,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S1364682623000664\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Observation of large scale precursor correlations between cosmic rays and earthquakes with a periodicity similar to the solar cycle<\/a>&nbsp;by P. Homola and 43 others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hmmm, sez I. Willis\u2019s Rule of Authors says that the strength of a scientific study is inversely proportional to the number of authors \u2026 but I digress. The Abstract says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The search for correlations between secondary cosmic ray detection rates and seismic effects has long been a subject of investigation motivated by the hope of identifying a new precursor type that could feed a global early warning system against earthquakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here we show for the first time that the average variation of the cosmic ray detection rates correlates with the global seismic activity to be observed with a time lag of approximately two weeks, and that the significance of the effect varies with a periodicity resembling the undecenal solar cycle, with a shift in phase of around three years, exceeding 6 \u03c3 at local maxima.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The precursor characteristics of the observed correlations point to a pioneer perspective of an early warning system against earthquakes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The study says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here we report on an observation of the correlations between variation of the average rates of secondary cosmic ray fluxes measured locally and global seismic activity, and we also point to the periodicity of these correlations (or their observability) which corresponds to sunspot number observations back to the 1960s.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They describe their method as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2026 an alternative, novel approach on which we report here: comparing the absolute average variabilities of secondary cosmic radiation to the average global sum of earthquake magnitudes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And their conclusion was:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We have demonstrated for the first time that the variation of the absolute average detection rates of secondary cosmic radiation correlates with the global seismic situation (sum of the magnitudes of earthquakes with magnitudes greater-than or equal to 4, occurring at all locations) that takes place approximately two weeks later than the relevant cosmic ray data. The size of the shift in time between the cosmic and seismic data sets reveals the precursor character of the correlation effect.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So to see if this made sense, I went and got the data for&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ngdc.noaa.gov\/hazel\/view\/hazards\/earthquake\/event-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">earthquakes<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nmdb.eu\/nest\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">cosmic rays<\/a>, and&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/sidc.be\/silso\/DATA\/SN_m_tot_V2.0.txt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sunspots<\/a>. You can\u2019t do a CEEMD or a Fourier analysis unless the data is regularly spaced in time or space, which earthquake data isn\u2019t. So I used a variation of Fourier analysis that I&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2014\/05\/26\/well-color-me-gobsmacked\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">invented a few years back<\/a>, only to find out that I wasn\u2019t the first to invent it. Tamino informed me that&nbsp;<em>\u201cThe method you describe is very clever. It\u2019s also known (in the astronomical literature at least) as the Date-Compensated Discrete Fourier Transform, or DCDFT (Ferraz-Mello, S. 1981, Astron. J., 86, 619).\u201d<\/em>&nbsp;Fair enough, it proves that I understand Fourier transforms \u2026 the main advantage of the method is that it doesn\u2019t require that the data be regularly spaced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">My logic was that if the magnitudes of earthquakes are related to sunspots and cosmic rays as the 44 authors claim, we should see some kind of a significant ~11-year cycle in the earthquake data. Here\u2019s the result of my analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"263743\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=263743\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-359.png?fit=720%2C667&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"720,667\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image-359\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-359.png?fit=720%2C667&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-359.png?resize=723%2C670&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-263743\" width=\"723\" height=\"670\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-359.png?w=720&amp;ssl=1 720w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/image-359.png?resize=300%2C278&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Figure 1. Fourier Periodograms of monthly sunspots, earthquake average magnitudes, and cosmic rays. The three longest records of cosmic rays are from Thule, Greenland; Jungfraujoch, Switzerland; and Newark, NJ USA. In addition to the earthquakes of magnitude greater than 4 studied by the authors, I also looked at earthquakes of&nbsp;magnitude greater than&nbsp;<\/em>7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From the periodogram, it\u2019s obvious that there are no significant cycles in earthquakes at around 11 years. You can see that the cosmic rays are closely connected to sunspots, for well-understood physical reasons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But there\u2019s no such connection between sunspots or cosmic rays and earthquakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Does this complete lack of any significant ~11-year cycles in earthquakes show that the 44 authors are wrong?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nope. Maybe they have discovered the secret sauce for connecting cosmic rays and earthquakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But it sure makes their claim much less likely \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">My very best wishes to you all,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">w.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PS: Yeah, you\u2019ve heard it before, you\u2019ll hear it again. To cut down the number of misunderstandings, when you comment PLEASE&nbsp;<strong><em>quote the exact words<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;you are discussing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My logic was that if the magnitudes of earthquakes are related to sunspots and cosmic rays as the 44 authors claim, we should see some kind of a significant ~11-year cycle in the earthquake data. