{"id":220870,"date":"2022-09-27T12:22:31","date_gmt":"2022-09-27T10:22:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=220870"},"modified":"2022-09-27T12:22:54","modified_gmt":"2022-09-27T10:22:54","slug":"un-climate-threat-top-farming-and-food-firms-could-lose-up-to-a-quarter-of-their-value-by-2030-if-they-do-not-adapt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=220870","title":{"rendered":"UN Climate Threat: \u201cTop farming and food firms could lose up to a quarter of their value by 2030 if they do not adapt\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Essay by Eric Worrall<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the United Nations \u201cRace to Zero\u201d campaign, net zero policies will make food production companies uninvestable, unless they follow net zero food rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Farm and food investors face $150 billion loss on climate change, report says<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Ross Kerber<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sept 20 (Reuters) \u2013 Top farming and food firms could lose up to a quarter of their value by 2030 if they do not adapt to new government policies and consumer behavior tied to climate change, United Nations-affiliated campaigners said in a new report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research to be presented on Tuesday looked at how 40 big companies including agricultural producers and food retailers could fare under scenarios called key to reducing emissions, such as if governments impose carbon emssions prices or if consumers reduce their consumption of meat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study, seen by Reuters News, found the companies\u2019 value would decline by an average of around 7% by 2030, equivalent to some $150 billion in investor losses, if they did not adopt new practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe reality is stark: Nature risk is fast becoming an integral factor to investment risk,\u201d said Peter Harrison, chief executive of Schroders Plc, in a statement sent by a Race to Zero representative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026Read more: https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/business\/environment\/farm-food-investors-face-150-bln-loss-climate-change-report-2022-09-20\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

If anyone can find a link to the Race to Zero report please post in comments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cRace to Zero\u201d<\/a>, the people who published this analysis, are a UN group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why do the social engineers always attack food abundance? We\u2019ve already had a warning of what the Net Zero \/ low nitrate food push could do to us, the organic food shortage catastrophe in Sri Lanka.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The top down social engineers \u2013 Stalin<\/a>, Mao<\/a>, Pol Pot<\/a>, Hugo Ch\u00e1vez<\/a>, Dutch Government<\/a> (nitrate fertiliser jihad), Biden (baby food shortage \/ green leap forward), and now the UN\u2019s Net Zero push. With their coercion of food companies and farmers, the social engineers always seem to find a way to make people go hungry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Update (EW): h\/t\u00a0Redge<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 To view the UN report click\u00a0Assessing the Financial Impact of the Land Use Transition on the Food and Agriculture Sector<\/a>. Thanks Redge.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

via Watts Up With That?<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

September 27, 2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
UN Climate Threat: “Top farming and food firms could lose up to a quarter of their value by 2030 if they do not adapt”<\/a><\/blockquote>