{"id":263675,"date":"2023-06-24T18:28:02","date_gmt":"2023-06-24T16:28:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263675"},"modified":"2023-06-24T18:28:05","modified_gmt":"2023-06-24T16:28:05","slug":"if-the-data-doesnt-illustrate-the-narrative-then-just-make-up-your-own","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263675","title":{"rendered":"If the data doesn\u2019t illustrate the narrative, then just make up your\u00a0own"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Trust, yet verify<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was something else that was odd about the Arctic sea ice volume graph that was used in the Benton lecture of 2018 (see previous post<\/a>). Besides the ambuigity of the last data point and its weird position relative to the previous data points, there also seemed to be something a bit off at the 2012 data point (the lowest point of the graph). When I tried to overlay the Benton lecture graph over the actual annual minimum volume graph, it seemed that the 2012 data point was situated somewhat lower on the Benton lecture graph than it was in the PIOMAS dataset (the dataset this graph was based on). It didn\u2019t seem to be that much at the time, so I wasn\u2019t initially too bothered about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I later decided nevertheless to look into it and digitized the whole graph, instead of just looking at that last data point as I did in previous post. This indeed showed that the 2012 value was somewhat lower in the Benton lecture graph.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It also showed that both graphs are identical until 2009, but there is a small phase-shift from 2010 until 2012:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

That means that the complete bottom part of the Benton lecture graph dropped about 300 km3<\/sup> relative to PIOMAS. Weirdly enough, the 2013 value seems to be unaffected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This means that the person who fabricated the downwards trend after 2013 used a graph that already went a bit lower than what was observed in reality. After this lowered part of the he graph, it went towards the correct 2013 value (exaggerating that increase by 300 km3<\/sup>) and then it plummeted down ending up close to the 2012 value (instead of rising further as is seen in reality). This accentuating the (already lowered) downward trend even more. The difference between the 2015 value of the Benton lecture graph and reality is about 2300 km3<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then the big question: why the need for those fabrications at the end of the Benton lecture graph graph? In 2018, there was data available until September 2017, so it would have been possible to add four more data points<\/strong> to that graph.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I think the reason could be rather straight forward. Just look at a comparison that I made between what was shown in the lecture and how the minimum volume data would have looked like back then:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

So, if you wanted to convey in January 2018 that the Arctic is prime evidence of irreversible changes in the climate system and that the Arctic would be ice-free by 2022, then which one of the two graphs would you choose to illustrate this narrative? Would you choose the one with the fabricated tail end on the left or the one with the actual data on the right?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So, if you wanted to convey in January 2018 that the Arctic is prime evidence of irreversible changes in the climate system and that the Arctic would be ice-free by 2022, then which one of the two graphs would you choose to illustrate this narrative? Would you choose the one with the fabricated tail end on the left or the one with the actual data on the right?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":263682,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818990,691818056,691818090],"class_list":{"0":"post-263675","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-arctic-sea-ice","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-climate-warning","12":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0arctic-ocean-10.jpg?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-16AP","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208337,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=208337","url_meta":{"origin":263675,"position":0},"title":"Update on Arctic Sea ice minimum volume","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Reading previous post on the Arctic sea ice extent, you could ask yourself: what about the Arctic sea ice volume? Well, that is the exact same question that I asked myself when I was busy creating the minimum Arctic sea ice extent graph. It was a long time ago when\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=208337#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0chart0017c_arctic_sea_ice_minimum_volume_1979-2021_with_cubic_trendline.webp?fit=624%2C468&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0chart0017c_arctic_sea_ice_minimum_volume_1979-2021_with_cubic_trendline.webp?fit=624%2C468&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0chart0017c_arctic_sea_ice_minimum_volume_1979-2021_with_cubic_trendline.webp?fit=624%2C468&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419856,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419856","url_meta":{"origin":263675,"position":1},"title":"Arctic Ice Recovering 2025\u00a0Yearend","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Sea ice extent is the total area of ocean covered by at least 15% sea ice, measured daily via satellite passive microwave sensors (e.g., NSIDC Sea Ice Index). It differs from sea ice area (which accounts for actual ice concentration) or volume\/thickness. Extent is a key climate indicator because it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Arctic Ice\"","block_context":{"text":"Arctic Ice","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arctic-ice"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQOKlKbXXj78ZND9m8v7CAsaTpNx7zuG8EEqsRtVS8ItC_FrhUjQZrN9cV3pbHOaEsC79TU93CX8kvZZyYCudf4iKlfwmCieEsB7MeOH1YkcahmdAaDCkzOpOcB1_sgy.