{"id":258212,"date":"2023-05-21T18:21:34","date_gmt":"2023-05-21T16:21:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=258212"},"modified":"2023-05-21T18:21:36","modified_gmt":"2023-05-21T16:21:36","slug":"climate-hoax-years-ago-at-rtl-and-3sat-now-only-at-auf1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=258212","title":{"rendered":"Climate hoax: Years ago at RTL and 3sat, now only at AUF1"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From AUF1.INFO<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Christoph Uhlmann<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The era of opinion domination of the mainstream media is clearly coming to an end. Viewership and circulation figures continue to plummet \u2013 as does trust in reporting. <\/strong>The latter was recently found in a study by the University of Mainz<\/strong><\/a>. According to the study, public broadcasting, for example, has recorded the lowest trust value since the beginning of the long-term study. After it became known how many journalists are in the pay of the state, hardly surprising.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the study, 66 percent of West Germans, but only 41 percent of citizens in the new federal states, express their confidence in state broadcasters.\u00a0Of\u00a0course, as\u00a0AUF1.INFO reported<\/a>, this loss of trust does not come out of nowhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hundreds of journalists bought<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Media reports about bought journalists have accumulated in recent weeks and months and paint a disastrous picture of the German media landscape.\u00a0It became public that well over a hundred journalists received government funding. Among them, for example, Johannes B. Kerner, Eckart von Hirschhausen and Florian Schroeder, who held out their hands as well as “Mr. Wissen2Go”, Mirko Drotschmann. Harald Lesch and Dunja Hayali are also on the state “payroll”,\u00a0as Pleiteticker.de reported<\/a>.\u00a0And if the state pays supposed journalists, then it should also be clear that this is not exactly conducive to independent reporting that deviates from the government line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate dwindling on RTL and 3sat \u2013 unthinkable today<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

For example, a critical examination of the climate hoax in the system media would be unthinkable in times of the green-dominated traffic light government. This was not always the case: In 2007, the private broadcaster RTL had shown a critical documentary as part of its “RTL Extra” format. The main message of the approximately 40-minute contribution: The theory of man-made global warming is wrong. “The climate hoax<\/a>” was the title of RTL’s contribution. It was an edited version of the\u00a0British documentary “The Great Global Warming Swindle”, which had previously been heavily criticized for errors<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The climate catastrophe does not exist”<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

In it, scientists and climate researchers point out, for example, the extreme susceptibility to error of climate models. Such predictions, which are often astronomically wrong, have also been known since Corona from the always incorrect forecasts of the number of deaths. The documentary also points out that there have been times in the history of the earth with 3 times, even 10 times as much CO2 as today. And the founding director of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Prof. Akasofu, declares that “the climate catastrophe does not exist.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this video entitled “Climate hoax: What are the real facts?”, AUF1 has shown that years ago the mainstream media refuted this new religious nonsense even with scientifically correct facts:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n