{"id":256943,"date":"2023-05-11T19:17:18","date_gmt":"2023-05-11T17:17:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=256943"},"modified":"2023-05-11T19:17:21","modified_gmt":"2023-05-11T17:17:21","slug":"thorough-analysis-by-clintel-shows-serious-errors-in-latest-ipcc-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=256943","title":{"rendered":"Thorough analysis by Clintel shows serious errors in latest IPCC report"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"837\" data-attachment-id=\"256950\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=256950\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?fit=795%2C920&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"795,920\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?fit=723%2C837&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?resize=723%2C837&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-256950\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?w=795&amp;ssl=1 795w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?resize=259%2C300&amp;ssl=1 259w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?resize=768%2C889&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"http:\/\/Watts Up With That?\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"256946\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=256946\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-190812.png?fit=750%2C866&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"750,866\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0Screenshot-2023-05-11-190812\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-190812.png?fit=723%2C835&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-190812.png?resize=723%2C835&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-256946\" width=\"723\" height=\"835\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-190812.png?w=750&amp;ssl=1 750w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-190812.png?resize=260%2C300&amp;ssl=1 260w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC-online-version.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC-online-version.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-086cc12b-bacd-4ea3-a330-42f3ca257712\" href=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC-online-version.pdf\">Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC-online-version<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC-online-version.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-086cc12b-bacd-4ea3-a330-42f3ca257712\">Herunterladen<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Amsterdam, 9 May 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>* IPCC hides good news about disaster losses and climate-related deaths<br>* IPCC wrongly claimed the estimate of climate sensitivity is above 2.5<\/em>\u00b0C; it is more likely below&nbsp;<em>2<\/em>\u00b0C<em><br>* IPCC misleads policy makers by focusing on an implausible worst-case emissions scenario<br>* Errors in the AR6 report are worse than those that led to the IAC Review in 2010<br><\/em><strong><br>The IPCC ignored crucial peer-reviewed literature showing that normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and that human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920. The IPCC, by cherry picking from the literature, drew the opposite conclusions, claiming increases in damage and mortality due to anthropogenic climate change. These are two important conclusions of the report&nbsp;<em>The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC<\/em><\/strong>,<strong>&nbsp;published by the Clintel Foundation.<br>The 180-page report is \u2013 as far as we know \u2013 the first serious international \u2018assessment\u2019 of the IPCC\u2019s Sixth Assessment Report. In 13 chapters the Clintel report shows the IPCC rewrote climate history, emphasizes an implausible worst-case scenario, has a huge bias in favour of \u2018bad news\u2019 and against \u2018good news\u2019, and keeps the good news out of the&nbsp;<em>Summary for Policy Makers<\/em>.<br>The errors and biases that Clintel documents in the report are far worse than those that led to the investigation of the IPCC by the Interacademy Council (IAC Review) in 2010. Clintel believes that the IPCC should reform or be dismantled.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With the recently published&nbsp;<em>Synthesis Report<\/em>, the IPCC finished its sixth assessment cycle, consisting of seven reports in total. An international team of scientists from the Clintel network has analysed several claims from the Working Group 1 (<em>The Physical Science Basis<\/em>) and Working Group 2 (<em>Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability<\/em>) reports. This has now led to the report&nbsp;<em>The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In every chapter the Clintel report documents biases and errors in the IPCC assessment. The errors are worse in the WG2 report than in the WG1 report. Given the political relevance of what is known as \u201cLoss and Damage\u201d (at the yearly COP meetings, countries currently negotiate donations to a Loss and Damage fund) one would expect a thorough review of the relevant literature. However, Clintel shows that the IPCC has totally failed in this respect. For example, a review article on the subject, published in 2020, showed that 52 out of 53 peer reviewed papers dealing with \u201cnormalised disaster losses\u201d saw no increase in harms that could be attributed to climate change. The IPCC highlighted the single paper that claimed an increase in losses. That paper is \u2013 unsurprisingly \u2013 flawed, but its cherry picking by the IPCC suggests they found its conclusions irresistible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Climate-related deaths<\/strong><br>\u201c<em>We are on a highway to climate hell<\/em>\u201d, said UN-boss Guterres recently. But an in-depth look at the mortality data shows that climate-related deaths are at an all-time low. Well-known economist Bjorn Lomborg published that important information in a 2020 peer-reviewed paper, but the IPCC, again, chose to ignore it.<br>The strategy of the IPCC seems to be to hide any good news about climate change and hype anything bad.