{"id":260940,"date":"2023-06-06T15:42:27","date_gmt":"2023-06-06T13:42:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=260940"},"modified":"2023-06-06T15:42:29","modified_gmt":"2023-06-06T13:42:29","slug":"investors-sour-on-esg-activism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=260940","title":{"rendered":"Investors Sour on ESG\u00a0Activism"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Science Matters<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Ron Clutz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Zero Carbon zealots attacking ExxonMobil, here seen without their shareholder disguises.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

WSJ reports with a sad tone what is actually good news that investors are pushing back against ESG political correctness. Their article is: ESG Blowback: Exxon, Chevron Investors Reject Climate Measures <\/strong><\/a> Excerpts in italics with my bolds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An investor-driven climate change push at some of the
world\u2019s largest oil companies has stalled out.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On Wednesday, Exxon Mobil and Chevron\u2019s shareholders struck down a raft of proposals<\/strong> urging the companies to cut greenhouse-gas emissions<\/strong> derived from fuel consumption, put out new reports on climate benchmarks<\/strong> and disclose certain oil-spill risks, among other initiatives.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The votes were abysmal for climate activists<\/strong>. All but two of the 20 shareholder proposals for the two companies garnered less than 25% of investors\u2019 vote<\/strong>, according to preliminary results, with some performing much worse than similar proposals put forward last year.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among the most controversial proposals<\/strong> were those that would have had the companies adopt targets for reducing emissions<\/strong> including those from third-party consumption<\/strong> of their products, such as when drivers burn gasoline in their cars, also known as Scope 3 emissions.<\/strong> Those received only 11% and 10% of the vote<\/strong> among Exxon and Chevron investors, respectively, compared with 27% and 33% for similar proposals last year.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent weeks, similar climate proposals failed to win over most shareholders
at annual meetings of British oil and gas giants BP and Shell in London.<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investment strategies linked to ESG,<\/strong>\u00a0short for environmental, social and corporate-governance issues,\u00a0had gained momentum in recent years,<\/strong>\u00a0particularly following the onset of the pandemic in 2020. Investors pressed oil companies to show how they were working to reduce their climate footprint, set long-term environmental goals and curtail the flaring of unwanted natural gas.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

In 2021<\/strong>, investment firm Engine No. 1 prevailed in a historic proxy battle against Exxon, winning three board seats<\/strong> at the company\u2019s annual meeting with the backing of investment firms<\/strong>, Vanguard, State Street and BlackRock. The firm argued that Exxon needed to form a better strategy to prepare for the world\u2019s anticipated energy transition.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

After the defeat, Exxon adopted a so-called net zero commitment \u2014 a goal to reduce
or offset greenhouse-gas emissions from its operations to zero by 2050.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Wednesday\u2019s votes demonstrated how some shareholders have backed off<\/strong> pushing major oil companies to embrace certain climate goals. Investors said many voices pushing ESG measures have been drowned out following Russia\u2019s war in Ukraine, which caused oil and gas prices to skyrocket as global supplies were crimped.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mark van Baal,<\/strong> founder of environmental activist<\/strong> group Follow This, said<\/strong> shareholders missed an opportunity at the annual votes. Investors know that avoiding climate disaster will require global emissions to fall by almost half by 2030<\/strong>, he said, but many are focused on short-term profits.<\/em> [Note: van Baal is wrong about disaster\u2013see Even 3\u00b0C Warming Can\u2019t Stop World Prosperity.<\/strong><\/a> ]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The industry and its allies have said some countries, particularly in Europe<\/strong>, were too quick to move away from fossil fuels<\/strong> toward clean energy sources such as solar and wind. A movement against climate activism<\/strong> has gained political traction in the U.S., particularly among Republican voters. Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, has made anti-ESG policies a central plank of his campaign.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The pushback against ESG measures has also hit investment firms such as BlackRock,
which have faced potential boycotts in Texas and other red states.<\/mark><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Republican officials in Florida, Texas, Louisiana and South Carolina pulled more than $4 billion in pension and investment funds from BlackRock starting last year. BlackRock brought in $230 billion from U.S. clients in 2022.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It wasn\u2019t immediately clear how BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard voted<\/strong> at the meetings this week.  State Street and BlackRock declined to comment. Vanguard didn\u2019t immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investments in fossil fuels pushed many oil companies to record profits last year,<\/strong> which lured back some investors who had fled after years of meager returns from the industry. Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods<\/strong> said Wednesday the company had benefited from investing in fossil fuels when others pulled back.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even in Europe,<\/strong> energy executives have shown a willingness to alienate clean-energy investors to tailor strategies to the thirst for fossil fuels. BP and Shell\u2019s<\/strong> record full-year 2022 profits and hefty returns<\/strong> to investors have attracted new investors, and won back some who were dubious of their energy-transition strategies, executives said.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shell and BP executives have said their strategies are consistent with targets to lower global emissions, while also helping supply the oil and gas still demanded in coming years globally. Exxon and Chevron have said they support the emissions targets set by the Paris climate accords and reducing emissions from their operations.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Woods and other industry executives have argued some climate-related proposals would backfire or leave the economy worse off<\/strong>. Woods said several proposals rejected Wednesday would have required the company to assume the world will cut carbon emissions at a much faster pace than observers have projected.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSome [would] go so far as to force us to decrease oil and gas development,\u201d he said. \u201cThis would do nothing to reduce global demand.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
What is actually beyond debate is not that we are in a climate crisis<\/strong>
but that if we don\u2019t stop destroying our conventional energy economy,<\/strong>
we are going to be in a civilizational crisis.<\/strong><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