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":263747,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691820265,691820468,691819083],"class_list":{"0":"post-263741","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-cosmic-radiation","9":"tag-earthquakes","10":"tag-sunspots","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00chirality-molecules-cosmic-rays_1600.jpg?fit=1600%2C915&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-16BT","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299296,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299296","url_meta":{"origin":263741,"position":0},"title":"A Curious Correlation -Sunspots vs. Major Hurricane Frequency","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"How about the weather on the other planets in our solar system? Might it be influenced by galactic cosmic rays just like here on Earth? The clouds of Neptune captured by the Hubble Space Telescope were obtained over nearly 30 years over which is plotted the solar UV radiation during\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Cosmic Rays (CR)\"","block_context":{"text":"Cosmic Rays (CR)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cosmic-rays-cr"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-The-clouds-of-Neptune.jpeg?fit=1172%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-The-clouds-of-Neptune.jpeg?fit=1172%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-The-clouds-of-Neptune.jpeg?fit=1172%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-The-clouds-of-Neptune.jpeg?fit=1172%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0-The-clouds-of-Neptune.jpeg?fit=1172%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":192553,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=192553","url_meta":{"origin":263741,"position":1},"title":"CME Wipes Out Cosmic Rays","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/03\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"March 17, 2022:\u00a0 The March 13th CME did more than spark bright auroras. It also wiped out a lot of cosmic rays.\u00a0Neutron monitors\u00a0at the Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory in Oulu, Finland, recorded a sharp drop in cosmic radiation just after the CME arrived: This is called a \u201eForbush decrease,\u201c named after\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/0forbush_strip2.png?fit=526%2C229&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/0forbush_strip2.png?fit=526%2C229&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/0forbush_strip2.png?fit=526%2C229&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371683,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=371683","url_meta":{"origin":263741,"position":2},"title":"Evidence Found that Cosmic Rays Spark Lightning","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Via\u00a0SpaceWeather.com\u00a0Every second, almost 50 bolts of lightning zig-zag across the skies of Earth. Despite centuries of study, however, researchers still aren\u2019t sure how the bolts get started. Electric fields in thunderclouds are often too weak to ignite a powerful discharge.","rel":"","context":"In \"BIMAP-3D\"","block_context":{"text":"BIMAP-3D","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bimap-3d"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Sergio-Mazzi-Tempestade-SP_1710096138.png?fit=1070%2C1079&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Sergio-Mazzi-Tempestade-SP_1710096138.png?fit=1070%2C1079&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Sergio-Mazzi-Tempestade-SP_1710096138.png?fit=1070%2C1079&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Sergio-Mazzi-Tempestade-SP_1710096138.png?fit=1070%2C1079&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Sergio-Mazzi-Tempestade-SP_1710096138.png?fit=1070%2C1079&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319023,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=319023","url_meta":{"origin":263741,"position":3},"title":"How we know that the sun changes the Climate. Part I: The past","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"19\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Sun is a variable star and the amount of energy it emits varies from month to month, year to year, and century to century. One of the manifestations of these variations are sunspots, which are more common when the Sun is more active and disappear when it is less\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0sunset.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0sunset.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0sunset.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0sunset.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0sunset.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210552,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=210552","url_meta":{"origin":263741,"position":4},"title":"Cosmic Rays are Decreasing","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"July 26, 2022:\u00a0Cosmic rays in the atmosphere are rapidly subsiding. In the past year alone, radiation levels in the air high above California have plummeted more than 15%, according to regular launches of cosmic ray balloons by Spaceweather.com and\u00a0Earth to Sky Calculus. The latest measurement on July 23, 2022, registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0balloondata4.webp?fit=1024%2C615&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0balloondata4.webp?fit=1024%2C615&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0balloondata4.webp?fit=1024%2C615&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0balloondata4.webp?fit=1024%2C615&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237160,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=237160","url_meta":{"origin":263741,"position":5},"title":"Cosmic Rays Sink to a 6-Year Low","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Cosmic rays reaching Earth just hit a six-year low. Neutron counters in Oulu, Finland, registered the sudden decrease on Dec. 26th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) hit Earth\u2019s magnetic field","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-01-103244.png?fit=952%2C503&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-01-103244.png?fit=952%2C503&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-01-103244.png?fit=952%2C503&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2023-01-01-103244.png?fit=952%2C503&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=263741"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":263749,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263741\/revisions\/263749"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/263747"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=263741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=263741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=263741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}