<strong><br><\/strong><br><strong>Erasing climate history<\/strong><br>The Working Group 1 report is not free from bias and misleading conclusions either. The report documents problems in every chapter the Clintel team reviewed. The IPCC has tried to rewrite climate history by erasing the existence of the so-called Holocene Thermal Maximum (or Holocene Climate Optimum), a warm period between 10,000 and 6000 years ago. It has introduced a new hockey stick graph, which is the result of combining cherry-picked proxies. And it has ignored temperature reconstructions that show more variability in the past, such as the well-documented Little Ice Age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The IPCC claims there is an acceleration in the rate of sea-level rise in recent decades. Clintel has shown this claim is flawed, because the IPCC ignores decadal variability in sea level. We also show that its sea-level tool \u2013 made available for the first time \u2013 shows a mysterious and improbable jump upward in 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Climate sensitivity<\/strong><br>Canadian economist Ross McKitrick has pointed out that all global climate models used by the IPCC show too much warming in the troposphere, both globally and in the tropics (where models predict a \u2018hotspot\u2019). This probably indicates some fundamental problems in the way that these models simulate the climate system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A \u2019spectacular\u2019 result of the IPCC AR6 report was the rise of the lower bound for the climate sensitivity likely range from 1.5\u00b0C to 2.5\u00b0C, therefore claiming that low values for climate sensitivity are now unlikely. The Clintel report shows this rise is not justified. The Clintel report suggests that observed warming and other evidence indicates that the true figure is more likely to be below 2\u00b0C than above 2.5\u00b0C. This also means that the best estimate for climate sensitivity, which the IPCC says is 3\u00b0C, is not justified.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On top of that, the IPCC is \u2018addicted\u2019 to its highest emissions scenario, so-called RCP8.5 (or now SSP5-8.5). In recent years, several papers have demonstrated that this scenario is implausible and should not be used for policy purposes. Deep inside the WG1 report, the IPCC acknowledges that this scenario has a \u2018low likelihood\u2019 but this very important remark was not highlighted in the&nbsp;<em>Summary for Policymakers<\/em>, so these important audiences are unaware of the issue. RCP8.5 is the scenario most often referred to in the IPCC report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IAC Review<br><\/strong>Back in 2010, errors in the WG2 report of the Fourth Assessment led to the investigation of the IPCC by the U.N. Interacademy Council (IAC). This review recommended, amongst other things, that \u201c[h]aving author teams with diverse viewpoints is the first step toward ensuring that a full range of thoughtful views are considered.\u201d This important recommendation is still being ignored by the IPCC. Worse, we document that Roger Pielke Jr, a scientist with considerable expertise in these areas, is regarded as a kind of \u2018Voldemort\u2019 by the IPCC, and they deliberately avoid mentioning his work or even his name. This leads to biased conclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Reform<\/strong><br>We are sorry to conclude that the IPCC has done a poor job of assessing the scientific literature. All countries rely on the IPCC reports to support their climate policies and most of the media blindly trust its claims. The Clintel report&nbsp;<em>The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC<\/em>&nbsp;shows that this trust is not justified.<br>In our view the IPCC should be reformed, and should include a broader range of views. Inviting scientists with different views, such as Roger Pielke Jr and Ross McKitrick, to participate more actively in the process is a necessary first step. If, for some reason, such inclusion of different views is unacceptable, the IPCC should be dismantled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our own conclusions about climate \u2013 based on the same underlying literature \u2013 are far less bleak. Due to increasing wealth and advancing technology, humanity is largely immune to climate change and can easily cope with it. Global warming is far less dangerous to humanity than the IPCC tells us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The report can be downloaded&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/clintel.org\/download-ipcc-book-report-2023\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The press release (in English) can be downloaded&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/clintel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Press-release-Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC.pdf\">here<\/a>&nbsp;in pdf.<br>Dutch press release&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/clintel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Persbericht-Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br>Hungarian press release&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/clintel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Press-release-Clintel-The-Frozen-Climate-Views-of-the-IPCC_HUNGARIAN.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>ABOUT CLINTEL<\/strong><br>The Climate Intelligence foundation (Clintel) was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. Clintel\u2019s main objective is to generate knowledge and understanding of the causes and effects of climate change, as well as the effects of climate policy. Clintel published the World Climate Declaration, which has now been signed by more than 1500 scientists and experts. Its central message is \u201cthere is no climate emergency\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We are sorry to conclude that the IPCC has done a poor job of assessing the scientific literature. All countries rely on the IPCC reports to support their climate policies and most of the media blindly trust its claims. