{"id":255943,"date":"2023-05-04T14:19:57","date_gmt":"2023-05-04T12:19:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=255943"},"modified":"2023-05-04T14:20:07","modified_gmt":"2023-05-04T12:20:07","slug":"some-elementary-facts-about-uk-energy-use-in-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=255943","title":{"rendered":"Some Elementary Facts about UK Energy Use in 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0JIT<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This little piece is addressed to people who won\u2019t see it. I speak of those who are paid to write about energy, but don\u2019t know what it is. It was prompted by a couple of pieces in Norfolk\u2019s local newspaper, the Eastern Daily Press, or rather its web presence. The first was this<\/a> from December last year, in which the following is said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

More than 10pc of the UK\u2019s domestic energy will be supplied from a wind farm set to be built off the north Norfolk coast. Vattenfall, the firm behind the Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone, has increased its capacity to 4.2GW and will now power 700,000 more homes compared to its original design. This will see the turbines supply electricity to 4.6m houses across the country.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Wrongness abounds here. This can all be ascribed to being imprecise with language; there is no intent to deceive. Nevertheless it may give rise to a false understanding of the facts by the audience. The second <\/a>was more recent. It cuts and pastes (and links back to) the first, and says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Once completed, the 4.2GW wind zone will supply more than 10pc of the UK\u2019s domestic energy.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

As an aside, the article is actually about the cabling. No it is not manufactured in the UK. In fact:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Vattenfall, the company behind the Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone, has signed an agreement with Greek firm Hellenic Cables to provide the inter array cables for the project. Hellenic Cables will supply around 528 miles (850km) of aluminium cables \u2013 as far as from Great Yarmouth to Aberdeen \u2013 to connect the wind turbines with the offshore substation, helping to power the wind zone.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Let us begin with the obvious point. The UK\u2019s energy consumption does not solely consist of electricity. If it did, then the EDP would not be so obviously wrong \u2013 it would be on the right planet at least. Last year, according to the March 2023 update of Energy Trends, the (provisional) energy consumption of the UK was:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

170.9<\/strong> million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I prefer to use joules. Naturally this is \u201cwrong\u201d in the sense that not all the oil and gas will be used for its energy content. However, it has that potential at least. According to the internet, 1 toe = 41,868,000,000 J, so the number is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

7.16\u00d71018<\/sup><\/strong> J<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or if you prefer, 7.16<\/strong> EJ. It does not include energy sent to \u201cmarine bunkers,\u201d which is fuel for ships. It does include a small amount of electricity exports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The pie chart shows what that energy consists of. Here the electricity exports are missing, so the total is slightly higher than 7.16 EJ. The lion\u2019s share is fossil fuel; note the small share of primary electricity from our \u201czero carbon\u201d friends. Data from Energy Trends Table 1.3, except there they give the numbers in mtoe, as mentioned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Of course, the end user does not obtain all that energy goodness. Some of it is thrown away by converting the energy from one form to another (e.g. by generating electricity). The final energy delivered was 127.364 mtoe, or in joules\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5.33 <\/strong>EJ<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This does not include non-energy uses of energy. (Huh? Well, it means things like turning fossil fuel into plastic.) Of this, 0.98<\/strong> EJ was the final energy consumed as electricity. This is smaller than the quantity of electricity generated. It does not include electricity used by power generators or losses. It means that electricity is 18.5<\/strong>% of final energy consumed. [It\u2019s 273 TWh, if you prefer it that way. Energy Trends does.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How much of this is domestic electricity? The next pie shows the breakdown of the UK\u2019s final electricity consumption, provisional, for 2022. Data this time from Energy Trends Table 5.2; I have not bothered to convert into joules. The pie shows that domestic electricity is about 37<\/strong>% of all electricity. That means it\u2019s roughly 7<\/strong>% of all energy (0.37 * 0.185 as a proportion).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

So, making the assumption that our correspondent meant domestic electricity<\/em> when he spoke of domestic energy<\/em>, to reach \u201cmore than 10pc\u201d of that number, the Norfolk Offshore Wind Zone (NOWZ) needs to generate roughly 100 TWh * 0.1 ~ 10<\/strong> TWh. Once all 4.2 GW is operational, NOWZ will cover an average of 10% of domestic electricity if its capacity factor exceeds about 27%. [4.2 GW * 8766 hours in a year * 0.27 = 9.94<\/strong> TWh.] This is obviously achievable for an offshore wind \u201czone\u201d, or maybe a more appropriate term would be an offshore wind \u201cdefeatherisation.\u201d Of course, we know that the actual delivered power is likely to swing from 0.42 GW to 3.8 GW, but that\u2019s another story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If we wanted to build a wind farm to actually<\/em> produce 10% of UK domestic energy<\/strong>, not just electricity<\/strong>, how big would it have to be? Well, about 4 times larger than if you wanted to just cover 10% of domestic leccy. [The proportion of domestic energy that is electricity is usually given as 0.2, e.g. by Ofgem, but it has been creeping up over the past 25 years on my look at the numbers and is now closer to 0.25. Of course, it is eventually intended to reach 1. Given that increase in leccy \u2013 from 20% of all domestic energy to 25% \u2013 in 25 years, it might take a while for that to happen.] You would therefore need a wind farm of about 16.8<\/strong> GW.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Incidentally, the first part of NOWZ, Boreas, has been awarded a CfD<\/a> at a ludicrous price:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Government has awarded Vattenfall a CfD at \u00a337.35\/MWh (2012 prices) for the 1.4GW Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