An investor-driven climate change push at some of the
\nworld\u2019s largest oil companies has stalled out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":260950,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691820005,691820003,691818056,691818229,691820002,691818154,691819831,691820004],"class_list":{"0":"post-260940","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-bp","9":"tag-chevron","10":"tag-climate-change","11":"tag-esg","12":"tag-exxon-mobil","13":"tag-net-zero","14":"tag-shell","15":"tag-zero-carbon-zealots","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0shutterstock_1643783716-min-1536x1024-1.jpg?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-15SI","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261059,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=261059","url_meta":{"origin":260940,"position":0},"title":"Peak ESG behind us: Investors throw out climate fantasies","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"How times have changed. After the energy crisis of 2022, investors at major oil and gas firms are spurning climate activism. A year ago, nearly a third of investors at Chevron and Exxon voted for the draconian \u201cScope 3\u201d emissions targets.","rel":"","context":"In \"BlackRock\"","block_context":{"text":"BlackRock","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=blackrock"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0esg-financial-investing-data-streaming.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0esg-financial-investing-data-streaming.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0esg-financial-investing-data-streaming.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0esg-financial-investing-data-streaming.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0esg-financial-investing-data-streaming.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205314,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=205314","url_meta":{"origin":260940,"position":1},"title":"DISCLOSING THE REAL \u201cCLIMATE RISK\u201d: CASE STUDY: UK \u201cESG\u201d Billionaire Behind U.S. Climate Regulatory, Litigation Campaigns","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/21\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"From Government Accountability & Oversight WEBEDITOR GAO published research today revealing the breadth and depth of a campaign by \u201cESG\u201d investors \u00a0\u2014 and one investor in particular \u2014 costing hundreds of millions of dollars and instilling in investors the fear that their assets could become worthless, or nearly so, as\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-80.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-80.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-80.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-80.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239288,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=239288","url_meta":{"origin":260940,"position":2},"title":"ESG Fell to Earth in 2022","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In reality, it\u2019s about investors and debt providers driving the decarbonization of Western companies and sunsetting its oil and gas companies.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/00Screenshot-2023-01-12-145507.png?fit=766%2C872&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/00Screenshot-2023-01-12-145507.png?fit=766%2C872&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/00Screenshot-2023-01-12-145507.png?fit=766%2C872&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/00Screenshot-2023-01-12-145507.png?fit=766%2C872&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221554,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=221554","url_meta":{"origin":260940,"position":3},"title":"Bloomberg and NewsBusters Show ESG Is Neither Virtuous Nor Profitable","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/30\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bloomberg analysis shows that the \u201cwoke\u201d ESG movement is a scam.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1481.png?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1481.png?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1481.png?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1481.png?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1481.png?fit=1200%2C762&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231727,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=231727","url_meta":{"origin":260940,"position":4},"title":"Biden Labor Department pushes ESG investing and will short-change investors","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/30\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Biden administration is greenlighting politically driven asset managers to funnel investments into companies aligned with the current administration\u2019s agenda","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-1009.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-1009.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-1009.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-1009.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-1009.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/image-1009.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237024,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=237024","url_meta":{"origin":260940,"position":5},"title":"2022: The Year ESG Fell to Earth","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/31\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Although the disintegration of ESG as an investment strategy became unmistakable in 2022, its existence as a political doctrine will continue until it is challenged and defeated.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-974.png?fit=892%2C537&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-974.png?fit=892%2C537&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-974.png?fit=892%2C537&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/image-974.png?fit=892%2C537&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=260940"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260940\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":260952,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260940\/revisions\/260952"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/260950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=260940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=260940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=260940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}