{"id":178359,"date":"2021-12-16T17:57:38","date_gmt":"2021-12-16T16:57:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=178359"},"modified":"2021-12-16T17:57:40","modified_gmt":"2021-12-16T16:57:40","slug":"europe-forecast-a-bitterly-cold-and-snowy-christmas-virus-leak-washington-post-google-attacks-electroverse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=178359","title":{"rendered":"Europe Forecast a Bitterly Cold and Snowy Christmas, Virus Leak, + Washington Post (& Google) Attacks Electroverse\u2026?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today\u2019s article will be a short one. I\u2019m having to \u2018fight fires\u2019 after waking to this email purportedly from the WP:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI\u2019m a reporter with the Washington Post, and I\u2019m working on a piece about new research from the Center for Countering Digital Hate. They found 50 ads that appeared to be violating Google\u2019s misinformation policy, which says the company won\u2019t run ads on content that contradicts the scientific consensus on climate change\u2019s existence. It includes several examples from electroverse, including one post that claimed there are no credible scientists warning of a \u2018climate emergency\u2019 \u2014 not a single one. The company responded by saying it would cease advertising with electroverse. Do you have a comment?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m not entirely sure what they\u2019re even saying: The Center for Countering Digital Hate found examples of electroverse articles within ads<\/em> \u2026? I doubt it. But the email does seem genuine, so I\u2019d best give it some time. So far I have this: \u201cIt should not be considered a \u2018violation\u2019 to disagree with a scientific theory, not least one with as many holes as AGW.\u201d Bazinga!<\/em> \"\ud83e\udd37\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I can\u2019t spend too much time on my comment, though, as I have an intense 24+hour Monopoly game to finish with my three young kids. Serving as a little background, myself and my wife took them out of mainstream education a few years back, something I advise all parents do. Homeschooling is hard at times, for a multitude of different reasons, but it is entirely necessary\u2013we aren\u2019t raising sheep.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Europe Forecast A Bitterly Cold and Snowy Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Latest weather models have\u00a0doubled<\/b><\/mark><\/em> down\u00a0on Europe, including the UK, facing a cold and snowy Christmas this year.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The anomalously cold conditions which have prevailed since mid-November will linger into the late-December; in fact, they look set to intensify as the month progresses:
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
GFS 2m Temperature Anomaly (C) Dec 20 \u2013 Dec 29 [tropicaltidbits.com<\/a>].<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n


As suggested, this Arctic outbreak will also deliver healthy dumpings of\u00a0snow\u00a0<\/mark><\/em><\/strong>to much of the continent:
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
GFS Total Snowfall (cm) Dec 20 \u2013 Jan 1 [tropicaltidbits.com<\/a>].<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n


As I\u2019ve reported to death in recent weeks, Europe is currently facing a serious energy shortage, which is due to 1)<\/strong> the depletion of stocks during last year\u2019s historically cold and long winter, and 2)<\/strong> a reckless reliance on failing renewables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to a recent note from EnergyScan: Europe\u2019s power spot prices are soaring, \u201clifted by forecasts of higher demand [as well as] weak wind and solar generation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The very last thing the continent needs is an increase in heating demand due to cold weather, but that\u2019s exactly what it\u2019s getting as the sun slips into its next Grand Solar Minimum<\/a> cycle. Saying that though, this energy issue, like so many of today\u2019s problems (see below), is largely self-inflicted \u2014 man appears hellbent on shooting himself in the foot, over and over again. Or is that the part of the plan? Is this a key component of the Great Reset?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just yesterday (Dec 15), British MPs were told by Dr Alina Chan, a specialist in gene therapy and cell engineering at MIT and Harvard, that COVID-19 \u201cmost likely\u201d came from the Wuhan lab, and that the virus may have been \u201cgenetically engineered\u201d.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dr Chan told the Science and Technology Select Committee: \u201cI think the lab origin is more likely than not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cRight now it\u2019s not safe for people who know about the origin of the pandemic to come forward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBut we live in an era where there is so much information being stored that it will eventually come out.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dr Chan also warned that the virus was likely engineered by scientists: \u201cWe have heard from many top virologists that a genetically engineered origin is reasonable and that includes virologists who made modifications to the first Sars virus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe know this virus has a unique feature, called the furin cleavage site, and without this feature, there is no way this would be causing this pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cA proposal was leaked showing that EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology were developing a pipeline for inserting novel furin cleavage sites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, you find these scientists who said in early 2018 \u2018I\u2019m going to put horns on horses\u2019 and at the end of 2019 a unicorn turns up in Wuhan city.\u201d
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The truth always prevails\u2026 eventually \u2014 next up, vaccine side effects, including deaths.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Follow the\u00a0silence<\/em>:

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Corruption Of The Peer-Review And Publishing Process: “Follow The Silence”<\/a><\/blockquote>