According to power-technology.com<\/a>, it will cover 1,300 km2<\/sup> when completed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The Norfolk offshore wind zone will cover an area of 1,307km\u00b2 in the southern North Sea.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

An elementary sum would show that if NOWZ produces <1% of the UK\u2019s energy, then to produce 100% from this source, we will need 130,000 km2<\/sup> of offshore wind farms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The NOWZ belongs to Vattenfall (Swedish). As noted, the cabling is Greek. The turbines are Spanish-German. A Dutch company did the surveys. The HVDC converter stations are from a Norwegian-German consortium. Some British companies helpfully arranged pieces of paper. (I don\u2019t know where the turbines will be made.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is much more to be said on this topic, but this post is already long enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please alert me if I have missed a decimal point somewhere\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Data tables<\/strong> and the Energy Trends report available via this <\/a>link.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Featured image<\/strong>: \u201eA power engineer juggling pie charts in front of an offshore wind farm\u201c \u2013 Dall.E.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This little piece is addressed to people who won\u2019t see it. I speak of those who are paid to write about energy, but don\u2019t know what it is. It was prompted by a couple of pieces in Norfolk\u2019s local newspaper, the Eastern Daily Press, or rather its web presence. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":255948,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819311,691819310],"class_list":{"0":"post-255943","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-norfolk-offshore-wind","9":"tag-uk-energy","11":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/05e6f1c02d741c5c7e8106e70cf3a17a4.jpg?fit=4928%2C3264&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-14A7","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299614,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299614","url_meta":{"origin":255943,"position":0},"title":"Net Zero More Damaging than Climate\u00a0Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/02\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Last week, the Eastern Daily Press was kind enough to print an opinion piece of mine. This was written in response to another opinion article, one which bemoaned the lack of progress at COP28, and how damaging this was for Norfolk.","rel":"","context":"In \"China\"","block_context":{"text":"China","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=china"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/4apokalipsis-gorod-ruiny-nebo.jpg?fit=1200%2C766&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/4apokalipsis-gorod-ruiny-nebo.jpg?fit=1200%2C766&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/4apokalipsis-gorod-ruiny-nebo.jpg?fit=1200%2C766&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/4apokalipsis-gorod-ruiny-nebo.jpg?fit=1200%2C766&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/4apokalipsis-gorod-ruiny-nebo.jpg?fit=1200%2C766&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268853,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268853","url_meta":{"origin":255943,"position":1},"title":"Vattenfall Pull Boreas Offshore Wind Farm-Not Economically\u00a0Viable","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Orsted and Vattenfall contracts in Allocation Round 4, at \u00a337.35\/MWh, amount to about 4.3 GW, so will take a huge chunk out of the total of 7 GW awarded for offshore wind. The question is whether the government will now blink and offer fresh subsidies?","rel":"","context":"In \"Boreas Offshore Wind Farm\"","block_context":{"text":"Boreas Offshore Wind Farm","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=boreas-offshore-wind-farm"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0unnamed-file-345-1536x1024-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0unnamed-file-345-1536x1024-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0unnamed-file-345-1536x1024-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0unnamed-file-345-1536x1024-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0unnamed-file-345-1536x1024-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268945,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268945","url_meta":{"origin":255943,"position":2},"title":"Big Blow to UK\u2019s Green Dreams as Costs Skyrocket","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/07\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The race to net zero is leading us into a financial quicksand, sucking in vast resources for a future that will never materialize as envisaged.","rel":"","context":"In \"Green Dreams\"","block_context":{"text":"Green Dreams","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=green-dreams"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/00GettyImages-1306130708.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/00GettyImages-1306130708.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/00GettyImages-1306130708.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/00GettyImages-1306130708.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/00GettyImages-1306130708.jpg?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275260,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=275260","url_meta":{"origin":255943,"position":3},"title":"Bubble Bursts: Rising Costs Mean More Massive Offshore Wind Projects\u00a0Scrapped","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The spiralling cost of erecting ever-larger turbines at sea is matched by the spiralling costs of the raw inputs needed for the turbines themselves, which means the offshore wind power bubble has truly burst.","rel":"","context":"In \"Green Energy\"","block_context":{"text":"Green Energy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=green-energy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-914.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-914.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-914.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-914.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-914.png?fit=1200%2C797&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238624,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=238624","url_meta":{"origin":255943,"position":4},"title":"Coastal Erosion? Well, It\u2019s Climate Change, Innit?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"But punishing weather conditions linked to climate change have eroded so much of the village\u2019s soft sandy rock that her house is now the last one before the cliff edge.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-359.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-359.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-359.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-359.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255584,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=255584","url_meta":{"origin":255943,"position":5},"title":"Crumbling away \u2013 Is dredging the villain in the drama of Britain\u2019s eroding coasts?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"And about half the East Anglian sand is exported, mostly to the Netherlands. Schiphol airport near Amsterdam was constructed from Norfolk aggregate.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00sheringham-1398208.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00sheringham-1398208.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00sheringham-1398208.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00sheringham-1398208.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/00sheringham-1398208.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=255943"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":255949,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255943\/revisions\/255949"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/255948"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=255943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=255943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=255943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}