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQOKlKbXXj78ZND9m8v7CAsaTpNx7zuG8EEqsRtVS8ItC_FrhUjQZrN9cV3pbHOaEsC79TU93CX8kvZZyYCudf4iKlfwmCieEsB7MeOH1YkcahmdAaDCkzOpOcB1_sgy.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQOKlKbXXj78ZND9m8v7CAsaTpNx7zuG8EEqsRtVS8ItC_FrhUjQZrN9cV3pbHOaEsC79TU93CX8kvZZyYCudf4iKlfwmCieEsB7MeOH1YkcahmdAaDCkzOpOcB1_sgy.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQOKlKbXXj78ZND9m8v7CAsaTpNx7zuG8EEqsRtVS8ItC_FrhUjQZrN9cV3pbHOaEsC79TU93CX8kvZZyYCudf4iKlfwmCieEsB7MeOH1YkcahmdAaDCkzOpOcB1_sgy.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQOKlKbXXj78ZND9m8v7CAsaTpNx7zuG8EEqsRtVS8ItC_FrhUjQZrN9cV3pbHOaEsC79TU93CX8kvZZyYCudf4iKlfwmCieEsB7MeOH1YkcahmdAaDCkzOpOcB1_sgy.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":392578,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=392578","url_meta":{"origin":263675,"position":2},"title":"Update: Strange Sea Ice Data July End\u00a02025","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Before presenting the MASIE and SII results for July, a note about a strange thing in today\u2019s Sea Ice Index report.\u00a0 I have sent a note to them requesting an explanation for why the values have been altered from those in the dataset just two days ago.\u00a0 When attempting to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Arctic Ice Extents\"","block_context":{"text":"Arctic Ice Extents","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arctic-ice-extents"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQPBysCj3xKtUwUL1RqlD4s_iNfF081OBdi2B__mKNTehgCCwO8t3Dbo4oTXTdQxix3EZ5fkM370IAgGaP_mTix7RPDwN9xG3MAiqzjZzfHK223KJO4SLLFYXHR4v2HfLWj2yN6vlZU21cjJEWL4qBW4Lwedaw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQPBysCj3xKtUwUL1RqlD4s_iNfF081OBdi2B__mKNTehgCCwO8t3Dbo4oTXTdQxix3EZ5fkM370IAgGaP_mTix7RPDwN9xG3MAiqzjZzfHK223KJO4SLLFYXHR4v2HfLWj2yN6vlZU21cjJEWL4qBW4Lwedaw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQPBysCj3xKtUwUL1RqlD4s_iNfF081OBdi2B__mKNTehgCCwO8t3Dbo4oTXTdQxix3EZ5fkM370IAgGaP_mTix7RPDwN9xG3MAiqzjZzfHK223KJO4SLLFYXHR4v2HfLWj2yN6vlZU21cjJEWL4qBW4Lwedaw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQPBysCj3xKtUwUL1RqlD4s_iNfF081OBdi2B__mKNTehgCCwO8t3Dbo4oTXTdQxix3EZ5fkM370IAgGaP_mTix7RPDwN9xG3MAiqzjZzfHK223KJO4SLLFYXHR4v2HfLWj2yN6vlZU21cjJEWL4qBW4Lwedaw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQPBysCj3xKtUwUL1RqlD4s_iNfF081OBdi2B__mKNTehgCCwO8t3Dbo4oTXTdQxix3EZ5fkM370IAgGaP_mTix7RPDwN9xG3MAiqzjZzfHK223KJO4SLLFYXHR4v2HfLWj2yN6vlZU21cjJEWL4qBW4Lwedaw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216548,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=216548","url_meta":{"origin":263675,"position":3},"title":"Arctic Ice at Decade-High Level: Can Doomsayers Explain?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"31\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Why were internationally acclaimed climate scientists unable to predict this marked increase in the extent of summer sea ice?","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0image-1437.png?fit=1024%2C535&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0image-1437.png?fit=1024%2C535&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0image-1437.png?fit=1024%2C535&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/0image-1437.png?fit=1024%2C535&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235281,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=235281","url_meta":{"origin":263675,"position":4},"title":"CNBC and Other Media Outlets Miss the Mark Regarding NOAA\u2019 s Misleading \u2018Arctic Report Card\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/12\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"This represents the first time that NOAA has directly blamed humans for issues in the Arctic, but the report title is a misleading, since the report itself provides no data tying supposed human caused climate change to the changes it discusses in the Arctic.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/00Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph-21.png?fit=1029%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/00Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph-21.png?fit=1029%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/00Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph-21.png?fit=1029%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/00Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph-21.png?fit=1029%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":395863,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=395863","url_meta":{"origin":263675,"position":5},"title":"Arctic Ice Returns to Mean Mid-August\u00a02025","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"After a sub-par March maximum, by end of May 2025 Arctic ice closed the gap with the 19-year average. Then in June the gap reopened and in July the melting pace matched the average, about four days in advance of average. Now mid-August MASIE shows the Arctic ice extent matching\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Arctic Ice\"","block_context":{"text":"Arctic Ice","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arctic-ice"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-10-22T125511.784.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-10-22T125511.784.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-10-22T125511.784.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-10-22T125511.784.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=263675"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263675\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":263684,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263675\/revisions\/263684"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/263682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=263675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=263675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=263675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}