{"id":255673,"date":"2023-05-02T20:15:16","date_gmt":"2023-05-02T18:15:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=255673"},"modified":"2023-05-02T20:15:26","modified_gmt":"2023-05-02T18:15:26","slug":"though-beleaguered-science-education-is-alive-in-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=255673","title":{"rendered":"Though Beleaguered, Science Education is Alive in America"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

National Science Teachers Association Rejects the Scientific Method<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

by Dr. Sharon Camp<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Never have I been so inspired upon being removed from a venue. Actually, as a retired teacher of AP (advanced placement) environmental sciences and chemistry, I haven\u2019t been escorted from very many places. Perhaps none. I should explain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am a member of the CO2 Coalition<\/a>, in Arlington, Virginia, where I wear my scientist hat \u2013 a B.S. in geology and Ph.D. in analytical chemistry \u2013 and serve on the organization\u2019s education committee. In supporting our mission of educating the public and policymakers on the benefits of carbon dioxide and the role of the gas in Earth\u2019s ecosystems, I tap into my teaching and science backgrounds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As one of four people chosen to represent the CO2 Coalition at the March meeting of the National Science Teaching Association (NSTA) in Atlanta, I looked forward to returning to a conference I found so engaging as a teacher. Thousands of educators congregate at the annual meeting to hear lectures and explore the displays of hundreds of vendors for new tools to use for labs and lessons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I did not quite know what to expect from teachers visiting the CO2 Coalition\u2019s conference display.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the one hand, we offered educational materials, including beautifully designed comic books and entertaining videos, and lesson plans. All would be useful in teaching the science behind carbon dioxide as an atmospheric gas and plant fertilizer. However, we also had a newly published paper<\/a> that is critical of the NSTA\u2019s position on teaching climate change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 40,000-member association\u2019s position paper, \u201cThe Teaching of Climate Science<\/a>,\u201d instructs teachers to conform to the so-called consensus that human-induced emissions of carbon dioxide will cause dangerous heating of the atmosphere and to dismiss contradictory evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The association accepts the opinions of various organizations backing the popular global-warming theory while rejecting the differing views of thousands of scientists. Such dissenters include researchers of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), who disagree with the IPCC\u2019s politicized, official reports to the public, and the CO2 Coalition\u2019s more than 100 members. The plain truth is that the NSTA position ignores the tenets of the 400-year-old scientific method.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a teacher of science like me, the scientific method is more than some formalized procedure. It requires that a student be able to write a hypothesis, design experiments to test the proposition, accurately collect high-quality data, and apply critical thinking to findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My labs were data-driven, meaning students were to have no preconceived notions about the results of experiments. Rather, they were to rely on the analysis of data gathered with care and integrity. Students applied the scientific method and critical thinking to actual experiments instead of learning only about abstract concepts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How can somebody with my regard for science sit quietly by when a national organization claiming to represent 40,000 members tosses aside an empirical approach to discovery that has underpinned western civilization for centuries? How to remain silent when those claiming educational dominion over children require their adherence to an unscientific methodology and censorship of dissenting voices? Well, I can\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, there I stood in an Atlanta conference center with colleagues (a communications specialist, a geologist and IPCC reviewer, and a Ph.D. in chemistry), eager to share our knowledge and educational aids \u2013 and wondering how our critique of NSTA\u2019s views on climate change would be received.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At first, we were overwhelmed by an enthusiastically appreciative response from educators, including teachers from public and private institutions and homeschoolers. We ran out of lesson plans in two hours. There clearly was a need for non-politicized material on the science behind photosynthesis, cellular respiration, carbon dioxide, and other atmospheric gases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More than half the teachers we encountered expressed doubts about the rhetoric of climate alarmists. Surprisingly to us, even more were shocked to learn of NSTA\u2019s position on teaching climate change and its unquestioning rejection of evidence contradicting establishment orthodoxy. Most of the teachers \u2013 unlike, apparently, NSTA leadership \u2013 understood science to be a process of continual inquiry and debate guided by testable data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By halfway through the conference\u2019s second day, nearly all our material had been distributed. It was then that organizers of the NSTA gathering insisted that we stop sharing our critique of the association\u2019s anti-science position. For refusing to yield to this censorship, we were escorted from the building.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We were, nonetheless, encouraged by finding so many educators hungry for honest discovery and, in some cases, grateful for scientific information utterly new to them. We concluded that NSTA\u2019s narrow approach to learning is being driven by a politically-correct bureaucracy disconnected from a significant number of the association\u2019s members.