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":256950,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819127,691819481,691819482,691818381],"class_list":{"0":"post-256943","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-sensitivity","9":"tag-climate-related-deaths","10":"tag-erasing-climate-history","11":"tag-ipcc","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Screenshot-2023-05-11-191419.png?fit=795%2C920&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-14Qf","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":257406,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=257406","url_meta":{"origin":256943,"position":0},"title":"Dutch- Led Network Of International Experts Find &#8220;Serious Errors&#8220; In Latest IPCC Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The UN Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) is misleading policy makers by focusing on an implausible worst-case emissions scenarios, concludes a new analysis report published by the\u00a0Clintel Foundation","rel":"","context":"In \"Clintel report\"","block_context":{"text":"Clintel report","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=clintel-report"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00image_2022-02-28_220618.png?fit=1200%2C655&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00image_2022-02-28_220618.png?fit=1200%2C655&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00image_2022-02-28_220618.png?fit=1200%2C655&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00image_2022-02-28_220618.png?fit=1200%2C655&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00image_2022-02-28_220618.png?fit=1200%2C655&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257074,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=257074","url_meta":{"origin":256943,"position":1},"title":"New Analysis Highlights Serious Errors And Bias In Latest IPCC\u00a0Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Clintel published the World Climate Declaration, which has now been signed by more than 1500 scientists and experts. Its central message is \u201cthere is no climate emergency\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"Clintel Foundation\"","block_context":{"text":"Clintel Foundation","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=clintel-foundation"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00climate.jpg?fit=1200%2C767&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00climate.jpg?fit=1200%2C767&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00climate.jpg?fit=1200%2C767&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00climate.jpg?fit=1200%2C767&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00climate.jpg?fit=1200%2C767&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267452,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=267452","url_meta":{"origin":256943,"position":2},"title":"CLINTEL Exposes The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The International Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) sixth assessment report serves as the justification for many politicians to try and pass increasingly restrictive laws on society in the name of climate change.","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Screenshot-2023-07-14-191836.png?fit=987%2C556&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Screenshot-2023-07-14-191836.png?fit=987%2C556&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Screenshot-2023-07-14-191836.png?fit=987%2C556&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0Screenshot-2023-07-14-191836.png?fit=987%2C556&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259970,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259970","url_meta":{"origin":256943,"position":3},"title":"Clintel \u2013 Open letter to Dr Hoesung Lee Regarding IPCC AR6 Report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With the recently published Synthesis Report, the IPCC finished its sixth assessment cycle, consisting of seven reports in total.","rel":"","context":"In \"AR6 report\"","block_context":{"text":"AR6 report","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ar6-report"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clintel-1551-signatories-and-report-on-ipcc-ar-5-1024x513-1.png?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clintel-1551-signatories-and-report-on-ipcc-ar-5-1024x513-1.png?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clintel-1551-signatories-and-report-on-ipcc-ar-5-1024x513-1.png?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clintel-1551-signatories-and-report-on-ipcc-ar-5-1024x513-1.png?fit=1024%2C513&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259577,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=259577","url_meta":{"origin":256943,"position":4},"title":"A Critique of AR6","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After more than two years of hard work, Marcel Crok, I, and 11 other scientists have finally published our critique of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sixth report (AR6).","rel":"","context":"In \"AR6\"","block_context":{"text":"AR6","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ar6"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS_Figure_11.png?fit=1127%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS_Figure_11.png?fit=1127%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS_Figure_11.png?fit=1127%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS_Figure_11.png?fit=1127%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS_Figure_11.png?fit=1127%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256112,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=256112","url_meta":{"origin":256943,"position":5},"title":"The IPCC&#8217;s perversion of science","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The IPCC's \u201cCurrent Status and Trends\u201d\u00a0100% falsely portrays fossil fuels as making climate, and life, worse than ever, even though they\u2019ve made both better: \u201cClimate change has adversely affected human physical health globally\u2026 and is contributing to humanitarian crises.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/002e06bcf87ab63a049c7d8d7a9be7d185.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/002e06bcf87ab63a049c7d8d7a9be7d185.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/002e06bcf87ab63a049c7d8d7a9be7d185.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/002e06bcf87ab63a049c7d8d7a9be7d185.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/002e06bcf87ab63a049c7d8d7a9be7d185.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=256943"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":256952,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256943\/revisions\/256952"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/256950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=256943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=256943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=256943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}