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is hope for science education in America. Our work continues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This commentary was first published at [Your] News<\/a>, April 25, 2023, and can be accessed here<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sharon Camp<\/a> has a bachelor\u2019s degree in geology from the University of Georgia and a Ph.D. in analytical chemistry from Georgia Tech. She has worked in industry, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and as an advanced placement environmental science teacher. She is the Senior Education Advisor for the CO2 Coalition<\/a>, in Arlington, Virginia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Science Teachers Association Rejects the Scientific Method<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":255676,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691819108,691818721,691818076,691818380],"class_list":{"0":"post-255673","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-dioxide","9":"tag-climate-alarmists","10":"tag-co2","11":"tag-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Science-Education.png?fit=850%2C446&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-14vL","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":249451,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=249451","url_meta":{"origin":255673,"position":0},"title":"Challenging the NSTA\u2019s Position Statement on Climate Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The CO2 Coalition has reviewed the National Science Teaching Association\u2019s Position Statement on Climate Change and has found that it has serious problems, which we address in this assessment.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1041.png?fit=1200%2C1001&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1041.png?fit=1200%2C1001&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1041.png?fit=1200%2C1001&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1041.png?fit=1200%2C1001&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1041.png?fit=1200%2C1001&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249981,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=249981","url_meta":{"origin":255673,"position":1},"title":"UGLY: Climate Skeptic Group Gets EVICTED from National Science Teaching Association Convention","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From the\u00a0You can\u2019t handle the truth! department comes this sad but predictable tale of closed minded pettiness.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1192.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1192.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1192.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1192.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1192.png?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250210,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=250210","url_meta":{"origin":255673,"position":2},"title":"Shining Light on Science Education\u2019s Dark Age","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"29\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The science teachers\u2019 bureaucracy is driving climate education into an unquestioning adherence to unscientific methodology.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1250.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1250.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1250.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1250.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1250.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285850,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285850","url_meta":{"origin":255673,"position":3},"title":"Scientific Method Restored to Science Education in North Carolina","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Scientific Method requires that questions be asked, observations made, and hypotheses formulated, tested, and proven or rejected. Conclusions are always subject to challenges with new evidence and insights. From Watts Up With That? by Gregory Wrightstone As a physicist, John Droz holds in high regard the Scientific Method, a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate science\"","block_context":{"text":"climate science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-858.png?fit=1200%2C791&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-858.png?fit=1200%2C791&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-858.png?fit=1200%2C791&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-858.png?fit=1200%2C791&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-858.png?fit=1200%2C791&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":429638,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=429638","url_meta":{"origin":255673,"position":4},"title":"Muddling the Judiciary\u2019s Understanding of Science","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"While an educational manual for federal judges was improved when a biased representation of climate change was removed, a remaining chapter on the fundamentals of science would poison the judiciary with quackery.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Alarmists\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Alarmists","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmists"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/02a8bce31-97cb-452a-b3d2-3f3a84bd77ce_1280x853.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/02a8bce31-97cb-452a-b3d2-3f3a84bd77ce_1280x853.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/02a8bce31-97cb-452a-b3d2-3f3a84bd77ce_1280x853.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/02a8bce31-97cb-452a-b3d2-3f3a84bd77ce_1280x853.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/02a8bce31-97cb-452a-b3d2-3f3a84bd77ce_1280x853.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246517,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=246517","url_meta":{"origin":255673,"position":5},"title":"Challenging Net Zero with Science: Lindzen-Happer-CO2 Coalition Paper Released","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Net Zero Plans Are Dangerous and Unsupported by Science and the Scienti\ufb01c Method","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-67.png?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-67.png?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-67.png?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-67.png?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-67.png?fit=1200%2C626&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=255673"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":255678,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255673\/revisions\/255678"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/255676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=255673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=255673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=255673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}